Skip to main content
Log in

Transfer Functions for Predicting Borehole Gamma-Ray Logs

  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

If the gamma-ray emission rate of rocks varies only with depth, the intensity recorded in a vertical borehole is mathematically predictable. The Fourier transforms of these two functions of depth relate multiplicatively via transfer functions expressible as infinite series whose terms depend on Bessel functions. The results encode readily as programs with imperceptible run times that sample the transfers regularly for use with digitized data. Separate transfers treat non-directional and directional detectors, both supposed of negligible size and located on the borehole axis. Predicting the log from a synthetic test bed confirms and illustrates the theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramowitz, M., & Stegun, I. A. (Eds.). (1964). Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs and mathematical tables. Applied mathematics series (Vol. 55). Gaithersburg: National Bureau of Standards.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracewell, R. (1965). The Fourier transform and its applications. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristow, Q., Conaway, J. G., & Killeen, P. G. (1984). Application of inverse filtering to gamma-ray logs: A case study. Geophysics, 49, 1369–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. B., Duval, J. S., & Adams, J. A. S. (1972). Computer simulation of an air-borne gamma-ray spectrometer. Journal of Geophysical Research, 77, 3021–3031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conaway, J. G. (1980). Direct determination of the gamma-ray logging system response function in field boreholes. Geoexploration, 18, 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conaway, J. G. (1981). Deconvolution of gamma-ray logs in the case of dipping radioactive zones. Geophysics, 46, 198–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, M. (1993). The point-spread function for airborne radiometry. Mathematical Geology, 25, 1003–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, M. (2018). My homepage. http://members.optusnet.com.au/~towenaar/. Accessed 10 Nov 2018.

  • Dickson, B., & Craig, M. (2012). Deconvolving gamma-ray logs by adaptive zone refinement. Geophysics, 77(4), D159–D169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, P. J. (1978). Inversion of airborne radiometric data. Geophysics, 43, 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (2004). X-ray mass attenuation coefficients. https://www.nist.gov/pml/x-ray-mass-attenuation-coefficients. Accessed 10 Nov 2018.

  • Olver, F. W. J. & Maximon, L. C.(2018). Bessel functions. https://dlmf.nist.gov/10. Accessed 10 Nov 2018.

  • Watson, G. N. (1943). An infinite integral. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 38, 323–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G. N. (1980). A treatise on the theory of Bessel functions (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, E. T., & Watson, G. N. (1962). A course of modern analysis (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

 Dr. Bruce Dickson initiated the work reported here, as well as in Dickson and Craig (2012), by a 16 July, 2009 email asking whether the borehole case might have an analytic solution like the airborne one (Craig 1993). Both he and Mr. Geoff Taylor greatly assisted my endeavours to find answers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix: List of Variables

I omit symbols used only fleetingly, such as \(c, h, L, \theta , \varpi \), or as summation indices, like n.

\(a =\) :

Borehole radius, axis to casing

\(b =\) :

Casing thickness

\(e=\) :

\(\exp (1)\)

\(i=\) :

\(\sqrt{-1}\)

\(r =\) :

A radius, different in Propositions 1 and Lemma 5

st:

Sections 2 and 3 only, defined for Eq. 5

s :

Beyond Sect. 3, as introduced in Eq. 13

t(z):

Outside Sects. 2 and 3, defined in Eq. 1

\(u =\) :

Spatial frequency

\(w =\) :

Dummy variable of integration

\(z =\) :

Distance down hole from surface (except from mid-sill in Sect. 3)

A :

Defined for Eq. 5, maximum value A0

\(I(z) =\) :

Measured intensity

\(I_s\) :

Modified Bessel function

\({\mathcal {I}}_s\) :

Introduced in Eq. 13

\(J(u) =\) :

Transform of I(z)

K :

Defined for Eq. 5

\(N =\) :

Emission rate, factor of K

\({\mathbb {N}}\) :

Natural numbers \(1,2,3,\ldots \)

\({\mathcal {P}}, {\mathcal {Q}}, {\mathcal {R}}\) :

Defined by Eq. 7

\(R = s+t\) :

Sections 2 and 3 only (symbol reused in Lemma 5)

T(u):

Defined in Eq. 2

\(T^{(1)}(u), T^{(2)}(u)\) :

Transfers for spherical and linear detector

V :

Rock volume with differential \(\mathrm{d}V\)

\(\alpha =\) :

Parameter in Eqs. 1 and 2, outside Sect. 3 only

\(\alpha , \beta , \gamma =\) :

Coordinates of emitting element, in Sect. 3 only

\(\epsilon =\) :

Detector efficiency, factor of K

\(\kappa , \lambda \) :

Defined by Eq. 6

\(\mu , \nu , \sigma , \tau \) :

Defined for Eq. 5

\(\phi , \chi , \psi \) :

Defined by Eqs. 6 and 15

\(\varGamma\) :

Usual notation for the gamma function

\(\digamma \) :

Defined by Eq. 6 (digamma)

\(\varDelta \) :

Defined by Eq. 6

Errata

In Dickson and Craig (2012), for the denominator u in (A-3) read \(\pi {u}\). The borehole diameters on page D163 should be 10.16 and 11.43 cm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Craig, M. Transfer Functions for Predicting Borehole Gamma-Ray Logs. Pure Appl. Geophys. 176, 1649–1658 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-2052-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-2052-1

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation