Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A simple climatology of westerly jet streams in global reanalysis datasets part 1: mid-latitude upper tropospheric jets

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple closed contour object identification scheme has been applied to the zonal mean monthly mean zonal wind fields from nine global reanalysis data sets for 31 years of the satellite era (1979–2009) to identify objects corresponding to westerly jet streams. The results cluster naturally into six individual jet streams but only the mid-latitude upper-tropospheric jets are considered here. The time series of the jet properties from all reanalyses are decomposed into seasonal means and anomalies, and correlations between variables are evaluated, with the aim of identifying robust features which can form the basis of evaluation metrics for climate model simulations of the twentieth century. There is substantial agreement between all the reanalyses for all jet properties although there are some systematic differences with particular data sets. Some of the results from the object identification applied to the reanalyses are used in a simple example of a model evaluation score for the zonal mean jet seasonal cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Downloaded from http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/climateindices/list/#QBO.

  2. ERA-40 was not included in the mean reanalysis because it does not span the full time period.

References

  • Archer CL, Caldeira K (2008) Historical trends in the jet streams. Geophys Res Lett 35:1–6. doi:10.1029/2008GL033614

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin M, Gray L, Dunkerton T (2001) The quasi-biennial oscillation. Rev Geophys 39:179–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bals-Elsholz T, Atallah E, Bosart LF et al (2001) The wintertime Southern Hemisphere split jet: structure, variability, and evolution. J Clim 14:4191–4215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brönnimann S (2007) Impact of El Nino–Southern Oscillation on European climate. Rev Geophys 45:1–28. doi:10.1029/2006RG000199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brönnimann S, Stickler A, Griesser T et al (2009) Variability of large-scale atmospheric circulation indices for the northern hemisphere during the past 100 years. Meteorol Z 18:379–396. doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2009/0389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compo GP, Whitaker JS, Sardeshmukh PD et al (2011) The twentieth century reanalysis project. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137:1–28. doi:10.1002/qj.776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis SM, Rosenlof KH (2012) A multidiagnostic intercomparison of tropical-width time series using reanalyses and satellite observations. J Clim 25:1061–1078. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00127.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons J et al (2011) The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137:553–597. doi:10.1002/qj.828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzerdzeevskii BL (1945) Tsirkuliatsionnye skhemy v troposfere. Tsentral’noi Arktiki. Izd. Akad. Nauk [English transl. Sci. Rep. No. 3, Contract AF 19 (122)-3228. UCLA]

  • Eichler T, Higgins W (2006) Climatology and ENSO-related variability of North American extratropical cyclone activity. J Clim 19:2076–2093. doi:10.1175/JCLI3725.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frauenfeld OW, Davis RE (2003) Northern Hemisphere circumpolar vortex trends and climate change implications. J Geophys Res 108:4423. doi:10.1029/2002JD002958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego D, Ribera P, Garcia-Herrera R et al (2005) A new look for the Southern Hemisphere jet stream. Clim Dyn 24:607–621. doi:10.1007/s00382-005-0006-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grotjahn R (2008) Different data, different general circulations? A comparison of selected fields in NCEP/DOE AMIP-II and ECMWF ERA-40 reanalyses. Dyn Atmos Ocean 44:108–142. doi:10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2007.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held IM, Suarez MJ (1994) A proposal for the intercomparison of the dynamical cores of atmospheric general circulation models. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 75:1825–1830. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1994)075<1825:APFTIO>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho M, Kiem AS, Verdon-Kidd DC (2012) The Southern Annular Mode: a comparison of indices. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:967–982. doi:10.5194/hess-16-967-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones E, Oliphant E, Peterson P et al (2001) SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python. http://www.scipy.org/. Accessed 05 Nov 2014

  • Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R et al (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamitsu M, Ebisuzaki W, Woollen J et al (2002) NCEP–DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:1631–1643. doi:10.1175/BAMS-83-11-1631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidston J, Vallis GK (2010) Relationship between eddy-driven jet latitude and width. Geophys Res Lett 37:L21809. doi:10.1029/2010GL044849

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidston J, Vallis GK (2012) The relationship between the speed and the latitude of an eddy-driven jet in a stirred barotropic model. J Atmos Sci 69:3251–3263. doi:10.1175/JAS-D-11-0300.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kistler R, Collins W, Saha S et al (2001) The NCEP-NCAR 50-year reanalysis: monthly means CD-ROM and documentation. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82:247–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi S, Ota Y, Harada Y et al (2015) The JRA-55 reanalysis: general specifications and basic characteristics. J Meteorol Soc Jpn. doi:10.2151/jmsj.2015-001

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch P, Wernli H, Davies HC (2006) An event-based jet-stream climatology and typology. Int J Climatol 26:283–301. doi:10.1002/joc.1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis J (2003) Ooishi’s observation: viewed in the context of jet stream discovery. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. doi:10.1175/BAMS-84-issue

    Google Scholar 

  • Limbach S, Schömer E, Wernli H (2012) Detection, tracking and event localization of jet stream features in 4-D atmospheric data. Geosci Model Dev 5:457–470. doi:10.5194/gmd-5-457-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas C, Nguyen H, Timbal B (2012) An observational analysis of Southern Hemisphere tropical expansion. J Geophys Res Atmos 117:D17112. doi:10.1029/2011JD017033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manney GL, Hegglin MI, Daffer WH et al (2011) Jet characterization in the upper troposphere/lower stratosphere (UTLS): applications to climatology and transport studies. Atmos Chem Phys 11:1835–1889. doi:10.5194/acpd-11-1835-2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May W, Bengtsson L (1998) The signature of ENSO in the Northern Hemisphere midlatitude seasonal mean flow and high-frequency intraseasonal variability. Meteorol Atmos Phys 69:81–100. doi:10.1007/BF01025185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onogi K, Tsutsui J, Koide H et al (2007) The JRA-25 reanalysis. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 85:369–432. doi:10.2151/jmsj.85.369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paek H, Huang H-P (2012) A comparison of decadal-to-interdecadal variability and trend in reanalysis datasets using atmospheric angular momentum. J Clim 25(13):4750–4758. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00358.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pena-Ortiz C, Gallego D, Ribera P et al (2013) Observed trends in the global jet stream characteristics during the second half of the 20th century. J Geophys Res Atmos 118:2702–2713. doi:10.1002/jgrd.50305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed RJ, Kunkel BA (1960) The arctic circulation in summer. J Meteorol 17:489–506. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1960)017<0489:TACIS>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rienecker MM, Suarez MJ, Gelaro R et al (2011) MERRA: NASA’s modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications. J Clim 24:3624–3648. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00015.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha S, Moorthi S, Pan H-L et al (2010) The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91:1015–1057. doi:10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santer BD, Wigley TML, Boyle JS et al (2000) Statistical significance of trends and trend differences in layer-average atmospheric temperature time series. J Geophys Res 105:7337. doi:10.1029/1999JD901105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro MA, Keyser D (1990) Fronts, jet streams, and the tropopause. In: Newton CW, Halopainen EO (eds) Extratropical cyclones: the Erik Palmen Memorial volume. American Meteorological Society, Bostan, MA, pp 167–189

  • Strong C, Davis RE (2005) The surface of maximum wind as an alternative to the isobaric surface for wind climatology. Geophys Res Lett 32:L04813. doi:10.1029/2004GL022039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong C, Davis RE (2006) Variability in the altitude of fast upper tropospheric winds over the Northern Hemisphere during winter. J Geophys Res 111:D10106. doi:10.1029/2005JD006497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong C, Davis R (2007) Winter jet stream trends over the Northern Hemisphere. Q J R Meteorol Soc 2115:2109–2115. doi:10.1002/qj

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong C, Davis RE (2008) Variability in the position and strength of winter jet stream cores related to Northern Hemisphere teleconnections. J Clim 21:584–592. doi:10.1175/2007JCLI1723.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson D, Wallace J (2000) Annular modes in the extratropical circulation. Part I: month-to-month variability. J Clim 13(5):1000–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uppala SM, KÅllberg PW, Simmons J et al (2005) The ERA-40 re-analysis. Q J R Meteorol Soc 131:2961–3012. doi:10.1256/qj.04.176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbesselt J, Hyndman R, Newnham G, Culvenor D (2010) Detecting trend and seasonal changes in satellite image time series. Remote Sens Environ 114:106–115. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks DS (2011) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. International geophysics series, vol 100, 3rd edn. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • WMO (1995) Manual on Codes. WMO Publ. 306, Vol. 1.1 World Meteorological Organization, Avenue Giuseppe- Motta 41, CP2300, 1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland

  • Woollings T, Hannachi A, Hoskins B (2010) Variability of the North Atlantic eddy-driven jet stream. Q J R Meteorol Soc 136(649):856–868. doi:10.1002/qj.625

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Twentieth century Reanalysis V2 data provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from their Web site at http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/. Support for the Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project dataset is provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science Innovative and Novel Computational Impact on Theory and Experiment (DOE INCITE) program, and Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER), and by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Climate Program Office.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrie Rikus.

Appendix: The definition of seasonal metric scores

Appendix: The definition of seasonal metric scores

The main quantities needed to derive the metric scores for the seasonal cycle are the mean reanalysis mean (OMean) and standard deviation (OSTD) as defined in Sect. 5 and the 31 year mean seasonal cycle (MMean) from the model to be evaluated.

The mean error score is the simple difference in annual means scaled by the annual mean of OSTD to make it dimensionless, viz,

$$MScore = (\overline{MMean} - \overline{OMean} )/\overline{OSTD}$$

where the overbar denotes the mean over the year. Monthly anomaly series are defined by,

$$MAnom_{m} = MMean_{m} - \overline{MMean}$$

where m is the month index. The annual ranges are defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum monthly values,

$$MRange = \hbox{max} \left( {MAnom} \right) - { \hbox{min} }(MAnom)$$

The observation anomaly and range are defined similarly. The range score is defined by,

$$RScore = (MRange - ORange)/\overline{OSTD}.$$

The shape error is defined as a scaled RMS error using the monthly anomaly series normalized by the range,

$$SScore = \sqrt {\mathop \sum \limits_{m} \left\{ {\left( {MNorm_{m} - ONorm_{m} } \right)/\left( {\frac{{OSTD_{m} }}{ORange}} \right)} \right\}^{2} }$$

where the normalized series are defined by,

$$MNorm_{m} = {\raise0.7ex\hbox{${MAnom_{m} }$} \!\mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{MAnom_{m} } {MRange}}}\right.\kern-0pt} \!\lower0.7ex\hbox{${MRange}$}}.$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rikus, L. A simple climatology of westerly jet streams in global reanalysis datasets part 1: mid-latitude upper tropospheric jets. Clim Dyn 50, 2285–2310 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2560-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2560-y

Keywords

Navigation