Skip to main content
Log in

Purchase constraint analysis: An alternative perspective for marketers

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The task of the marketer is to facilitate the exchange with consumers. This exchange process can be inhibited if consumers face constraints to the purchase. The focus of the marketer should be not only product attributes but also any constraining factors in the purchase environment. This article provides a framework to identify and discuss these purchase constraints. The constraints facing the consumer could be: marketing, cultural, social, personal, or structural constraints. In addition to the traditional dichotomy of controllable and uncontrollable constraints, it is suggested there are constraints that may not be uncontrollable but may be semicontrollable. A purchase constraint matrix is constructed to outline the constraints and is followed by the implications to marketing managers and researcher.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • “Liquor Marketers See Growth Potential,”Advertising Age, Vol. 49, No. 5 (January 30, 1978), pp. 1, 39–41, 58–59.

  • Bartels, Robert,Comparative Marketing: Wholesaling in Fifteen Countries, (Homewood, Ill: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1963), pp. 301–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, Russell W., “Situational Variables and Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Research, (December 1975), pp. 157–164; Sandell, Rolf Gunnar, “Effects of Attitudinal and Situation Factors on Reported Choice Behavior,” Vol. 5 (November 1968), pp. 405–408; Wicker, Allen W., “Processes Which Mediate Behavior-Environment Congruence,”Behavioral Science, Vol. 17 (1972), pp. 265–277.

  • Dillon, Thomas, “Forget Wants, Needs, Listen to Consumer Problems,”Marketing News, Vol. 11, (June 2, 1978), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, James F., David T. Kollat, and Roger D. Blackwell,Consumer Behavior, (Hinsdale, Illinois: Dryden Press, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haire, Mason, “Projective Techniques in Marketing Research,”Journal of Marketing, Vol. 14 (April, 1950), pp. 649–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, John A. and Jagdish N. Sheth,The Theory of Buyer Behavior, (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1969), pp. 139–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, Larry, “Light Says Problem Research Will Give More Benefits Than Benefit Research,”Marketing News, Vol. 9, (September 26, 1975), p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInnes, William, “A Conceptual Approach to Marketing,” in Reavis Cox, Wroe Alderson and Stanley J. Shapiro,Theory in Marketing, (Homewood, ill: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1964), pp. 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M.J., “Cognitive Structure and Attitudinal Affect,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 53, (1956), pp. 367–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tauber, Edward M., “Reduce New Product Failures: Measure Needs as Well as Purchase Interest,”Journal of Marketing, Vol. 37 (July 1973), pp. 61–70; Tauber, Edward M., “How Market Research Discourages Major Innovation,”Business Horizons, (June, 1974) pp. 22–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lepisto, L.R., Hannaford, W.J. Purchase constraint analysis: An alternative perspective for marketers. JAMS 8, 12–25 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721968

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721968

Keywords

Navigation