Advertisement

Economic Botany

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 344–349 | Cite as

Cucurbits and cultures in the Americas

  • Thomas W. Whitaker
  • Hugh C. Cutler
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    The bottle gourd,Lagenaria siceraria, and the five cultivated species ofCucurbita are the cucurbits commonly found in archeological sites.

     
  2. 2.

    The archeological history of the bottle gourd indicates that it was one of the first plants to be domesticated in the Americas. In many sites, it is found in pre-ceramic, pie-maize strata. In the Old World,La-genaria was never so widely distributed nor used as in the Americas, probably because of the early invention of pottery in Asia.

     
  3. 3.

    The center of distribution of the genusCucurbita is apparently in the region directly south of Mexico City. In this general area, there are several wild species that are compatible with the cultivated species.

     
  4. 4.

    The cultivated species ofCucurbita, in general, are characterized by an allopatric distribution. The archeological record suggests that each species was domestitcated at different times and almost certainly in different areas.

     
  5. 5.

    The cultural history of the cucurbits indicates a very strong tendency towards conservative crop husbandry among pre Columbian and post-Columbian peoples in that they tended to grow essentially the same cultivars over long periods of time.

     

Keywords

Archeological Site Wild Species Economic Botany Peru Mexico City 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Carter, G. F. 1945. Some archeologic cucurbit seed from Peru. Acta Americana3: 163–172.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cogniaux, A., and H. Harms. 1924 Das Pflanzenreich: IV (A. Engler) Cucurbite —Cucumerinae275 (11): 200–209.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cutler, H. C. and Thomas W. Whitaker. 1961. History and distribution of the cultivated cucurbits in the Americas. Amer. Antiquity26: 469–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    -, and -. 1965. Cucurbits from the Tehuacán Caves. In press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meeuse, A. D. J. 1962. The Cucurbitaceae of South Africa. Bothalia7: 1–111.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sauer, C. O. 1950. Cultivated plants of South and Central America. Bull. 143, Handbook of South American Indians6: 487–543. Smithsonian Inst, Bur. Amer. Ethnology.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    St. Pierre, Germainde. 1866. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr.13: 301–304.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vestal, P. A. 1938.Cucurbita moschata found in pre-Columbian mounds in Guatemala. Harvard Univ. Bot. Leaflets6: 65–69.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Whitaker, Thomas W. and J. B. Bird. 1949. Identification and significance of the cucurbit materials from Huaca Prieta, Peru. Amer. Museum Nov. No. 1426, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    —, H. C. Cutler and R. S. MacNeish. 1957. Cucurbit materials from three caves near Ocampo, Tamaulipas. Amer. Antiquity22: 352–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1965

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas W. Whitaker
  • Hugh C. Cutler
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.United States Department of AgricultureLa Jolla
  2. 2.Curator of Useful PlantsMissouri Botanical GardenSt. Louis

Personalised recommendations