Advertisement

Economic Botany

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 389–406 | Cite as

Development policy, forests, and peasant farms: Reflections on Huastec-managed forests’ contributions to commercial production and resource conservation

  • Janis B. Alcorn
Article

Abstract

The Huastec Indians of northeastern Mexico manage their forests in an indigenous system that integrates commercial and subsistence production. Elements of primary and secondary forest coexist with introduced species in this diverse silvicultural structure which complements the swidden and permanent agriculture fields of the Huastec farmstead. The forest’s direct production of the food, timber, and fuel resources discussed here buffers the Huastec peasant family against market fluctuations and the failed harvest of a single crop. The Huastec system of forest management offers an alternative pattern to the agroforestry and plantation schemes now being suggested for development in the tropics. It is an alternative that provides protection for wild genetic resources while it contributes to the combination of commercial and subsistence agriculture so important for the successful modernization of peasant agriculture. The documentation of this system demonstrates that ethnobotanists and economic botanists have an important but unrealized role to play in the protection of biotic resources and in the development of sustained yield agroecosystems for peasants. The contributions of ethnobotanists are particularly valuable because they can find where and why useful wild species persist in agroecosystems. A greater effort to direct the attentions of policy makers to the value of ethnobotanical knowledge is needed.

Keywords

Tropical Forest Economic Botany Green Revolution Tropical Moist Forest Silvicultural System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Adeyoju, S. K. 1976. Land use and tenure in the tropics. Unasylva 28 (112–113): 26–41.Google Scholar
  2. Alcorn, J. B. 1981a. Huastec noncrop resource management. Human Ecology 9: 395–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. —. 1981b. Some factors influencing botanical resource perception among the Huastec: Suggestions for future ethnobotanical inquiry. J. Ethnobiol. 1: 221–230.Google Scholar
  4. —. 1983. El te’lom Huasteco: Presente, pasado y future de un sistema de silviculture indígena. Biótica 8: 315–331.Google Scholar
  5. —. 1984. Huastec Mayan Ethnobotany. Univ. Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  6. —, and C. Hernández V. 1983. Plants of the Huastecan region of Mexico with an analysis of their Huastec names. J. Mayan Ling. 4: 11–118.Google Scholar
  7. Anonymous. 1978. Drug policies and management: medicinal plants. WHO Document WHA31.33. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  8. Aspelin, P. L. 1975. External Articulation and Domestic Production: The Artifact Trade of the Mamainde of Northwestern Mato Grosso, Brazil. Unpubl. PhD. diss. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  9. Baer, R. 1983. Response to Fleuret and Fleuret (1983). Cult. & Agric. 21: 19.Google Scholar
  10. Baker, D., E. Modiakgotla, D. Norman, J. Siebert, and M. Tjirongo. 1983. Helping the limited resource farmer through the farming systems approach to research. Cult. & Agric. 19: 1–8.Google Scholar
  11. Barlett, P. F. 1980. Adaptive strategies in peasant agricultural production. Ann. Rev. Anthropol. 9: 545–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barrera, A. 1979. La etnobotánica.In Barrera, A., ed, La Etnobotanica. INIREB, Xalapa.Google Scholar
  13. Bowonder, B. 1983. Forest depletion: Some policy options. Resources Policy 1983: 206–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brewer, G. D. 1981. The State’s responsibilities for the protection and preservation of forestry resources.In Mergen, F., ed, Tropical Forests: Utilization and Conservation. Yale School of Forestry, New Haven.Google Scholar
  15. Budowski, G. 1981. The place of agro-forestry in managing tropical forests.In Mergen, F., ed, Tropical Forests: Utilization and Conservation. Yale School of Forestry, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  16. Caballero N., J. 1979. Perspectivas para el quehacer etnobotánica en México.In Barrera, A., ed, La Etnobotánica. INIREB, Xalapa.Google Scholar
  17. Chacón, J. C, and S. R. Gliessman. 1982. Use of the non-weed concept in traditional tropical agroecosystems of south-eastern Mexico. Agro-Ecosystems 8: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clarke, W. C. 1976. Maintenance of agriculture and human habitats within the tropical forest ecosystem. Human Ecology 4: 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Conklin, H. C. 1980. Ethnographic Atlas of Ifugao. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  20. Cox, G. W., and M. D. Atkins. 1979. Agricultural Ecology: An Analysis of World Food Production Systems. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  21. Dahlberg, K. A. 1979. Beyond the Green Revolution. Plenum, New York,Google Scholar
  22. de las Salas, G., ed. 1979. Proceedings, Workshop: Agroforestry systems in Latin America. CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
  23. Denevan, W. M. 1981. Swiddens and cattle versus forest: The imminent demise of the Amazon rain forest reexamined. Stud. Third World Societies 13: 25–44.Google Scholar
  24. —, J. M. Treacy, J. B. Alcorn, C. Padoch, J. Denslow, and S. Flores Paitan. 1984. Indigenous agroforestry in the Peruvian Amazon: Bora Indian management of swidden fallows.In Hemming, J., ed, Change in the Amazon Basin: Man’s Impact on Forests and Rivers. Univ. Manchester Press, Manchester, England.Google Scholar
  25. Dewalt, B. 1982. The big macro connection: Population, grain, cattle in S. Honduras. Cult. & Agric. 14: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dewey, K. G. 1981. Nutritional consequences of the transformation from subsistence to commercial agriculture in Tabasco, Mexico. Human Ecology 9: 151–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ewel, J. 1980. Tropical succession: Manifold routes to maturity. Biotropica 12 (Supplement, Tropical Succession): 2–7.Google Scholar
  28. Fleuret, P., and A. Fleuret. 1980. Nutrition, consumption, and agricultural change. Human Organization 39: 250–260.Google Scholar
  29. Fleuret, P., and A. Fleuret. 1983. Socioeconomic determinants of child nutrition in Taita, Kenya: A call for discussion. Cult. & Agric. 19: 8, 16–22.Google Scholar
  30. Flores Rodas, M. A. 1981. Forestry for rural development—new approach.In Mergen, F., ed, Tropical Forests: Utilization and Conservation. Yale School of Forestry, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  31. Floyd, B. 1969. Eastern Nigeria. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Frankel, F. 1971. India’s Green Revolution: Economic Gains and Political Costs. Princeton Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  33. George, S. 1977. How the Other Half Dies: The Real Reasons for World Hunger. Allanheld, Osmun, Montclair, NJ.Google Scholar
  34. Glass, E. H., and H. D. Thurston. 1978. Traditional and modern crop protection in perspective. BioScience 28: 109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gliessman, S. R., R. García E., and M. Amador A. 1981. The ecological basis for the application of traditional agricultural technology in the management of tropical agro-ecosystems. Agro-Ecosystems 7: 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gomez-Pompa, A. 1982. La Etnobotánica en México. Biótica 7: 151–161.Google Scholar
  37. —, and F. Golley. 1980. Sintesis, conclusiones y recomendaciones: Seminario de Trabajo sobre Estrategias del Uso del Suelo y sus Recursos por las Culturas Mesoamericanas y su Aplicación para Satisfacer las Demandas Actuales. Biótica 5: 43–51.Google Scholar
  38. Gordon, B. L. 1982. A Panama Forest and Shore. Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, CA.Google Scholar
  39. Grandstaff, T. 1978. The development of swidden agriculture (shifting cultivation). Developm. & Change 9: 547–579.Google Scholar
  40. Greenland, D. J. 1975. Bringing the Green Revolution to the shifting cultivator. Science 190: 841–844.Google Scholar
  41. Gregersen, H. M. 1981. Environmental constraints versus economic gains in tropical forestry.In Mergen, F., ed, Tropical Forests: Utilization and Conservation. Yale School of Forestry, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  42. Grossman, L. 1981. The cultural ecology of economic development. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geogr. 71: 220–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gudeman, S. 1978. The Demise of a Rural Economy: From Subsistence to Capitalism in a Latin American Village. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, England. or]Guess, G. M. 1979. Pasture expansion, forestry, and development contradictions: The case of Costa Rica. Stud. Comp. Int. Developm. Spring 1979: 42–55.Google Scholar
  44. Harriss, J. 1982. Capitalism and Peasant Farming. Oxford Univ. Press, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  45. Hart, R. D. 1980. A natural ecosystem analog approach to the design of a successional crop system for tropical forest environments. Biotropica 12 (Supplement, Tropical Succession): 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Huguet, L. 1978. Symbiosis of agriculture and forestry. Unasylva 30: 25–29.Google Scholar
  47. Humphrey, C. R., and F. R. Buttel. 1982. Environment, Energy, and Society. Wadsworth, Belmont, MA.Google Scholar
  48. Hunt, D. 1979. Chayanov’s model of peasant household resource allocation. J. Peasant Stud. 6: 247–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. IUCN-UNEP-WWF. 1980. World Conservation Strategy: Living Resources Conservation for Sustainable Development. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  50. Janzen, D. H. 1973. Tropical agroecosystems. Science 182: 1212–1219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kundstadter, P. 1978. Ecological modification and adaptation: An ethnobotanical view of Lua’ swiddeners in northwest Thailand.In Ford, R. I., ed, The Nature and Status of Ethnobotany, Anthropol. Pap. No. 67, Museum Anthropology, Univ. Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  52. Lappe, F. M., and J. Collins. 1978. Food First. Ballantine, New York.Google Scholar
  53. Leslie, A. 1977. Where contradictory theory and practice co-exist. Unasylva 29 115: 2–17.Google Scholar
  54. Long, A., and N. Johnson. 1981. Forest plantations in Kalimantan, Indonesia.In Mergen, F., ed, Tropical Forests: Utilization and Conservation. Yale School of Forestry, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  55. Mergen, F., ed. 1981. Tropical Forests: Utilization and Conservation. Yale School of Forestry, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  56. Myers, N. 1980. Conversion of Tropical Moist Forests. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  57. Nations, J. D., and D. I. Komer. 1982. Indians, immigrants and beef exports: Deforestation in Central America. Cult. Survival Quart. 6: 8–12.Google Scholar
  58. —, and R. B. Nigh. 1980. The evolutionary potential of Lacandon Maya sustained-yield tropical forest agriculture. J. Anthropol. Res. 36: 1–30.Google Scholar
  59. Nwoboshi, L. C. 1981. Soil productivity aspects of agri-silviculture in the West African rain forest zone. Agro-Ecosystems 7: 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Oldfield, M. L. 1981. Tropical deforestation and genetic resources conservation. Stud. Third World Societies 14: 277–345.Google Scholar
  61. —. 1984. The Value of Conserving Genetic Resources. U.S. Gov. Printing Off., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  62. Parker, E., D. Posey, J. Frechione, and L. F. da Silva. 1983. Resource exploitation in Amazonia: Ethnoecological examples from four populations. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 52: 163–203.Google Scholar
  63. Perelman, M. 1977. Farming for Profit in a Hungry World. Allanheld, New York.Google Scholar
  64. Peters, C. M., and E. Pardo-Tejeda. 1982.Brosimum alicastrum (Moraceae): Uses and potential in Mexico. Econ. Bot. 36: 166–175.Google Scholar
  65. Plucknett, D. L., and N. J. H. Smith. 1982. Agricultural research and Third World food production. Science 217: 215–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Posey, D. 1983. Indigenous ecological knowledge and development of the Amazon.In Moran, E., ed, The Dilemma of Amazonian Development. Westview, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  67. Rees, J. D. 1971. Forest Utilization by Tarascan Agriculturalists in Michoacan. Ph.D. diss., U.C.L. A. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  68. Rhoades, R. E., and R. H. Booth. 1983. Interdisciplinary teams in agricultural research and development. Cult. & Agric. 20: 1–7.Google Scholar
  69. Roseberry, W. 1976. Rent, differentiation and the development of capitalism among peasants. Amer. Anthropol. 78: 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rzedowski, J. 1966. Vegetatión del estado de San Luis Potosí. Actas Ci. Potosina 5: 1–191.Google Scholar
  71. —. 1978. Vegetatión de México. Ed. Limusa, Mexico City.Google Scholar
  72. Sanchez, P. A., D. E. Bandy, J. H. Villachica, and J. J. Nicholaides. 1982. Amazon basin soils: Management for continuous crop production. Science 216: 821–827.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Scott, J. C. 1976. The Moral Economy of the Peasant. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  74. Segerstrom, G. 1976. Creating work and caring about workers in tropical forestry. Unasylva 28 114: 2–9.Google Scholar
  75. Sharma, H. P. 1973. The Green Revolution in India: Prelude to a red one?In Gough, K., and H. P. Sharma, ed, Imperialism and Revolution in South Asia. Monthly Review Press, New York.Google Scholar
  76. Sorensen, E. R. 1976. The Edge of the Forest. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  77. Spears, J. S. 1981. Small farmers—or the tropical forest ecosystem? A review of sustainable land use systems of tropical forest areas.In Mergen, F., ed, Tropical Forests: Utilization and Conservation. Yale School of Forestry, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  78. Spurgeon, D. 1980. Agroforestry: A promising system of improved land management for Latin America. Interciencia 5: 176–178.Google Scholar
  79. Stavrakis, O. 1978. Ancient Maya agriculture and future development. Cult. & Agric. 5: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Taussig, M. 1978. Peasant economics and the development of capitalist agriculture in the Cauca Valley, Colombia. Latin Amer. Perspectives 5: 62–90.Google Scholar
  81. Toledo, V. M., A. Argueta, P. Rojas, C. Mapes, and J. Caballero. 1976. Uso multiple del ecosistema, estrategias del ecodesarrollo. Ci. Desarrollo 11: 33–39.Google Scholar
  82. UNESCO/UNEP/FAO. 1978. Tropical Forest Ecosystems. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  83. Uphof, J. C. 1968. Dictionary of Economic Plants. Verlag von J. Cramer, New York.Google Scholar
  84. Vadya, A. P. 1983. Progressive contextualization: Methods for research in human ecology. Human Ecology 11:265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vermeer, D. E. 1976. Food, farming, and the future: The role of traditional agriculture in the developing areas of the world. Social Sci. Quart. 57: 383–396.Google Scholar
  86. Wasserstrom, R. 1977. Land and labour in Central Chiapas: A regional analysis. Developm. & Change 8: 441–463.Google Scholar
  87. —. 1978. Population growth and economic development in Chiapas, 1524–1975. Human Ecology 6: 127–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Weaver, P. 1979. Agri-silviculture in tropical America. Unasylva 31: 2–12.Google Scholar
  89. Wilken, G. C. 1977. Integrating forest and small-scale farm systems in Middle America. Agro-Ecosystems 3: 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wilkes, G. 1983. Current status of crop plant germplasm. CRC Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 1: 133–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. —, and S. Wilkes. 1972. The Green Revolution. Environment 14: 32–39.Google Scholar
  92. Yen, D. E. 1974. Arboriculture in the subsistence of Santa Cruz, Solomon Islands. Econ. Bot. 28: 247–284.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janis B. Alcorn
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of Texas at Austin

Personalised recommendations