Skip to main content
Log in

Ephemeral injuries, regeneration frequencies, and intensity of the injury-producing process

  • Method
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organisms may suffer sublethal injuries that lead to the loss of body parts and that leave either permanent or ephemeral scars, and these can be used to understand some aspects of the injury-producing processes, such as predation. It has been shown theoretically that for injuries that leave detectable scars throughout life, proportion of injured individuals in a population reflects the probability of fatal incidents rather than the intensity of the injury-producing process itself (Schoener in Ecology 60:1110–1115, 1979). When injuries are ephemeral and leave no detectable signature, it is shown here that frequencies of injury are a function of the intensity of the injury-producing process. Moreover, if the probability of fatality from the injury-producing process is low, as would be the case for partial or cropping predation, regeneration frequencies can be used to infer the intensity of the injury-producing process if the rate of regeneration is known.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronson RB (1987) Predation on fossil and recent ophiuroids. Paleobiology 13:187–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson RB (1989) A community-level test of the Mesozoic marine revolution theory. Paleobiology 15:20–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson RB (1991) Predation, physical disturbance, and sublethal arm damage in ophiuroids: a Jurassic-recent comparison. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 74:91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumiller TK, Gahn FJ (2004) Testing predation-driven evolution using mid-Paleozoic crinoid arm regeneration. Science 305:1453–1455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baumiller TK, Gahn FJ (2013) Reconstructing predation pressure on crinoids: estimating arm-loss rates from regenerating arms. Paleobiology 39:40–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bely AE, Nyberg KG (2010) Evolution of animal regeneration: re-emergence of a field. Trends Ecol Evol 25:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgoin A, Guillou M (1994) Arm regeneration in two populations of Acrocnida brachiata (Montagu) (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) in Douarnenez Bay (Brittany: France): an ecological significance. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 184:123–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowmer T, Keegan BF (1983) Field survey of the occurrence and significance of regeneration in Amphiura filiformis (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) from Galway Bay, west coast of Ireland. Mar Biol 74:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RA, Nizinski MS, Ross SW, Sulak KJ (2007) Frequency of sublethal injury in a deepwater ophiuroid, Ophiacantha bidentata, an important component of western Atlantic Lophelia reef communities. Mar Biol 152:307–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candia Carnevali MD (2006) Regeneration in echinoderms: repair, regrowth, cloning. Invertebr Surv J 3:64–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements LAJ, Fielman KT, Stancyk SE (1988) Regeneration by an amphiurid brittlestar exposed to different concentrations of dissolved organic material. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 122:47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements LAJ, Bell SS, Kurdziel JP (1994) Abundance and arm loss of the infaunal brittlestar Ophiophragmus filograneus (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea), with an experimental determination of regeneration rates in natural and planted seagrass beds. Mar Biol 121:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolmatov IY (1999) Regeneration in echinoderms. Rus J Mar Biol 25:225–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Emson RH, Wilkie IC (1980) Fission and autotomy in echinoderms. Oceanogr Mar Biol A Rev 18:155–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielman KT, Stancyk SE, Dobson WE, Clements LAJ (1991) Effects of disc and arm loss on regeneration by Microphiopholis gracillima (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) in nutrient-free seawater. Mar Biol 111:121–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming PA, Muller D, Bateman PW (2007) Leave it all behind: a taxonomic perspective of autotomy in invertebrates. Biol Rev 82:481–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gahn FJ, Baumiller TK (2005) Arm regeneration in Mississippian crinoids-evidence of intense predation pressure in the Paleozoic? Paleobiology 31:151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gahn FJ, Baumiller TK (2010) Evolutionary history of regeneration in crinoids (Echinodermata). Integr Comp Biol 50:514a–514m

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence JM, Vasquez J (1996) The effect of sublethal predation on the biology of echinoderms. Oceanol Acta 19:431–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay SM (2010) Frequency of injury and the ecology of regeneration in marine benthic invertebrates. Integr Comp Biol 50:479–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer DL (1985) Evolutionary implications of predation on recent comatulid crinoids from the Great Barrier Reef. Paleobiology 11:154–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer DL, Ausich WI (1983) Biotic interactions among recent and fossil crinoids. In: Tevesz MFS, McCall PL (eds) Biotic interactions in recent and fossil benthic communities. Plenum, New York, pp 377–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Munday BW (1993) Field survey of the occurrence and significance of regeneration in Amphiura chiajei (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) from Killary Habrour, west coast of Ireland. Mar Biol 115:661–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtaugh PA (1981) Inferring properties of mysid predation from injuries to Daphnia. Limnol Oceanogr 26:811–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oji T (2001) Fossil record of echinoderm regeneration with special regard to crinoids. Microsc Res Tech 55:397–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pape-Lindstrom PA, Feller RJ, Stancyk SE, Woodin SA (1997) Sublethal predation: field measurements of arm tissue loss from the ophiuroid Microphiopholis gracillima and immunochemical identification of its predators in North Inlet, South Carolina, USA. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 156:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomory CM, Lawrence JM (1999) Effect of arm regeneration on energy storage and gonad production in Ophiocoma echinata (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). Mar Biol 135:57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1979) Inferring the properties of predation and other injury-producing agents from injury frequencies. Ecology 60:1110–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sköld M, Gunnarsson JSG (1996) Somatic and germinal growth of the infaunal brittle stars Amphiura filiformis and A. chiajei in response to organic enrichment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 142:203–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stancyk SE, Golde HM, Pape-Lindstrom PA, Dobson WE (1994) Born to lose. I. Measures of tissue loss and regeneration by the brittlestar Microphiopholis gracillima (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). Mar Biol 118:451–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndyke MC, Chen WC, Beesley PW, Patruno M (2001) Molecular approach to echinoderm regeneration. Microsc Res Tech 55:474–485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie IC (2001) Autotomy as a prelude to regeneration in echinoderms. Microsc Res Tech 55:369–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially funded by grants from the National Science Foundation (DEB 1036393; EAR 0824793), the National Geographic Society (NGS 8505-08; NGS 9283-13). The author thanks three anonymous reviewers for insightful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomasz K. Baumiller.

Additional information

Communicated by U. Sommer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baumiller, T.K. Ephemeral injuries, regeneration frequencies, and intensity of the injury-producing process. Mar Biol 160, 3233–3239 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-013-2302-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-013-2302-9

Keywords

Navigation