Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics

, Volume 150, Issue 1, pp 1–21 | Cite as

Environmental tax reforms in Switzerland a computable general Equilibrium impact analysis

  • Christoph Böhringer
  • André Müller
Open Access


The Swiss energy strategy until 2050 envisages ambitious CO2 emission reduction targets along with substantial cutbacks in electricity consumption to establish a low-carbon economy without nuclear energy. Our computable general equilibrium analysis finds that compliance with stringent CO2 constraints requires high CO2 taxes on economic activities which are not eligible for international emissions trading; likewise, electricity consumers are burdened with substantial electricity taxes. Environmental tax reforms are not likely to generate welfare gains without accounting for the benefits of improved environmental quality. However, economic adjustment costs to a low carbon economy without nuclear energy remain modest and can be markedly reduced through revenue-neutral cuts of initial distortionary taxes. On the other hand, alternative recycling strategies pose a trade-off between efficiency and distributional justice which has to be resolved on normative grounds.


H21 D58 Q48 


environmental tax reforms computable general equilibrium 


  1. Armington, Paul S. (1969), “A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production”, Staff Paper, International Monetary Fund, 16(1), pp. 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Böhringer, Christoph (1998), “The synthesis of Bottom-Up and Top-Down in Energy Policy Modeling”, Energy Economics, 20, pp. 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Böhringer, Christoph, and Thomas F. Rutherford (2008), “Combining Bottom-Up and Top-Down”, Energy Economics, 30, pp. 574–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dimaranan, Betina V., and Robert A. McDougall (2002), “Global Trade, Assistance, and Production”, The GTAP 5 Data Base, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.Google Scholar
  5. Ecoplan (2012a), „Volkswirtschaftliche Auswirkungen der Energiestrategie 2050“, Study commissioned by the Swiss Federal Office of Energy, Berne.Google Scholar
  6. Ecoplan (2012b), „Volkswirtschaftliche Auswirkungen einer ökologischen Steuerreform“, Study commissioned by the Swiss Federal Office of Energy, Swiss Federal Finance Administration, Swiss Federal Tax Administration, Berne.Google Scholar
  7. EU — European Union (2003), “Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 Establishing a scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading within the Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (Text with EEA relevance)”, Brussels.Google Scholar
  8. EU — European Union (2004), “Directive 2004/101/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 27 October 2004 Amending Directive 2003/87/ EC Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading within the Community, in Respect of the Kyoto Protocol’s Project Mechanisms (Text with EEA relevance)”. Brussels.Google Scholar
  9. Evers, Michiel, Ruud De Mooij, and Daniel Van Vuuren (2008), “The Wage Elasticity of Labour Supply: A Synthesis of Empirical Estimates”, De Economist, 156(1), pp. 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. FFA — Swiss Federal Finance Administration (2010), “Switzerland’s Financial Statistics for 2008”, Annual report, Berne.Google Scholar
  11. FSIO — Swiss Federal Social Insurance Office (2011), “Swiss Social Insurance Statistics 2011” (in German and French), Berne.Google Scholar
  12. FSO — Swiss Federal Statistical Office (2011), “Household Budget Surveys for the Years 2007 to 2009”, Neuchâtel.Google Scholar
  13. Gerfin, Michael (1993), “A Simultaneous Discrete Choice Model of Labor Supply and Wages for Married Women in Switzerland”, Empirical Economics, 18, pp. 337–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goulder, Lawrence H. (1995) “Environmental Taxation and the Double Dividend: A Reader’s Guide”, International Tax and Public Finance, 2(2), pp. 157–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mansur, Ahsan, and John Whalley (1984), “Numerical Specification of Applied General Equilibrium Models: Estimation, Calibration, and Data”, in Applied General Equilibrium Analysis, H.E. Scarf and J. B. Shoven, eds., pp. 69–127, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mohler, Lukas, and Daniel Müller (2012), “Substitution Elasticities in Swiss Manufacturing”, Study commissioned by the Swiss Federal Office of Energy.Google Scholar
  17. Nathani, Carsten, Christian Schmid, and Renger Van Nieuwkoop (2011), „Schätzung einer Input-Output-Tabelle der Schweiz 2008“, study commissioned by the Swiss Federal Statistical Office, Rüschlikon, Berne.Google Scholar
  18. Oecd – Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007), “OECD/EEA Database on Instruments Used for Environmental Policy and Natural Resources Management”, Technical Report, Paris. Available online at:
  19. Pearce, David W. (1991), “The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming”, Economic Journal, 101.Google Scholar
  20. Prognos (2012), „Die Energieperspektiven für die Schweiz bis 2050 — Energienachfrage und Elektrizitätsangebot in der Schweiz 2000–2050“, Study commissioned by the Swiss Federal Office of Energy, Basel.Google Scholar
  21. Repetto, Robert, Roger C. Dower, Robin Jenkins, and Jacqueline Geoghegan (1992), “Green Fees: How a Tax Shift Can Work for the Environment and the Economy”, World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  22. Rutherford, Thomas F. (2002), “Lecture Notes on Constant Elasticity”. Available online at:
  23. Saito, Mika (2004), “Armington Elasticities in Intermediate Inputs Trade: A Problem in Using Multilateral Trade Data”, IMF Working Paper.Google Scholar
  24. Welsch, Heinz (2008), “Armington Elasticities for Energy Policy Modeling: Evidence from Four European Countries”, Energy Economics, 30, pp. 2252–2264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

©  Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ECOPLANSwitzerland
  2. 2.University of OldenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations