Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 4, Issue 1–2, pp 539–553 | Cite as

An exploration of methodologies for detecting subgroups, subsystems and cliques of firms in distribution channels

  • F. Wilkinson


Power Relation Distribution Channel Reciprocal Relation Direct Power Subgroup Membership 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Aldrich, H. “The Environment as a Network of Organizations: Theoretical and Methodological Implications,” International Sociological Association Conference, Toronto, Canada, August 1974.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, R.C., “A Sociometric Approach to the Analysis of Interorganizational Relationships,” Technical Bulletin B60, Institute for Community Development, Michigan State University, October 1969.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Assael, H. (ed.), The Politics of Distributive Trade Associations: A Study in Conflict Resolution, Hempstead, New York: Hofstra University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atkins, D. “Some Empirical Concerning Decision Making in Unstable Environments,” Presentation Operational Research Society Annual Conference, 1971.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Atkins, D. “Some Empirical Results Concerning the Modeling of an Industrial Distribution System,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick, 1972.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chabot, J. “A Simplified Example of the Use of Matrix Multiplication for the Analysis of Sociometric Data,” Sociometry, 13 (1950), 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Doreian, P. “A Note on the Detection of Cliques in Valued Graphs,” Sociometry, (1967), 237–242.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Galbraith, J.K. American Capitalism, London: Penguin Books, 1963.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hubbel, C.H., “An Input-out Approach to Clique Identification,” Sociometry, 28 (1965), 377–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kreisberg, L. “Occupational Controls Among Steel Distributors,” American Journal of Sociology, November 1955, 203–212.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lindzey, G. and D. Bryne. “Measurement of Social Choice and Interpersonal Attractiveness,” in G. Lindzey and E. Aaranson, eds., Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. II, 2nd ed., Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley, 1968.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Macrae, D., Jr. “Direct Factor Analysis of Sociometric Data,” Sociometry, 23 (1960), 360–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McGammon, B.C., Jr. “Perspectives for Distribution Programming,” in L.P. Bucklin (ed.), Vertical Marketing Systems, Glenview, Illinois: Scott-Foresman and Company, 1970.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mattsson, Lars-Gunnar. “On the Interaction Between Marketing Action Variables: A System Approach,” Working paper 1972–12, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, March 1972.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nosanchuk, T.A., “A Comparison of Several Sociometric Partitioning Techniques,” Sociometry, 26 (1963), 112–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Palamountain, J.C., The Politics of Distribution. Cambridge, Mass.: The Harvard University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Turk, H. Interorganizational Activation in Urban Communities, Rose Monograph Series, American Sociological Association, September 1973.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wilkinson, I.F. “Power Relations Between Firms in Distribution Channels: An Empirical Examination,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, 1972.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wilkinson, I.F. “Researching the Distribution Channels for Consumer and Industrial Goods,” Journal of the Market Research Society, January 1974.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Wilkinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Temple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations