Skip to main content
Log in

Why legendre made a wrong guess about π-(x), and how laguerre’s continued fraction for the logarithmic integral improved it

  • Published:
The Mathematical Intelligencer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carl Friedrich Gauβ, in 1792, when he was 15, found by numerical evidence that π(x), the number of primes p such that p ≤ x, goes roughly with x/in x (letter to Encke, 1849). This was, as can be seen from Table 1, a very weak approximation with an error of about 10%. In 1798 and again in 1808,

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Pafnuty Lvovich Chebyshev, Sur la fonction qui détermine la totalité des nombres premiers,Oeuvres l, 27–48 (1851).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pafnuty Lvovich Chebyshev, Mémoire sur les nombres premiers,Oeuvres I, 49–70 (1854).

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles-Jean de la Vallee-Poussin,Ann. Soc. Sci. Bruxelles 20, 183–256, 281–397 (1896).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul Erdős, On a new method in elementary number theory which leads to an elementary proof of the prime number theorem,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 35, 374–384 (1949).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaques Hadamard,Oeuvres I, 189–210 (1896).

    Google Scholar 

  • Helge von Koch,Math. Annalen 55 (1902), 441–464.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Edmond Nicolas Laguerre, Sur la réduction en fractions continues d’une fonction que satisfait à une équation différentielle linéaire du premier ordre dont les coefficients sont rationelles,J. Math. Pures et Appl. (4)1 (1885).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmund Landau,Vorlesungen über Zahlentheorie, S. Hirzel, Leipzig 1927.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Adrien-Marie Legendre,Théorie des nombres. 2nd edition, 1798, No. 394–401.

  • Bernhard Riemann, Ueber die Anzahl der Primzahlen unter einer gegebenen GröBe,Werke, 136–144.

  • J. Barkley Rosser and Lowell Schoenfeld, Approximate formulas for some functions of prime numbers,Illinois J. Math. 6 (1962), 64–94.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lowell Schoenfeld, Sharper bounds for the Chebyshev functions θ(x) and ψ(x). II.Math. Comp. 30 (1976), 337–360.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Atle Selberg, An elementary proof of the prime number theorem for arithmetic progressions,Ann. Math. (2)50, 305–313 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • James Joseph Sylvester, On arithmetical series,Collected Works III, 573–587 (1892).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bauer, F.L. Why legendre made a wrong guess about π-(x), and how laguerre’s continued fraction for the logarithmic integral improved it. The Mathematical Intelligencer 25, 7–11 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02984842

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02984842

Keywords

Navigation