Skip to main content
Log in

A study of the cyanogenetic content and toxicity of the fruit of selected species ofCotoneaster

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cyanogenetic glycosides were found to be present in the leaf, bark and fruit of eight species of Cotoneaster. A quantitative determination of cyanogenetic material was made on the leaf, bark and fruit of C. divaricate at three different periods in the growing season. The leaf was found to have the greatest percentage of cyanogenetic glycosides and the fruit the least. Seasonal variation was found to be greatest in the fruit where it was demonstrated that the cyanogenetic content decreased as the fruit aged. Toxicity of the fruit of C. divaricata was studied in the dog, cat and rat. On the basis of the cyanogenetic glycoside determinations and the toxicity studies it was concluded that classification of these eight species of Cotoneaster as poisonous was not warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Bumside, J. E. 1954. Procedure for qualitative determination of hydrocyanic acid by the sodium picrate test. Georgia Vet. 6(3): 10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Datta, S. K. 1955. Chemical investigation of IndianCotoneaster frígida. I. Chemical composition of fruit pulps. Jour. Indian Chem. Soc. 32: 344.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gettler, A. O. and J. O. Baine. 1938. The toxicology of cyanide. Amer. Jour. Med. Sci. 195: 182.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Guignard, M. L. 1907. New examples of Rosaceae which produce hydrocyanic acid. Compt. rend. Acad. Sci. 143: 451.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Herissey, H. 1907. The occurrence of prulaurasin inCotoneaster microphylla Wall. Arch. Pharm. 245: 473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. —. 1907. The existence of prulaurasin inCotoneaster microphylla. Jour. Pharm. Chem. 24: 537.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kingsbury, J. M. 1964. Poisonous plants of the United States and Canada. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Miller, L. C. and M. L. Tainter. 1944. Estimation of the ED50 and its error by means of logarithmic-probit graph paper. Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med. 57: 261.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Muenscher, W. G. 1951. Poisonous plants of the United States. 2nd ed. Macmillan, New York, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Plouvier, V. 1936. The presence of amygdonitrile glucoside in the genus Cotoneaster and the leaves ofCydonia vulgaris. Pers. Compt. rend. Soc. Biol. (Paris) 202: 352.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. —. 1942. Biochemical study of some Rosaceae. Ann. sci. nat. Botan. 3: 204.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenthaler, L. 1926. The hydrocyanic acid question. XVIII. New plants containing HCN. Pharm. Acta Helv. 1: 167.

    Google Scholar 

  13. —. 1929. The hydrocyanic acid question. XXVI. New occurrences of hydrocyanic acid. Pharm. Acta. Helv. 4: 196.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Watt, J. M. and M. G. Breyer-Brandwijk. 1962. Medicinal and poisonous plants of southern and eastern Africa. E. and S. Livingstone Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This investigation was supported by National Science Foundation Undergraduate Research Participation Program Grant No.GE-6543.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tidwell, R.H., Beal, J.L., Patel, D.G. et al. A study of the cyanogenetic content and toxicity of the fruit of selected species ofCotoneaster . Econ Bot 24, 47–50 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860634

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860634

Keywords

Navigation