Abstract
The need for novel, effective adjuvants that are capable of eliciting stronger cellular and humoral adaptive immune responses to antigenic targets is well understood in the vaccine development field. Unfortunately, many adjuvants investigated thus far are either too toxic for human application or too weak to induce a substantial response against difficult antigens, such as tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). In spite of this trend, clinical investigations of recombinant Eimeria antigen (rEA) have revealed this protein to be a non-toxic immunogenic agent with the ability to trigger a Th1-predominant response in both murine and human subjects. Our past studies have shown that the injection of a rEA-encoding adenovirus (rAd5-rEA) alongside an HIV antigen-encoding adenovirus greatly improves the adaptive immune response against this pathogen-derived transgene. In this report, we investigated whether rAd5-rEA could promote and/or alter cytotoxic memory responses toward carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), a colorectal cancer-related TAA. We found that the addition of rAd5-rEA to an Ad-based CEA vaccine induced a dose-dependent increase in several anti-CEA T and B cell responses. Moreover, inclusion of rAd5-rEA increased the number of CEA-derived antigenic epitopes that elicited significant cell-mediated and IgG-mediated recognition. These enhanced anti-CEA immune responses also translated into superior CEA-targeted cell killing, as evaluated by an in vivo cytotoxic T lymphocyte assay. Overall, these results suggest that co-administration of rAd5-rEA with a tumor antigen vaccine can substantially boost and broaden the TAA-specific adaptive memory response, thereby validating the potential of rAd5-rEA to be a beneficial adjuvant during therapeutic cancer vaccination.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Immune responses against cancerous cells are often absent as a result of systemic T cell-mediated tolerance against them and their respective tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). To mount a substantial immune response against malignancies, successful immunotherapy trials have shown that a therapeutic vaccine must be able to initiate and propagate a strong, TAA-specific cytotoxic immune response [1]. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) has been identified as a particularly promising TAA target due to its ubiquitous overexpression in colorectal and other carcinomas, as well as its relatively high level of immunogenicity [2]. Various methods have been employed to use CEA as a vaccine transgene, with several resulting in the induction of CEA-targeted cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses and anti-CEA antibody production [3–6]. Recently, a phase I/II clinical trial in which colorectal cancer patients, who had failed an average of three prior chemotherapeutic regimens, were administered adenovirus vectors expressing an enhanced, modified version of CEA (rAd5-CEA) was conducted [7, 8]. This CEA-expressing adenovirus vector multiplied anti-CEA cell-mediated immunity (CMI) responses several fold over patient pre-vaccination baseline. In addition, patient survival rates at 1 year were found to be greater than those previously reported in demographically similar colorectal cancer patient populations [9] and were most improved in the treatment group given the highest dose of rAd5-CEA.
As this and many other cancer immunotherapy trials have revealed, there is a substantial positive correlation between the amount of TAA-directed CMI produced and rates of patient survival. It has also been recognized that even immunotherapy-naïve patient tumor microenvironments often contain TAA-presenting cells, yet they do not readily activate a CTL response against the antigen when present [10, 11]. Therefore, in addition to a TAA vaccination, successful treatment may also require an adjuvant to promote long-term immunity and memory toward the cancer cells.
Several adjuvants have been shown to improve both the degree and breadth of antigen-specific cellular immune responses, particularly those that trigger Toll-like receptor (TLR) and other pattern recognition receptor (PRR)-mediated innate immune responses [12–16]. Recombinant Eimeria antigen (rEA) is a notable activator of TLR and non-TLR innate immune signaling pathways. rEA was initially identified within the Eimeria tenella protozoan as an inducer of high IL-12 levels in the bovine intestine, an effect that promoted an overall anti-tumorigenic environment [17]. Injection of the rEA protein has since been shown to prolong survival of tumor-carrying mice and induce a safe, cytokine-dependent decrease in the CA-125 tumor marker within advanced malignancy patients [17, 18]. In previous studies, we have created an rEA-expressing recombinant adenovirus vector (rAd5-rEA) and shown that in vivo delivery of this agent can promote a Th1-skewed, pro-inflammatory response greater than rEA protein or a non-specific recombinant adenovirus, as measured by heightened cytokine responses (e.g., IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-12(p70)), activation of innate immune cells (e.g., NK, NKT, DC), and greater transgene memory responses against a co-injected HIV-derived (HIV-gag) antigen [19]. Moreover, we have found that rEA can directly promote human NK effector cell activation and stimulate human peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) cytolytic tumor cell killing [20]. Based on these findings, we wished to investigate whether co-administration of rAd5-CEA and rAd5-rEA could further improve anti-CEA immunity. Additionally, we explored the spectrum, quantity, and relationship of T and B cell-facilitated adaptive immune responses that rAd5-rEA introduces to a vaccine regimen targeting a human-relevant TAA.
Methods
Recombinant adenovirus vector construction
Recombinant Ad5 vectors rAd5-CEA [7], rAd5-rEA [19], and rAd5-GFP [21] were built and propagated as previously described. rAd5-GFP was used as a control vector as it was previously confirmed to have no significant impact on measurable adaptive immune responses to co-administered antigens [22]. The cDNA sequence of human CAP1(6D)-modified CEA was produced and generously supplied from Duke University [23]. Vectors underwent recombination and viral propagation as previously described [24]. All vectors underwent direct sequencing to verify correct transgene insertion and were found to be replication-incompetent via E1 gene region deletion by PCR, as previously described [25]. Viral particle (vp) titers were determined by spectrophotometry and SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis following silver stain or Western blotting.
Animal care and procedures
All animal procedures were conducted under the approval of Michigan State University’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Eight-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and injected intramuscularly (IM) into the tibialis anterior of the right hindlimb with 20 μL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) solution containing a total of 1 × 108–1 × 1010 vp, including rAd5-CEA and an equivalent vp dose of either rAd5-GFP or rAd5-rEA. Splenocytes and blood plasma were obtained and processed as previously described [26].
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISpot) assay analysis
ELISpot assay analyses were performed using Ready-Set-GO! ELISpot mouse IFN-γ and IL-2 kits (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), as previously described [27]. In brief, splenocytes (5 × 106 cells/well) from individual mice were incubated on capture antibody pre-treated plates with individual CEA peptides or a CEA peptide pool (0.4 μg/well). Individual CEA peptides were 15 aa in size and covered the CEA498–676 sequence with a CAP1(6D) modification in 10 aa overlaps using a PepTrack peptide library (JPT Peptide Technologies, Berlin, Germany). The CEA peptide pool of CAP1(6D)-modified CEA sequence peptides was a generous gift from Dr. Michael Morse at Duke Medical Center [8]. Staining of plates was performed as described in manufacturer’s protocol. Plate well photography and spot-forming cell (SFC) quantification were performed by an automated ELISpot reader (Cellular Technology, Cleveland, OH).
Cell staining and flow cytometry
Fluorescent intracellular staining was performed as previously described [28]. In brief, 2 × 106 splenocytes were stained with APC-Cy7-CD3, Alexa Fluor700-CD8a, and CD16/32 Fc-block antibodies, fixed using 2 % formaldehyde (Polysciences, Warrington, PA), permeabilized using 0.2 % saponin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), stained for intracellular cytokines using APC-granzyme B, FITC-IFN-γ, PE-perforin, PE-Cy7-TNF-α (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA), and PerCpCy5.5-IL-2 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), and stained for dead cell exclusion using violet fluorescent reactive dye (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cells were analyzed, and 2 × 105 events per sample were captured with an LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) using FlowJo software (Tree Star, San Carlos, CA, USA).
In vivo cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) assay
In vivo CTL analysis was performed similar to previously described studies [27]. Briefly, mice were vaccinated with 5 × 109 vp rAd5-CEA and 5 × 109 vp of either rAd5-GFP or rAd5-rEA. At 21 days post-injection (dpi), syngeneic splenocytes were pulsed with a CEA-specific peptide pool or the irrelevant HIV-gag peptide, AMQ (AMQMLKETI), for 1 h at 37 °C. Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) was used to stain CEA-pulsed splenocytes at a 10 μM concentration (CFSEHigh) and AMQ-pulsed splenocytes at a 1 μM concentration (CFSELow). Immunized and naïve mice were injected in the left retro-orbital sinus with equal amounts of CEA- and AMQ-pulsed splenocytes at a total volume of 8 × 106 cells. Twenty-four hours following splenocyte infusion, mice were killed for splenocyte collection; these cells were washed and analyzed by FACS with a LSRII flow cytometer. FlowJo software was utilized to quantify amounts of CFSE-stained splenocytes. The percentage of specific CEA-pulsed splenocyte killing was determined using the following equation: % specific killing = 1 − ((% CFSEHigh/% CFSELow)immunized/(% CFSEHigh/% CFSELow)naive).
Anti-CEA and anti-Ad ELISA analysis
ELISAs were performed as previously described [29]. Briefly, 5 × 108 vp of a null Ad5 vector, 0.2 μg CEA peptide pool, or 0.2 μg individual CEA peptide epitopes were plated per well in a high-binding 96-well flat-bottom plate. Following overnight 4 °C incubation, plates were rinsed with washing buffer (PBS containing 0.05 % Tween) and incubated with blocking buffer (PBS containing 3 % bovine serum albumin) for an hour at room temperature. Plasma was plated following 1:1,600 dilution (or pooled and diluted 1:10 for the measurement of individual CEA epitope IgG binding) in blocking buffer and incubated for an hour at room temperature. Wells were subsequently rinsed with washing buffer and coated with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse antibody (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) diluted 1:4,000 in washing buffer. Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to each well to initiate the spectrophotometric reaction, which was stopped with 1 N phosphoric acid. Plates were analyzed using an automatic microplate reader at 450 nm absorbance.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis comparing in vivo CTL CEA-specific killing between Ad treatment groups was performed using a Student’s t test. The association between percent CEA-specific in vivo CTL killing and anti-CEA IgG titers within individual animals was tested with the Pearson correlation coefficient. All other experiment data where statistical significance was determined were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA with a Newman-Keuls post hoc correction. All graphs in this paper are presented as mean ± standard error. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).
Results
Increased rAd5-CEA transgene-specific CMI responses induced in the presence of rAd5-rEA
We and others have verified that rAd5-CEA vaccination of murine and human subjects induces significant CEA-specific CMI [7, 8, 27]. To examine whether the addition of rAd5-rEA to a TAA-expressing vaccine would further promote anti-TAA CMI responses, we treated mice with rAd5-CEA and an equivalent dose of either rAd5-rEA or a GFP-expressing control adenovirus vector (rAd5-GFP). Mice were injected with a total viral dose of either 1 × 108, 1 × 109, or 1 × 1010 vp per mouse. Splenocytes were harvested at 14 dpi, processed, and analyzed for anti-CEA-specific CMI by IFN-γ and IL-2 ELISpot assays. Our data revealed the amount of CEA-specific, IFN-γ-secreting splenocytes to be greater in mice injected with the rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA combination rather than those given rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP (Fig. 1a). Specifically, both the 1 × 109 and 1 × 1010 vp rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA groups yielded statistically more IFN-γ-secreting splenocytes than the 1 × 108 and 1 × 109 vp rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP-treated groups (p < 0.01). IL-2 ELISpot analysis also revealed a significantly greater CEA-specific CMI response when comparing the 1 × 109 vp dose of rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA with the 1 × 108 (p < 0.01) and 1 × 109 vp (p < 0.05) rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP-treated animals, as well as the 1 × 108 vp dose of rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA-treated animals (p < 0.05), showing a positive relationship between dose and rAd5-rEA-promoted CEA-specific CMI (Fig. 1b). Interestingly, the 1 × 1010 vp dose showed no significant difference in the amount of cells secreting IL-2 in response to CEA stimulation. These findings indicate that co-injection of rAd5-rEA with rAd5-CEA improves anti-CEA CMI in a mainly dose-dependent manner.
Improved cytotoxic T cell responses against CEA following high-dose rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA co-administration
During the process of tumor cell killing, effector memory CD8+ T cells produce cytolytic and inflammatory cytokines in response to specific tumor-derived antigens [30, 31]. To quantify the amount of CEA-specific cytokine-producing CD8+ T cells, splenocytes were collected from naïve or vaccinated mice administered rAd5-CEA combined with an equal dose of either rAd5-rEA or rAd5-GFP. Splenocytes were stimulated ex vivo with either a CEA peptide pool or non-specific HIV-gag peptide. Splenocytes were analyzed by multicolor flow cytometry after subsequent fluorescent antibody extracellular staining against CD3 and CD8 and intracellular staining against IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, and perforin.
Upon CEA stimulation, 1 × 1010 vp rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA co-injection induced a significantly higher frequency of IFN-γ-expressing CD8+ T cells than those given rAd5-CEA and rAd5-GFP at all treatment doses, rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA at the 1 × 108 vp dose, and naïve mice (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2a). The highest dose of rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA also produced a higher frequency of TNF-α-producing CD8+ T cells than 1 × 108 and 1 × 109 vp rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP injected and naive mice (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2b). Quantity of intracellular perforin production within CD8+ T cells after CEA stimulation was significantly larger following 1 × 1010 vp rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA administration in comparison with all other treatment groups (p < 0.05 for 1 × 108 and 1 × 1010 vp rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP; p < 0.01 for all other groups) (Fig. 2c). No rAd5-treated groups induced significantly greater levels of CEA-specific, IL-2-producing CD8+ T cells than naïve animals (data not shown). Stimulation with the irrelevant HIV-gag peptides also did not produce significantly different amounts of anti-CEA cytokine-producing CD8+ T cells between naïve and rAd5 treatment groups (data not shown). These results suggest that the combination of rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA at a 1 × 1010 vp dose induces substantially more CEA-triggered activation of cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes.
To confirm that the improved anti-CEA CTL effects seen with rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA treatment were not biased due to unequal levels of CD8+ T cells following vaccination, the frequency of splenic CD8+ T cells was measured via flow cytometry from mice vaccinated with either rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP or rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA at previously utilized doses (1 × 108, 1 × 109, or 1 × 1010 vp). Importantly, no significant differences in the amount of CD8+ T cells were observed between naïve, rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP, or rAd5-CEA + rAd-rEA treatment groups (Supplemental Fig. 1).
Dose-dependent increase in anti-CEA IgG production following rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA co-administration
In addition to TAA-directed CMI, the generation of TAA-specific IgG antibodies is also an important aspect of effective cancer immunotherapy through participation in antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity [23]. Curiously, in our clinical trial using solely rAd5-CEA, we did not find notable changes in patient serum anti-CEA IgG following vaccination [8]. To measure whether the co-administration of rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA would induce greater anti-CEA IgG titers than rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP, mice were co-injected with either combination at a total viral dose of 1 × 108, 1 × 109, or 1 × 1010 vp. Serum was collected at 14 dpi and used to perform an anti-CEA IgG ELISA. We observed that at the 1 × 1010 vp dose, mice treated with rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA had significantly greater anti-CEA IgG titers than all other rAd5-CEA-treated mice (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3a). Serum was also used to measure anti-Ad5 IgG titers to evaluate whether vaccinated mice developed an antibody response against the vector itself. As seen with anti-CEA IgG, 1 × 1010 vp rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA induced a significantly greater titer of anti-Ad5 IgG than any of the other vaccine-treated mice (p < 0.01 for 1 × 1010 vp rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP and 1 × 109 vp rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA; p < 0.001 for all other treatments) (Fig. 3b), suggesting that rEA overexpression enhances B cell responses to all antigenic targets, including Ad-derived antigens. Moreover, the mice in the 1 × 109 vp rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA had higher amounts of anti-Ad5 IgG than both groups of 1 × 108 vp dosed mice (p < 0.05). This data suggests that high doses of rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA successfully induce substantial anti-CEA IgG production, while also producing greater levels of antibodies against the Ad5 vector.
To verify that the variances in antibody responses were not due to uneven amounts of IgG-producing B cells present following vaccination, B cells from mice co-injected with either rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP or rAd5-CEA + rAd-rEA at various doses (1 × 108, 1 × 109, or 1 × 1010 vp) were quantified and analyzed via flow cytometry. No significant differences in B cell numbers were found between naïve, rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP, and rAd5-CEA + rAd-rEA; independent of viral particle dose (Supplemental Fig. 2).
rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA co-injection enhances breadth of T cell-recognized CEA peptide epitopes
While it is important to have a strong memory response against a TAA, worth is also placed on the creation of an epitope-diverse response [32, 33]. Vaccine-induced recognition of a greater number of immunogenic antigen epitopes can possibly allow for superior protection in cases where some epitopes may be bypassed via tumor survival methods and intrinsic HLA haplotype differences [32, 33]. We have previously shown that the addition of rAd5-rEA to an HIV antigen-expressing Ad vaccine increased the breadth and quality of response against HIV antigen epitopes [19]; therefore, we wished to investigate whether rAd5-rEA could also improve the antigen epitope recognition of CEA.
To measure the range of CEA immunogenic areas following vaccination, we collected splenocytes isolated from mice injected with 1 × 1010 total vp of either rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA or rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP. Splenocytes were stimulated ex vivo with individual, 15 aa-long CEA peptides that encompassed the entirety of one of the CEA protein’s repeating domains in N- to C-terminal 10 aa overlaps and were numbered subsequently in that order (Supplemental Table 1). Using an IFN-γ ELISpot to measure CMI, we found several areas of epitope recognition following rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA vaccination (Fig. 4), as it produced significantly higher levels of IFN-γ-producing cells than naïve (p < 0.05 for peptides #8, 24, 25; p < 0.01 for peptide #31) and rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP vaccinated (p < 0.05 for peptides #24 and 25; p < 0.01 for peptide #8; p < 0.001 for peptide #31) mice following splenocyte stimulation with four distinct peptide epitopes. Independent of the particular CEA epitope, rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP was unable to produce significantly higher amounts of IFN-γ-producing cells than the other treatment groups, and for all treatment groups, most CEA epitopes produced SFC counts close to baseline (Supplemental Fig. 3). These results suggest that rAd5-rEA co-administration with rAd5-CEA allows for a diverse subset of CEA epitopes to be recognized by an adaptive CMI response.
rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA co-injection enhances diversity of anti-CEA IgG antibody-identified CEA peptide epitopes
While researchers have identified several T cell receptor-recognized CEA epitopes [34–36], there are presently none conclusively verified to be recognized by B cell-based receptors. In addition, previous vaccine prototypes targeting CEA have often been unable to induce measurable amounts of anti-CEA IgG antibodies within patients’ blood serum [8, 37]. We wished to see whether the supplementation of rAd5-rEA to a rAd5-CEA injection would allow for a more varied and detectable repertoire of CEA-binding IgG antibodies. To measure anti-CEA IgG diversity, we collected serum isolated from mice that had been injected with 1 × 1010 total vp of either rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA or rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP. Serum was pooled within treatment groups and plated on wells that were coated with the aforementioned individual 15mer CEA peptides (Supplemental Table 1). In identifying values above the baseline optical density (OD) of 0.2 (measured value in wells without serum plated), ELISA analysis revealed that both rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA and rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP treatments induced epitope recognition by anti-CEA IgG (Fig. 5), while naïve mice did not. However, in observing the number of CEA peptide epitopes recognized by rAd5-CEA-vaccinated mouse serum IgG, there were clearly more unique epitopes bound by immunoglobulins derived from mice given rAd5-rEA as compared to rAd5-GFP (28 and 2, respectively). Furthermore, in the instances where rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP vaccination did produce a significant amount of epitope-specific anti-CEA IgG, rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA vaccination always produced a substantially higher IgG titer against those same epitopes. These findings serve as a novel instance where adjuvant treatment alongside a CEA-targeted vaccine increased the breadth of anti-CEA B cell responses.
Enhanced in vivo CEA-targeted CTL killing following rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA co-administration
It is important to verify that the components of a multifaceted, robust memory response can be amplified against a TAA, but these constituents must also be functionally tested to validate their practical anti-tumorigenic actions. To measure the amount of CEA-specific cell killing that could be produced after the use of an adjuvant such as rEA, mice vaccinated 21 days prior with rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA or rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP, and Ad-naïve mice, were injected with equal amounts of CEA- or AMQ-pulsed syngeneic splenocytes, which had been labeled with high and low amounts of CFSE, respectively. Twenty-four hours following adoptive transfer of peptide-loaded, CFSE-labeled splenocytes, mice were killed and splenocytes were prepared for the measurement of the remaining CEA(CFSEHigh)- and AMQ(CFSELow)-pulsed cells. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that the ratios of CEA/AMQ cells were no different between naïve (Fig. 6a) and rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP (Fig. 6b) co-injected mice. In contrast, splenocytes derived from rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA-treated animals possessed a notably smaller ratio of CEA/AMQ cells (Fig. 6), indicating more potent in vivo cCEA-specific CTL activity. Calculation of the percentage of specific CEA cell killing revealed that all animals treated with rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA sustained some measurable level of specific cytotoxic lymphocyte killing, while none of the rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP co-injected animals could (p < 0.001) (Fig. 6d).
To investigate whether the extent of the anti-CEA T cell and B cell responses may be correlated, serum was collected at the same time as splenocyte collection and used to measure anti-CEA IgG by ELISA. Since rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP treatment produced no assessable CEA-specific killing, we only compared the killing percentages of rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA-treated animals to their respective anti-CEA IgG titers. Linear regression analysis revealed a significant, positive linear correlation (p = 0.0148; r = 0.8523) between the percent of CEA-specific killing and anti-CEA IgG titers (Fig. 6e). These findings suggest not only that the formulation of rAd5-CEA vaccine with rAd5-rEA allows for measurable, functional CEA-specific cell killing, but also that these actions correspond directly with levels of IgG antibodies against CEA.
Discussion
Creating a strong enough memory response against an often immune-tolerated TAA has been a persistent issue of the cancer immunotherapy field since its inception [38]. Alternatively, researchers have observed that immunogenic treatments that are too aggressive can induce severe systemic side effects, as was seen in the development of an inflammatory colitis following high-dose autologous T cell transfer [31]. Recombinant adenoviral delivery of tumor-associated antigens has become a popular immunotherapy method, leading to the exploration of many antigenic vaccine targets within numerous human clinical trials. This class of vectors serves as a desirable option due to their ability to efficiently and exceptionally promote T cell memory responses against expressed antigens, which is largely due to rAds’ ability to trigger multidimensional innate immune responses [16, 26, 39]. Recently, we have reported that the use of an adenovirus vector encoding the gene CEA (rAd5-CEA) can be safely administered to human subjects and may prolong survival of patients with advanced, chemotherapy-resistant colorectal cancers by inducing potent anti-CEA-specific T cell immunity [8]. In this current study, we wished to investigate whether the efficaciousness of this same vaccine could be further improved with the supplementation of a vector expressing the TLR agonist and anti-tumorigenic protein, rEA. The adjuvant properties and human safety profile of rEA have been previously established [17–19]; therefore, we felt that the characterization of rEA’s immunomodulatory effects on a TAA-based vaccine was warranted. Generally, our results found that increasing doses of rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA resulted in a greater amount of CEA immune recognition, including stronger CMI (as quantified by the amount of IFN-γ- and IL-2-secreting splenocytes), greater amounts of cytotoxic T cell activation (as measured by greater amounts of IFN-γ-, TNF-α,- and perforin-expressing CD8+ T cells), and higher anti-CEA IgG titers.
Interestingly, the amounts of IL-2 expressing CD8+ T cells from vaccinated mice were no greater those from naïve mice, which contrasts with the overall increased amounts of IL-2 expressing splenocytes following rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA vaccination. This finding may signify that other non-CD8+ splenocyte populations, such as CD4+ T cells, may be preferential IL-2 expressers in response to CEA recognition, a phenomena that has been observed in previous vaccine studies where broad antigen-specific CTL responses have been induced [40].
It has been observed that T cells from both healthy and tumor-burdened patients can respond to a wide range of CEA-derived antigens; it is a major therapeutic goal that vaccination against CEA may break down immunologic tolerance to these antigens [30, 41]. Vaccine trials where a single CEA epitope was targeted have cited having to exclude many patients who did not meet HLA-matching criteria [42], limiting the vaccine’s treatable population. Alternatively, a strong, multiregional repertoire of antigen epitopes could allow for a greater incidence of efficacy across different HLA backgrounds and against multiple variants of CEA-expressing malignancies [32, 33]. We tested whether the adjuvant activities of rAd5-rEA could not only increase the response to individual CEA-derived antigens, but also broaden this type of response to greater numbers of CEA-derived antigens when paired with the rAd5-CEA vaccine. We found that inclusion of a rEA-expressing vector along with a CEA-targeting vaccine induced substantial CMI against several distinct CEA-derived peptides, including four documented epitopes previously shown to be directly recognized by three distinct HLA haplotypes [34–36]. Interestingly, these haplotypes include class I and II HLAs, suggesting that rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA co-vaccination may have the potential to activate not only CEA-directed CD8+ T cells, but also effector CD4+ T cells, the numbers of which have been found to be strongly and positively correlated with improved clinical outcomes of advanced malignancy patients [43]. However, verification of these notions will require further study in a humanized murine model or human subjects.
While the importance of anti-TAA IgG development has been well established [2], many CEA-targeting vaccine prototypes have been found to be unable to induce anti-CEA IgG production above pre-treatment levels [8, 37]. In our work, while rAd5-CEA vaccination alone was a weak inducer of anti-CEA humoral immunity [8], the combination of rAd5-CEA with rAd5-rEA was able to create a significant amount of circulating serum anti-CEA IgG to several peptide epitopes of CEA. According to the Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource (www.iedb.org), there are over 100 confirmed immune epitopes derived from human CEA protein, but as of yet none have been confirmed by B cell response assay, making further investigation into the humoral promotion that rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA could provide even more important. To determine exact MHC-epitope immunogenicity and affinities induced by this vaccine regimen, a cold target inhibition assay would also be helpful to use in forthcoming studies.
Furthermore, rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA-vaccinated animals also showed markedly higher levels of CEA-specific killing, with the amount of CEA-specific in vivo CTL killing in rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA-vaccinated animals being positively correlated with the amount of anti-CEA IgG detected in their serum. This suggests that induction of humoral- and/or cell-mediated adaptive immune responses against TAAs such as CEA are not mutually exclusive and can be promoted alongside each other using potent adjuvants such as rEA. While none of the mice administered rAd5-CEA + rAd5-GFP were able to induce greater amounts of CEA-specific cell killing over mock-injected mice in this study, previous murine and human experiments using rAd5-CEA have shown it to promote robust killing of CEA-expressing tumor cells [7, 8]. Thus, it may be likely that high levels of CEA-specific cell killing are only initiated when the number of vaccinations administered is increased, as three separate vector inoculations were administered during the rAd5-CEA murine and human trials [7, 8]. Future studies are merited to further explore dosing kinetics of the rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA vaccination schema.
The molecular mechanisms by which innate immune modulators, such as rEA, assist in the development of a strong immunologic memory response are still in the process of being understood [44]. Many of the identified characteristics that make an adjuvant effective have been detected in rEA, such as promotion of NK cell activation, increased amounts of DC activation/maturation, induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-12(p70), TNF-α), and an overall robust Th1-skewing response [17, 19, 20, 45]. rEA also promotes relatively unique agonist signaling mechanics in that it uses the TLR adapter protein MyD88 as a positive regulator, and yet another TLR adapter, TRIF, as a negative regulator [45]. While there have been previous concerns regarding rEA’s immunogenicity as a profilin-like protein to be limited to mammals that express functional TLR11/12, clinical trials and ex vivo human studies have assuaged much of this concern, revealing there to be many TLR11/12-independent mechanisms by which rEA triggers human immunity [17, 18, 20]. Moreover, it has been recently confirmed that human PBMC recognition of profilin is instead dependent on TLR5 [46], thereby suggesting that rEA may be recognized by this PRR as well. We have also previously shown that rEA can directly activate human NK cells [20], a critical subtype of innate immune cells that perform anti-tumor immune activities [47]. Furthermore, rEA has been verified as safe to administer to human patients, even those who may have advanced malignancies with compromised immune systems [17, 18], an attribute that is lacking for many other innate immune agonists [48].
With the knowledge that rEA is a robust innate stimulator, we explored the scope of adaptive immunity that it could affect. Our previous work has revealed that the adjuvant effects rAd5-rEA possesses are target-specific, with injections of rAd5-rEA alone inducing no specific adaptive immune responses without a co-injected rAd5-transgene to direct its boosting properties toward [19]. While we have previously shown rAd5-rEA to promote transgene immunity against the HIV-gag protein [19], this is the first time that co-injection of it with a TAA-expressing Ad has been shown to have similar benefits. Furthermore, the importance of gut microbiota (of which rEA is derived) and innate activation has been shown to be essential in response to several chemotherapy treatments [49, 50], suggesting the use of rAd5-CEA + rAd5-rEA alongside these medications may provide a substantially better clinical outcome without making the treatment regimen more physically rigorous for the patient. As phase II trials have already shown significant preliminary success with the use of rAd5-CEA in advanced colorectal cancer patients, it is exceedingly relevant that an adjuvant which would enhance anti-tumor effect to an even greater extent be considered. All in all, rAd5-rEA has the possibility of serving as a conduit to a much larger and more diverse immune response against CEA and a multitude of other TAA-expressing malignancies.
Abbreviations
- μg:
-
Microgram(s)
- μL:
-
Microliter(s)
- μM:
-
Micromolar
- ANOVA:
-
Analysis of variance
- APC:
-
Antigen-presenting cell
- CA-125:
-
Cancer antigen 125
- cDNA:
-
Complementary deoxyribonucleic acid
- CD:
-
Cluster of differentiation
- CEA:
-
Carcinoembryonic antigen
- CFSE:
-
Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester
- CMI:
-
Cell-mediated immunity
- CTL:
-
Cytotoxic T lymphocyte
- DC:
-
Dendritic cell
- dpi:
-
Days post-injection
- ELISA:
-
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
- ELISpot:
-
Enzyme-linked immunospot
- FACS:
-
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting
- Fc:
-
Fragment crystallizable
- GFP:
-
Green fluorescent protein
- HIV:
-
Human immunodeficiency virus
- HLA:
-
Human leukocyte antigen
- HRP:
-
Horseradish peroxidase
- IgG:
-
Immunoglobulin G
- IL:
-
Interleukin
- IFN-γ:
-
Interferon gamma
- IM:
-
Intramuscularly
- MyD88:
-
Myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88
- nm:
-
Nanometer(s)
- NK:
-
Natural killer
- NKT:
-
Natural killer T
- OD:
-
Optical density
- PBMC:
-
Peripheral blood mononuclear cell
- PBS:
-
Phosphate-buffered saline
- PCR:
-
Polymerase chain reaction
- PRR:
-
Pattern recognition receptor
- rAd5:
-
Recombinant adenovirus serotype 5
- rEA:
-
Recombinant Eimeria antigen
- SFC:
-
Spot-forming cell
- TAA:
-
Tumor-associated antigen
- Th:
-
T helper
- TLR:
-
Toll-like receptor
- TMB:
-
Tetramethylbenzidine
- TNF-α:
-
Tumor necrosis factor alpha
- TRIF:
-
TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β
- vp:
-
Viral particle(s)
References
Kantoff PW, Higano CS, Shore ND et al (2010) Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 363:411–422. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1001294
Cheever MA, Allison JP, Ferris AS et al (2009) The prioritization of cancer antigens: a National Cancer Institute Pilot Project for the acceleration of translational research. Clin Cancer Res 15:5323–5337. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0737
Marshall JL, Gulley JL, Arlen PM et al (2005) Phase I study of sequential vaccinations with fowlpox-CEA(6D)-TRICOM alone and sequentially with vaccinia-CEA(6D)-TRICOM, with and without granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, in patients with carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing carcinomas. J Clin Oncol 23:720–731. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.10.206
Bilusic M, Heery CR, Arlen PM et al (2014) Phase I trial of a recombinant yeast-CEA vaccine (GI-6207) in adults with metastatic CEA-expressing carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother 63:225–234. doi:10.1007/s00262-013-1505-8
Morse MA, Clay TM, Hobeika AC et al (2005) Phase I study of immunization with dendritic cells modified with fowlpox encoding carcinoembryonic antigen and costimulatory molecules. Clin Cancer Res 11:3017–3024. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2172
Ullenhag GJ, Frödin J-E, Jeddi-Tehrani M et al (2004) Durable carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-specific humoral and cellular immune responses in colorectal carcinoma patients vaccinated with recombinant CEA and granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Clin Cancer Res 10:3273–3281. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0706
Gabitzsch E, Xu Y, Balint J et al (2010) Anti-tumor immunotherapy despite immunity to adenovirus using a novel adenoviral vector Ad5 [E1-, E2b-]-CEA. Cancer Immunol Immunother 59:1131–1135. doi:10.1007/s00262-010-0847-8
Morse MA, Chaudhry A, Gabitzsch ES et al (2013) Novel adenoviral vector induces T-cell responses despite anti-adenoviral neutralizing antibodies in colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother 62:1293–1301. doi:10.1007/s00262-013-1400-3
Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A et al (2013) Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 381:303–312. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61900-X
Gerner MY, Casey KA, Mescher MF (2008) Defective MHC class II presentation by dendritic cells limits CD4 T cell help for antitumor CD8 T cell responses. J Immunol 181:155–164. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.181.1.155
Stoitzner P, Green LK, Jung JY et al (2008) Inefficient presentation of tumor-derived antigen by tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother 57:1665–1673. doi:10.1007/s00262-008-0487-4
Hartman ZC, Osada T, Glass O et al (2010) Ligand-independent toll-like receptor signals generated by ectopic overexpression of MyD88 generate local and systemic antitumor immunity. Cancer Res 70:7209–7220. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0905
Yang Y, Huang C-T, Huang X, Pardoll DM (2004) Persistent toll-like receptor signals are required for reversal of regulatory T cell-mediated CD8 tolerance. Nat Immunol 5:508–515. doi:10.1038/ni1059
Clements CJ, Griffiths E (2002) The global impact of vaccines containing aluminium adjuvants. Vaccine 20(Suppl 3):S24–S33. doi:10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00168-8
Wille-Reece U, Flynn BJ, Loré K et al (2006) Toll-like receptor agonists influence the magnitude and quality of memory T cell responses after prime-boost immunization in nonhuman primates. J Exp Med 203:1249–1258. doi:10.1084/jem.20052433
Ishii KJ, Akira S (2007) Toll or toll-free adjuvant path toward the optimal vaccine development. J Clin Immunol 27:363–371. doi:10.1007/s10875-007-9087-x
Rosenberg B, Juckett DA, Aylsworth CF et al (2005) Protein from intestinal Eimeria protozoan stimulates IL-12 release from dendritic cells, exhibits antitumor properties in vivo and is correlated with low intestinal tumorigenicity. Int J Cancer 114:756–765. doi:10.1002/ijc.20801
Rader JS, Aylsworth CF, Juckett DA et al (2008) Phase I study and preliminary pharmacology of the novel innate immune modulator rBBX-01 in gynecologic cancers. Clin Cancer Res 14:3089–3097. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4250
Appledorn DM, Aldhamen YA, Depas W et al (2010) A new adenovirus based vaccine vector expressing an Eimeria tenella derived TLR agonist improves cellular immune responses to an antigenic target. PLoS One 5:e9579. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009579
Aylsworth CF, Aldhamen YA, Seregin SS et al (2013) Activation of human natural killer cells by the novel innate immune modulator recombinant Eimeria antigen. Hum Immunol 74:916–926. doi:10.1016/j.humimm.2013.04.035
He T-C, Zhou S, da Costa LT et al (1998) A simplified system for generating recombinant adenoviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95:2509–2514. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.5.2509
Schuldt NJ, Aldhamen YA, Appledorn DM et al (2011) Vaccine platforms combining circumsporozoite protein and potent immune modulators, rEA or EAT-2, paradoxically result in opposing immune responses. PLoS One 6:e24147. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024147
Morse MA, Hobeika AC, Osada T et al (2010) An alphavirus vector overcomes the presence of neutralizing antibodies and elevated numbers of Tregs to induce immune responses in humans with advanced cancer. J Clin Invest 120:3234–3241. doi:10.1172/JCI42672
Ng P, Graham FL (2002) Construction of first-generation adenoviral vectors. Methods Mol Med 69:389–414. doi:10.1385/1-59259-141-8:389
Seregin SS, Appledorn DM, McBride AJ et al (2009) Transient pretreatment with glucocorticoid ablates innate toxicity of systemically delivered adenoviral vectors without reducing efficacy. Mol Ther 17:685–696. doi:10.1038/mt.2008.297
Appledorn DM, Patial S, McBride A et al (2008) Adenovirus vector-induced innate inflammatory mediators, MAPK signaling, as well as adaptive immune responses are dependent upon both TLR2 and TLR9 in vivo. J Immunol 181:2134–2144. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.181.3.2134
Aldhamen YA, Seregin SS, Kousa YA et al (2013) Improved cytotoxic T-lymphocyte immune responses to a tumor antigen by vaccines co-expressing the SLAM-associated adaptor EAT-2. Cancer Gene Ther 20:564–575. doi:10.1038/cgt.2013.53
Aldhamen YA, Appledorn DM, Seregin SS et al (2011) Expression of the SLAM family of receptors adapter EAT-2 as a novel strategy for enhancing beneficial immune responses to vaccine antigens. J Immunol 186:722–732. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1002105
Appledorn DM, McBride A, Seregin S et al (2008) Complex interactions with several arms of the complement system dictate innate and humoral immunity to adenoviral vectors. Gene Ther 15:1606–1617. doi:10.1038/gt.2008
Zhu MZ, Marshall J, Cole D et al (2000) Specific cytolytic T-cell responses to human CEA from patients immunized with recombinant avipox-CEA vaccine. Clin Cancer Res 6:24–33
Parkhurst MR, Yang JC, Langan RC et al (2011) T cells targeting carcinoembryonic antigen can mediate regression of metastatic colorectal cancer but induce severe transient colitis. Mol Ther 19:620–626. doi:10.1038/mt.2010.272
Kawashima I, Hudson SJ, Tsai V et al (1998) The multi-epitope approach for immunotherapy for cancer: identification of several CTL epitopes from various tumor-associated antigens expressed on solid epithelial tumors. Hum Immunol 59:1–14. doi:10.1016/S0198-8859(97)00255-3
Lehmann F, Marchand M, Hainaut P et al (1995) Differences in the antigens recognized by cytolytic T cells on two successive metastases of a melanoma patient are consistent with immune selection. Eur J Immunol 25:340–347. doi:10.1002/eji.1830250206
Nukaya I, Yasumoto M, Iwasaki T et al (1999) Identification of HLA-A24 epitope peptides of carcinoembryonic antigen which induce tumor-reactive cytotoxic T lymphocyte. Int J Cancer 80:92–97. doi:10.1054/bjoc.2000.1715
Ruiz M, Kobayashi H, Lasarte JJ et al (2004) Identification and characterization of a T-helper peptide from carcinoembryonic antigen. Clin Cancer Res 10:2860–2867. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0476
Kobayashi H, Omiya R, Ruiz M et al (2002) Identification of an antigenic epitope for helper T lymphocytes from carcinoembryonic antigen. Clin Cancer Res 8:3219–3225
Kaufman HL, Lenz H-J, Marshall J et al (2008) Combination chemotherapy and ALVAC-CEA/B7.1 vaccine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14:4843–4849. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0276
Yu Z, Theoret MR, Touloukian CE et al (2004) Poor immunogenicity of a self/tumor antigen derives from peptide-MHC-I instability and is independent of tolerance. J Clin Invest 114:551–559. doi:10.1172/JCI21695
Hartman ZC, Appledorn DM, Amalfitano A (2008) Adenovirus vector induced innate immune responses: impact upon efficacy and toxicity in gene therapy and vaccine applications. Virus Res 132:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.virusres.2007.10.005
Bråve A, Boberg A, Gudmundsdotter L et al (2007) A new multi-clade DNA prime/recombinant MVA boost vaccine induces broad and high levels of HIV-1-specific CD8+ T-cell and humoral responses in mice. Mol Ther 15:1724–1733. doi:10.1038/sj.mt.6300235
Crosti M, Longhi R, Consogno G et al (2006) Identification of novel subdominant epitopes on the carcinoembryonic antigen recognized by CD4+ T cells of lung cancer patients. J Immunol 176:5093–5099. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.176.8.5093
Geynisman DM, Zha Y, Kunnavakkam R et al (2013) A randomized pilot phase I study of modified carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) peptide (CAP1-6D)/montanide/GM-CSF-vaccine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Immunother Cancer 1:8. doi:10.1186/2051-1426-1-8
Peguillet I, Milder M, Louis D et al (2014) High numbers of differentiated effector CD4 T cells are found in patients with cancer and correlate with clinical response after neoadjuvant therapy of breast cancer. Cancer Res 74:2204–2216. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2269
Coffman RL, Sher A, Seder RA (2010) Vaccine adjuvants: putting innate immunity to work. Immunity 33:492–503. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2010.10.002
Seregin SS, Aldhamen YA, Appledorn DM et al (2011) TRIF is a critical negative regulator of TLR agonist mediated activation of dendritic cells in vivo. PLoS One 6:e22064. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022064
Salazar Gonzalez RM, Shehata H, O’Connell MJ et al (2014) Toxoplasma gondii- derived profilin triggers human toll-like receptor 5-dependent cytokine production. J Innate Immun 6:685–694. doi:10.1159/000362367
Vivier E, Raulet DH, Moretta A et al (2011) Innate or adaptive immunity? the example of natural killer cells. Science 331:44–49. doi:10.1126/science.1198687
Alexander C, Rietschel ET (2001) Bacterial lipopolysaccharides and innate immunity. J Endotoxin Res 7:167–202. doi:10.1177/09680519010070030101
Iida N, Dzutsev A, Stewart CA et al (2013) Commensal bacteria control cancer response to therapy by modulating the tumor microenvironment. Science 342:967–970. doi:10.1126/science.1240527
Viaud S, Saccheri F, Mignot G et al (2013) The intestinal microbiota modulates the anticancer immune effects of cyclophosphamide. Science 342:971–976. doi:10.1126/science.1240537
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank the personnel in Michigan State University’s laboratory animal support facilities for their assistance in the humane care of animals utilized in this work. Dr. Andrea Amalfitano was supported by the Michigan State University Osteopathic Heritage Foundation.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quiroga, D., Aldhamen, Y.A., Appledorn, D.M. et al. Strengthened tumor antigen immune recognition by inclusion of a recombinant Eimeria antigen in therapeutic cancer vaccination. Cancer Immunol Immunother 64, 479–491 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-015-1659-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-015-1659-7