Journal of Evolutionary Economics

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 499–517 | Cite as

Sectoral patterns of firm exit in Italian provinces

  • Martin A. Carree
  • Ingrid Verheul
  • Enrico SantarelliEmail author
Regular Article


There is considerable variation in the firm exit rate across the 103 provinces in Italy. This paper investigates a range of determinants of the exit rate for twelve different sectors in the Italian provinces for a period of eleven years. The analysis shows that the exit rate is positively affected by entry in the previous year (displacement) in the same sector. Previous exit has a different effect for the manufacturing industry as compared to the business services. More specifically, exit persists in manufacturing while in the business services it is rather exit in related sectors in the same province that leads to increased exit, probably due to the loss of clients or suppliers. The presence of industrial districts diminishes exit, especially in two manufacturing sectors (Food and Clothing), Commerce and Transport. Provinces with strong trademark activity appear to have lower exit rates.


Firm exit Manufacturing Services Italian provinces 

JEL Classification

L60 L80 R12 R23 


  1. Abdesselam R, Bonnet J, Le Pape N (2004) An explanation of the life span of new French firms. Small Bus Econ 23:237–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs ZJ, Armington C, Zhang T (2007) The determinants of new-firm survival across regional economies: the role of human capital stock and knowledge spillover. Pap Reg Sci 3(86):367–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agarwal R (1998) Small firm survival and technological activity. Small Bus Econ 11:215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agarwal R, Gort M (1996) The evolution of markets and entry, exit and survival of firms. Rev Econ Stat 78:489–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aiginger K (1996) Confronting the implications of the Cournot model with industry and firm data. Small Bus Econ 8:365–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Audretsch DB (1991) New-firm survival and the technological regime. Rev Econ Stat 73:441–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Audretsch DB (1995) Innovation and industry evolution. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartelsman EJ, Scarpetta S, Schivardi F (2005) Comparative analysis of firm demographics and survival: micro-level evidence for the OECD countries. Ind Corp Change 14:365–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baum JAC, Haveman HA (1997) Love thy neighbor? Differentiation and agglomeration in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1990. Adm Sci Q 42:304–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bresnahan TF, Reiss PC (1991) Entry and competition in concentrated markets. J Polit Econ 99:977–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brixy U, Grotz R (2007) Regional patterns and determinants of birth and survival of new firms in Western Germany. Entrep Reg Dev 19:293–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buzzelli M (2005) What explains firm transience in housebuilding? A regional analysis of Ontario, Canada, 1991 and 1996. Reg Stud 39(6):699–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Callejón M, Segarra A (1999) Business dynamics and efficiency in industries and regions: the case of Spain. Small Bus Econ 13:253-271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carree M, Thurik R (1996) Entry and exit in retailing: incentives, barriers, displacement and replacement. Rev Ind Organ 35:59–80Google Scholar
  15. Carree M, Dejardin M (2007) Entry thresholds and actual entry and exit in local markets. Small Business Economics 29:203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carree M, Santarelli S, Verheul I (2008) Firm entry and exit in Italian provinces and the relationship with unemployment. Int Entrep Manag J 4:171–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carree MA, Piergiovanni R, Santarelli E, Verheul I (2009) Policies fostering new firm formation and self-employment in Italy: an empirical exercise. In: Baptista R, Leitao J (eds) Public policies for fostering entrepreneurship. Springer, New York, pp 15–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cefis E, Marsili O (2005) A matter of life and death: innovation and firm survival. Ind Corp Change 14(6):1167–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cefis E, Marsili O (2006) Innovation premium and the survival of entrepreneurial firms in the Netherlands. In: Santarelli E (ed) Entrepreneurship, growth and innovation: the dynamics of firms and industries. International studies in entrepreneurship, vol 12. Springer, New York, pp 183–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Colombo MG, Delmastro M, Grilli L (2004) Entrepreneurs’ human capital and the start-up size of new technology-based firms. Int J Ind Organ 22(8–9):1183–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crescenzi R, Rodriguez-Pose A (2008) Infrastructure endowment and investment as determinants of regional growth in the European Union. EIB Papers 13(2):62–101Google Scholar
  22. Dejardin M (2004) Sectoral and cross-sectoral effects of retailing firm demographics. Ann Reg Sci 38:311–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ebensberger B, Marsili O, Reichstein T, Salter A (2008) Fortune favours the brave. The distribution of innovative returns in Finland, the Netherlands and the UK. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 19:357–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fertala N (2008) The shadow of death: do regional differences matter for firm survival across native and immigrant entrepreneurs? Empirica 35:59–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fotopoulos G, Louri H (2000) Location and survival of new entry. Small Bus Econ 14:311–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fritsch M, Brixy U, Falck O (2006) The effect of industry, region, and time on new business survival. Rev Ind Organ 28:285–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geroski PA (1995) What do we know about entry? Int J Ind Organ 13(4):421–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gimeno J, Folta TB, Cooper AC, Woo CY (1997) Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Adm Sci Q 42:750–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gullstrand J (2005) Industry dynamics in the Swedish textile and wearing apparel sector. Rev Ind Organ 26:349–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Honjo Y (2000) Business failure of new firms: an empirical analysis using a multiplicative hazards model. Int J Ind Organ 18:557–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Horvath M, Schivardi F, Woywode M (2001) On industry life-cycles: delay, entry, and shakeout in beer brewing. Int J Ind Organ 19:1023–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ilmakunnas P, Topi J (1999) Microeconomic and macroeconomic influences on entry and exit of firms. Rev Ind Organ 15:283–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. InfoCamere (1996) Movimprese—Variazioni Annuali nell’Anagrafe delle Imprese Italiane. Unioncamere, RomaGoogle Scholar
  34. ISTAT (2008) La misura dell’occupazione non regolare nelle stime di contabilità nazionale, Conti Nazionali—Statistiche in breve. ISTAT, RomaGoogle Scholar
  35. Jensen PH, Webster E, Buddelmeyer H (2008) Innovation, technological conditions and new firm survival. Econ Rec 84(267):434–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson P, Parker S (1994) The interrelationships between births and deaths. Small Bus Econ 6:283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnson P, Parker S (1996) Spatial variations in the determinants and effects of firm births and deaths. Reg Stud 30(7):679–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kleijweg AJM, Lever MHC (1996) Entry and exit in Dutch manufacturing industries. Rev Ind Organ 11:375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Klepper S (1996) Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. Am Econ Rev 86(3):562–583Google Scholar
  40. Lin P-C, Huang D-S (2008) Technological regimes and firm survival: evidence across sectors. Small Bus Econ 30:175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lin Z, Picot G, Compton J (2001) The entry and exit dynamics of self-employment in Canada. Small Bus Econ 15:105–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mendonça S, Pereira TS, Godinho MM (2004) Trademarks as an indicator of innovation and industrial change. Res Policy 33:1385–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Menzel M-P, Fornahl D (2010) Cluster life cycles—dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution. Ind Corp Change 19(1):205–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nyström K (2007a) An industry disaggregated analysis of the determinants of regional entry and exit. Ann Reg Sci 41:877–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nyström K (2007b) Patterns and determinants of entry and exit in industrial sectors in Sweden. J Int Entrep 5:85–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pe’er A, Vertinsky I (2008) Firm exits as a determinant of firm entry: is there evidence of local creative destruction? J Bus Venturing 23:280–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rabellotti R, Carabelli A, Hirsch G (2009) Italian industrial districts on the move: where are they going? Eur Plan Stud 17(1):19–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Roberts BM, Thompson S (2003) Entry and exit in a transition economy: the case of Poland. Rev Ind Organ 22:225–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Santarelli E (2000) The duration of new firms in banking: an application of Cox regression analysis. Empir Econ 25:315–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Santarelli E, Piergiovanni R (1995) The determinants of firm start-up and entry in Italian producer services. Small Bus Econ 7:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Santarelli E, Vivarelli M (2007) Entrepreneurship and the process of firm’s entry, survival and growth. Ind Corp Change 16:455–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Santarelli E, Carree M, Verheul I (2009) Unemployment and firm entry and exit: an update on a controversial relationship. Reg Stud 43:1061–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Staber U (2001) Spatial proximity and firm survival in a declining industrial district: the case of knitwear firms in Baden-Württemberg. Reg Stud 35(4):329–341Google Scholar
  54. Strotmann H (2007) Entrepreneurial survival. Small Bus Econ 28:87–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Westhead P (1995) Survival and employment growth contrasts between types of owner-managed high-technology firms. Entrep Theory Pract 20(1):5–27Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin A. Carree
    • 1
  • Ingrid Verheul
    • 2
  • Enrico Santarelli
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.UM School of Business and EconomicsMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Rotterdam School of ManagementErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations