Skip to main content
Log in

Human activity: The soft underbelly of mathematics?

  • Published:
The Mathematical Intelligencer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

Human activity and experience are an integral part of mathematics. They not only play a crucial role in the creative process of research but are also basic to the way human beings learn. I have suggested three lines of attack which would give students a better understanding of what mathematics is really about. First, we have to show them how (at least some of) the material they are studying originated and evolved into its present form through the combined efforts of generations of mathematicians. Second, we must encourage them to take an active part in their own learning, not just by practising routine exercises but by developing their own creative talents—thereby sharpening their insight into the way mathematics is created. Third, we have to find some way of relating higher mathematics to students’ previous experience. “The more abstract the truth is that you would teach, the more you have to seduce the senses to it” (F. Nietzsche,Beyond Good and Evil).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. J. Budden (1978)The Fascination of Groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. P. Burn (1982)A Pathway into Number Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. J. D. Dixon (1973)Problems in Group Theory. New York: Dover

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. M. Edwards (1977)Fermat’s Last Theorem: A Genetic Approach to Algebraic Number Theory. New York: Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. T. J. Fletcher (1972)Linear Algebra Through Its Applications. London: Van Nostrand Reinhold

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Gaal (1973)Classical Galois Theory. New York: Chelsea

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Gardiner (1982)Infinite Processes: Background to Analysis. New York: Springer

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Gardiner (1977) The Art of Doing Mathematics (manuscript)

  9. M. W. Han (1977) The Lecture Method in Mathematics: A Student’s View.Am. Math. Month.80:195–201

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Kline (1972)Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times. New York: Oxford University Press

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. I. Lakatos (1976)Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Lebesgue (1966)Measure and Integral. San Francisco: Holden-Day

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. L. Lovasz (1979)Combinatorial Problems and Exercises. Amsterdam: North-Holland

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. E. E. Moise (1982)Introductory Problem Courses in Analysis and Topology. New York: Springer

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. D. J. Newman (1982)A Problem Seminar. New York: Springer

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Polya and G. Szego (1972)Problems and Theorems in Analysis, Vol. 1. Berlin: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Reid(1970)Hilbert. New York: Springer

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Roberts (1977)Elementary Number Theory: A Problem Oriented Approach. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Thorn (1973) Modern mathematics: Does it exist? inDevelopments in Mathematical Education, A. G. Howson, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gardiner, A.D. Human activity: The soft underbelly of mathematics?. The Mathematical Intelligencer 6, 22–27 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024124

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024124

Keywords

Navigation