Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing the quality of distance education programs: The faculty’s perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

IN THE SPRING OF 2000, the National Education Association and Blackboard Inc. commissioned The Institute of Higher Education Policy, to identify the benchmarks considered essential to ensuring excellence in Internet-based distance learning. The Institute’s study revealed that there were 24 benchmarks considered essential to ensuring excellence in Internet-based distance learning. The purpose of this study is to ascertain the extent to which the benchmarks in the Course Development, Teaching/Learning Process, Course Structure and Faculty Support categories of the Institute’s study are being incorporated in the policies, procedures, and practices of a random sample of institutions of higher education offering Internet-based distance education courses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cleary, S. (2001, March 12). The downside: Why some critics give Web-based education less-than-stellar grades.Wall Street Journal. p. R32.

  • Fong, S. (1999). Application of WebCT for assisting Hong Kong part-time students to learn accounting.Proceedings of the First Annual WebCT Conference on Learning Technologies. June 17–18, 1999. Vancouver, Canada.

  • Goldberg, M (1997). CALOS: First results from an experiment in computer-aided learning.Proceedings of the ACM’s 28th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. [Online] Available: www.webct.com/papers/exper.html

  • Grimes, A. (2001, March 12). The hope and the reality: Big money is pouring into the business of education. But it’s too soon to tell whether there will be any payoff.Wall Street Journal. p. R6.

  • Hagen, A., & Raggad, B. (1998). The impact of technology-mediated distance learning on American business colleges in the near future: An empirical investigation.Society for Advancement of Management Proceedings. Corpus Christi, TX.

  • Hara, N., & Kling, R. (1999).Students’ frustration with a Web-based distance education course: A Taboo Topic in the Discourse. CSI Working Paper. Online] Available: http://www.slis.indiana.edu/CSI/wp99_01.htm

  • Hiltz, S. (1994).The virtual classroom: Learning without limits via computer networks. Norwood, NJ: Alblex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, L., Snow, K., & Farris, E. (1999). Distance education at postsecondary education institutions: 1997–98.National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), U.S. Department of Education, NCES#2000-013. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merron (1998). Managing a Web-based literature course for undergraduates.Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 1(4). [Online] Available http://www.westga.edu/~distance/merron14.html

  • Moursund, D. (1997). The future on information technology in education.Learning and Leading with Technology, 25(1), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauley, R., Cunningham, M., & Childress, R. (1999). A quantitative analysis of graduate students’ perceptions of WebCT.Proceedings of the First Annual WebCT Conference on Learning Technologies. June 17–18. Vancouver, Canada.

  • Phipps, R.A., & Merisotis, J.P. (1999).What’s the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers and National Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, R.A., & Merisotis, J.P. (2000).Quality on the line: Benchmarks for success in Internet-based distance education. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Totty, M., & Grimes, A. (2001). The old college Try: Traditional universities are taking to the net with a wide range of strategies.Wall Street Journal, p. R10.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John F. Bennett.

Additional information

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

John Bennett is an Associate Professor of marketing and an instructional technologist specialist at Stephens College. He helped developed the online MBA at Stephens and is currently assisting faculty in developing online courses for the continuing education program at Stephens. Mr. Bennett teaches both undergraduate and graduate Web-based and Web-enhanced courses in marketing. His research interests include Internet learning environments, distance learning, and technology integration in teaching and learning.

Linda Baird Bennett is an Assistant Professor in social studies education at the University of Missouri-Columbia. She is on the Board of Directors for Technology in the College of Education and a member of the Faculty Advisory Board for Instructional Technology for the University of Missouri-Columbia. She also serves on the editorial board for Theory and Research in Social Education and Social Studies and the Young Learner. Dr. Baird Bennett had developed extensive home pages for elementary social studies education and an online master’s degree with a focus in social studies education. She teaches both graduate and undergraduate elementary social studies courses. Her research interests include the integration of technology into teacher education.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bennett, J.F., Bennett, L.B. Assessing the quality of distance education programs: The faculty’s perspective. J. Comput. High. Educ. 13, 71–86 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940966

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940966

Keywords

Navigation