An empirical test of linkages proposed in the walker, churchill, and ford model of salesforce motivation and performance
- 159 Downloads
In their model of salesforce motivation and performance, Ford, Churchill, and Walker hypothesize that a salesman's selling experience, participation in his supervisor's decision making, and closeness with which he is supervised are negatively related to his perception of role ambiguity and positively related to his job satisfaction. In addition, they hypothesize that the salesman's perception of role ambiguity is negatively related to his job satisfaction. The present study supports these hypotheses in terms of the following findings: (1) participation and closeness of supervision were negatively related to the salesman's perception of role ambiguity, (2) closeness of supervision was positively related to his extrinsic job satisfaction, and (3) participation was positively related to intrinsic job satisfaction. Finally, role ambiguity was negatively related to both extrinsic and intrinsic job satisfaction.
KeywordsRole Conflict Leader Behavior Role Ambiguity Close Supervision Extrinsic Reward
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Adams, Stacy J. “Structure and Dynamics of Organizational Boundary Roles”, in Marvin D. Dunnette,Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago, Illinois: Rand McNally College Publishing Company, 1976, 1175–99.Google Scholar
- 2.Alderfer, Clayton P. and Benjamin Schneider. “On the Structure of Human Needs”, Working Paper, Yale University.Google Scholar
- 7.Halpin, A. W. and B. J. Winer. “A Factorial Study of the Leader Behavior Description”, in R. M. Stagdill and A. E. Coons,Leader Behavior: Its Description and Measurement. Columbus, Ohio: Bureau of Business Research 1957.Google Scholar
- 8.Kahn, R. L., P. M. Wolfe, R. P. Quinn, J. D. Snoek, and R. H. Rosenthal.Organizational Stress. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1964.Google Scholar
- 9.Kerlinger, Fred N. and Elazar J. Pedhazur.Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1973.Google Scholar
- 11.Likert, R.New Patterns of Management. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1961.Google Scholar
- 12.Nunnally, Jum C.Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1967.Google Scholar
- 14.Porter, Lyman W. and Edward E. Lawler.Managerial-Attitudes and Performance. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1968.Google Scholar
- 18.Vroom, V.Some Personality Determinants of the Effects of Participation. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1963.Google Scholar