Advertisement

Nexus Network Journal

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 125–152 | Cite as

The Geometry of Cuboctahedra in Medieval Art in Anatolia

  • Hakan Hisarligil
  • Beyhan Bolak Hisarligil
Research
  • 424 Downloads

Abstract

Numerous examples of cuboctahedra found in medieval-era buildings whose dates range from the early twelfth to the early fifteenth century across in Turkey indicate the significant use of such geometrical entities. Here we focus particularly on cuboctahedra with carved-out surfaces. The results show that although the unit cell, which is a combination of cubes and tetrahedra, sufficiently explains all examples, the octahemioctahedron and stella octangula strengthen the possibility of tetrahedral packing with its dual network and indicate a “vector matrix”, as suggested by R. Buckminster Fuller. Therefore, their prevalent use as a “geometric solid” in a hollow cube frame and their appearance as an envelope of either tetrahedral packing or highly complex surfaces reveal almost 800-hundred-year-old examples of cuboctahedra as a Vector Equilibrium (VE) producing Isotropic Vector Matrix (IVM).

Keywords

Geometry Architectural ornament Archimedean solids (cuboctahedron Rhombic dodecahedron) Polyhedron/polyhedral Medieval art Anatolia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Kim Williams and the reviewers for their thorough and constructive comments, which give us fresh ideas and more unexpected results in this challenging paper. All photographs and images are by the authors except Fig. 1a published with the reprint permission kindly granted by Suna and İnan Kıraç Foundation Anatolian Weights and Measures Collection.

References

  1. Akok, M. 1968. Kayseri’de Tuzhisarı Sultanhanı, Köşk Medrese ve Alaca Mescit diye tanınan Üç Selçuklu Mimari Eserin Rölövesi. Türk Arkeoloji Dergisi 17(2): 5–41.Google Scholar
  2. Aslanapa, O. 1971 (2004). Turkish Art and Architecture. Ankara: AKM Başkanlığı Yayınları.Google Scholar
  3. Asselah, K. 2009. Thâbit ibn Qurra: Construction d’un polyèdre semi-régulier à quatorze faces, 8 trianges équilatéraux et 6 carrés/Texte et traduction: Construction d’une figure solide à quatorze faces. In: Thabit ibn Qurra: Science and Philosophy in Ninth-Century Baghdad, eds. Roshdi Rashed, 317-323/324-331. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  4. Azarian, M. K. 2000. Meftah Al-Hesab: A Summary. Missouri Journal of Mathematical Sciences 12(2): 75–95.Google Scholar
  5. Bakırer, Ö. 1976. Onüç ve Ondördüncü Yüzyıllarda Anadolu Mihrapları. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları.Google Scholar
  6. Bijli, S. M. 2004. Early Muslims and Their Contribution to Science: Ninth to Fourteenth Century. Delhi: Idarah-i Adabiyat-i Delli.Google Scholar
  7. Bonner, J. 2000. Islamic Geometric Patterns: Their Historical Development and Traditional Methods of Derivation. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Chorbachi, W. K. 1989. In the Tower of Babel: Beyond Symmetry in Islamic Design. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 17 (4-6): 751–789.Google Scholar
  9. Coxeter, H.S.M. 1973. Regular Polytopes. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Cromwell, P.R. 1997. Polyhedra. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cromwell, P.R. 2009. The Search for Quasi-Periodicity in Islamic 5-fold Ornament. The Mathematical Intelligencer 31(1): 26–56.Google Scholar
  12. Diez, E. 1947. “Endosmos’lar”. Felsefe Arkivi 2(2): 220–238.Google Scholar
  13. Edmondson, A.C. 1987. A Fuller Explanation: The Synergetic Geometry of R. Buckminster Fuller. Boston, Basel, Stuttgart: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  14. Freely, J. 2012. Flame of Miletus: The Birth of Science in Ancient Greece (and How It Changed the World). London, New York: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  15. Friberg, J. 2007. A Remarkable Collection of Babylonian Mathematical Texts. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Fuller, R. B., E. J. Applewhite, and A.L. Loeb. 1975. Synergetics: Explorations in the Geometry of Thinking. New York: Macmillan Co.Google Scholar
  17. Hann, M. 2013. Structure and Form in Design: Critical Ideas for Creative Practice. London, New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  18. Hisarlıgil, H. and B. Bolak-Hisarlıgil. 2009. Back to the Future: Cuboctahedron Revisited. Design Principles and Practices 3(4): 109–124.Google Scholar
  19. Hogendijk, J. P. 2008. The Introduction to Geometry by Qustā ibn Lūqā: Translation and Commentary. Suhayl 8: 163–221.Google Scholar
  20. Hogendijk, J.P. 2012. Mathematics and geometric ornamentation in the medieval Islamic world. The European Mathematical Society Newsletter 86: 37–43.Google Scholar
  21. Holden, A. 1971. Shapes, Space, and Symmetry. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kappraff, J. 2001. Connections: The Geometric Bridge between Art and Science. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  23. Lindberg, D. C. 2008. The Beginning of Western Science: The European Scientific Tradition in Philosophical, Religious, and Institutional Context, Prehistory to AD 1450. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Loeb, A. 1970. A systematic survey of cubic crystal structures. Journal of Solid State Chemistry 1(2): 237–267.Google Scholar
  25. Lu, P. J. and P. J. Steinhardt. 2007. Decagonal and Quasi-crystalline Tilings in Medieval Islamic Architecture. Science 315: 1106–1110.Google Scholar
  26. Makovicky, E. 1992. 800-year-old Pentagonal Tiling from Maragha, Iran, and the New Varieties of Aperiodic Tiling It Inspired. In: Fivefold Symmetry, eds. Istvan Hargittai, 67–86. London: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  27. Ödekan, Ayla. 1987. Mimarlık ve Sanat Tarihi. In: Türkiye Tarihi 1- Osmanlı Devletine Kadar Türkler, eds. Sina Akşin, 363–499. İstanbul: Cem Yayınları.Google Scholar
  28. Ögel, S. 1966. Anadolu Selçukluları’nın Taş Tezyinatı. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.Google Scholar
  29. Öney, G. 1971, Anadolu Selçuk Mimarisinde Arslan Figürü. Anadolu (Anatolia) XIII: 1-64.Google Scholar
  30. Önge, M. 2004. Restoration of Zazadin Han: A 13th century Seljukid Caravanserai near Konya. Unpublished Master Thesis in Architecture. Middle East Technical University, Ankara.Google Scholar
  31. Önkal, H. 1996 (2015). Anadolu Selçuklu Türbeleri. Ankara: Atatürk Kültür Merkezi Yayınları.Google Scholar
  32. Özdural, A. 1995. Omar Khayyam, Mathematicians and Conversazioni with Artisans. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 54 (1): 54–71.Google Scholar
  33. Özdural, A. 1996. On Interlocking Similar or Corresponding Figures and Ornamental Patterns of Cubic Equations. Muqarnas 13: 191–211.Google Scholar
  34. Özdural, A. 1998. A Mathematical Sonata for Architecture: Omar Khayyam and the Friday Mosque of Isfahan. Technology and Culture 39 (4): 699–715.Google Scholar
  35. Özdural, A. 2000. Mathematics and Arts: Connections between Theory and Practice in the Medieval Islamic World. Historia Mathematica 27 (2): 171–201.Google Scholar
  36. Özdural, Alpay. 2015. The Use of Cubic Equations in Islamic Art and Architecture. In: Architecture and Mathematics from Antiquity to the Future. K. Williams and M. Ostwald (eds), vol. I, pp. 467–481. Cham: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  37. Özer, M. 2004. Sitti Şah Sultan’ın Edirne’deki Eserleri ve Mezarına Ait Taşlar. Abant İzzet Baysal Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 1 (8): 175–214.Google Scholar
  38. Özgan, S.Y. and M. Özkar. 2017. A Thirteenth-Century Dodecahedron in Central Anatolia: Geometric Patterns and Polyhedral Geometry. Nexus Network Journal 19(2): 455–471.Google Scholar
  39. Rashed, R. 2009. Thabit ibn Qurra: Science and Philosophy in Ninth-Century Baghdad. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  40. Rosenfeld, B. and A.P. Youschkevitch. 1996. Geometry. In: Encyclopedia of the History of Arabic Science vol 2, eds. Roshdi Rashed, 115–159. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Sarhangi, R. 2008. Illustrating Abu al-Wafā’ Būzjānī: Flat Images, Spherical Constructions. Iranian Studies 41(4) 511–523.Google Scholar
  42. Sözen, M. and U. Tanyeli. 1986. Sanat Kavram ve Terimleri Sözlüğü. Istanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.Google Scholar
  43. Ta’ani, O.H. 2011. An Analysis of the Contents and Pedagogy of Al-Kashi’s 1427 Key to Arithmetic (Meftah Al-Hisab). Ph.D. Dissertation. New Mexico: New Mexico State University.Google Scholar
  44. Weisstein, E.W. 2002. CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
  45. Yıldırım, M. and Z. Üzüm. 2010. Konya Sadreddin Konevi Camii Çini Mihrabı. İstem 15: 221–236.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kim Williams Books, Turin 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Atilim University Department of Architecture Kizilcasar Mah. IncekAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations