Advertisement

Empirical Economics

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 1107–1135 | Cite as

Accelerating the transition to employment at benefit exhaustion: still possible after four years of unemployment?

  • Lars Pico Geerdsen
  • Stéphanie Vincent Lyk-Jensen
  • Cecilie Dohlmann Weatherall
Article
  • 100 Downloads

Abstract

This paper provides evidence of how the long-term unemployed react to the threat of running out of unemployment insurance (UI) after receiving it for nearly 4 years. To identify the effect of UI exhaustion, we make use of a 1999 Danish legislative change that progressively reduced potential benefit duration from 5 to 4 years. We find that shortening UI duration hastens the transition to employment throughout the unemployment spell up to benefit exhaustion even if it occurs as long as 4 years later. However, although the proportional effect is large, it is small in absolute value.

Keywords

Unemployment duration Benefit entitlement Unemployment insurance UI exhaustion Shortening of UI 

JEL Classification

C41 J65 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Michael Svarer, Jan Høgelund, Steven Jenkins, Brian Krogh Graversen, David Grubb, Anders Holm, Ismir Mulalic, and Bo Honoré for helpful comments and Natalie Reid for thoroughly rereading the paper and providing valuable language usage assistance. We would also like to thank an anonymous editor. Next, we are grateful to Aske Egsgaard-Pedersen for research assistance and to participants at EALE 2013 and the SFI Advisory Research Board for comments and suggestions. We also acknowledge financial support from the Strategic Programme for Welfare Research.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Addison JT, Portugal P (2004) How does the unemployment insurance system shape the time profile of jobless duration? Econ Lett 85:229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergström R, Edin P (1992) Time aggregation and the distributional shape of unemployment duration. J Appl Econ 7:5–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boone J, Van Ours JC (2012) Why is there a spike in the job finding rate at benefit exhaustion? De Economist 160:413–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burdett K (1979) Unemployment insurance as a search subsidy: a theoretical analysis. Econ Inq 17:333–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caliendo M, Tatsiramos K, Uhlendorff A (2013) Benefit duration, unemployment duration and job match quality: a regression discontinuity approach. J Appl Econom 28:604–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Card D, Chetty R, Weber A (2007) The spike at benefit exhaustion: leaving the unemployment system or starting a new job? Am Econ Rev 97:113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Card D, Levine PB (2000) Extended benefits and the duration of UI spells: evidence from the New Jersey extended benefit program. J Public Econ 78:107–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carling K, Edin PA, Harkman A, Holmlund B (1996) Unemployment duration, unemployment benefits, and labor market programs in Sweden. J Public Econ 59:313–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Addio AC, Rosholm M (2005) Exits from temporary jobs in Europe: a competing risks analysis. Labour Econ 12:449–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DØRS (2007) Dansk Økonomi, forår 2007, kapitel III Dansk arbejdsmarkedspolitik efter år 2000 [The Danish economy, Spring 2007, Chapter III The Danish labour market after 2000] Copenhagen: DØRSGoogle Scholar
  11. Filges T, Geerdsen L P, Knudsen A-S D, Jørgensen A-M K, Kowalski K (2013) Unemployment benefit exhaustion: incentive effects on job finding rates: a systematic review. Campbell Syst Rev 4Google Scholar
  12. Fortin B, Lacroix G, Drolet S (2004) Welfare benefits and the duration of welfare spells: evidence from a natural experiment in Canada. J Public Econ 88:1495–1520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaure S, Røed K, Westlie L (2012) Job search incentives and job match quality. Labour Econ 19:438–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geerdsen LP (2006) Is there a threat effect of labour market programmes? A study of ALMP in the Danish UI system. Econ J 116:738–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geerdsen LP, Holm A (2007) Duration of UI periods and the perceived threat effect from labour market programmes. Labour Econ 14:639–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Graversen BK, Larsen B (2013) Is there a threat effect of mandatory activation programmes for the long-term unemployed? Empir Econ 44:1031–1051Google Scholar
  17. Ham JC, Rea J (1987) Unemployment insurance and male unemployment duration in Canada. J Labor Econ 5:325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heckman J, Singer B (1984) A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data. Econometrica 52:271–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jenkins SP (1995) Easy estimation methods for discrete-time duration models. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 57:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jenkins SP, García-Serrano C (2004) The relationship between unemployment benefits and re-employment probabilities: evidence from Spain. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 66:239–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Katz LF, Meyer BD (1990) The impact of the potential duration of unemployment benefits on the duration of unemployment. J Public Econ 41:45–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kroft K, Lange F, Notowidigdo MJ (2013) Duration dependence and labor market conditions: evidence from a field experiment. Q J Econ 128:1123–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kyyrä T, Parrotta P, Rosholm M (2013) The effect of receiving supplementary UI benefits on unemployment duration. Labour Econ 21:122–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lalive R, Zweimüller J (2004) Benefit entitlement and unemployment duration: the role of policy endogeneity. J Public Econ 88:2587–2616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meyer BD (1990) Unemployment Insurance and unemployment spells. Econometrica 58:757–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moffitt R (1985) Unemployment insurance and the distribution of unemployment spells. J Econom 28:85–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moffitt R, Nicholson W (1982) The effect of unemployment insurance on unemployment: the case of federal supplemental benefits. Rev Econ Stat 64:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mortensen DT (1977) Unemployment insurance and job search decisions. Ind Labor Relat Rev 30:505–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pellizzari M (2006) Unemployment duration and the interactions between unemployment insurance and social assistance. Labour Econ 13:773–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rebollo-Sanz Y (2012) Unemployment insurance and job turnover in Spain. Labour Econ 19:403–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rogers CL (1998) Expectations of unemployment insurance and unemployment duration. J Labor Econ 16:630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosholm M (2001) Cyclical variations in unemployment duration. J Popul Econ 14:173–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosholm M, Svarer M (2008) The threat effect of active labour market programmes. Scand J Econ 110:385–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tatsiramos K, Ours JC (2014) Labor market effects of unemployment insurance design. J Econ Surv 28:284–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tuomala J (2011) The threat effect of mandatory programmes in Finland. Labour 25:508–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van den Berg GJ (1990) Nonstationarity in job search theory. Rev Econ Stud 57:255–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van der Klaauw B, Van Ours JC (2013) Carrot and stick: how re-employment bonuses and benefit sanctions affect exit rates from welfare. J Appl Econom 28:275–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Ours JC, Vodopivec M (2006) How shortening the potential duration of unemployment benefits affects the duration of unemployment: evidence from a natural experiment. J Labor Econ 24:351–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Ours JC, Vodopivec M (2008) Does reducing unemployment insurance generosity reduce job match quality? J Public Econ 92:684–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weatherall CD (2008) Education at workplaces: long-term unemployment, wages and enrolment. Department of Economics. University of Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  41. Winkelmann L, Winkelmann R (1998) Why are the unemployed so unhappy? Evidence from panel data. Economica 65:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lars Pico Geerdsen
    • 1
  • Stéphanie Vincent Lyk-Jensen
    • 2
  • Cecilie Dohlmann Weatherall
    • 1
  1. 1.Kraks Fond Institute for Urban Economic ResearchCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.SFI - The Danish National Centre for Social ResearchCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations