Skip to main content
Log in

An exploratory study of the effect of sex role stereotyping on attitudes toward magazine advertisements

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, sex role portrayals were manipulated in an advertisement created for the study. The roles used were professional and housewife. One hundred one respondents chosen from several southwest towns were exposed to either the professional version of the ad or the housewife version, and were asked to evaluate the ad on a semantic differential scale. One of the items in the scale was an evaluation of the role of the individual in the ad, and was used in a manipulation check. The result of the ad evaluations indicated significantly higher scores for the professional version of the ad than for the housewife version.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, Michael and G. Churchill. 1977. “The Impact of Physically Attractive Models on Advertising Evaluations.”Journal of Marketing Research 14 (Nov.): 538–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, Alice and S. Lockeretz. 1971. “A Woman’s Place: An Analysis of the Roles Portrayed by Women in Magazine Advertisements.”Journal of Marketing Research 8 (Feb.): 92–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominick, Joseph. 1979. “The Portrayal of Women in Prime Time: 1953–1977.”Sex Roles 5 (Aug.): 405–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominick, Joseph and G. Rausch. 1972. “The Image of Women in Network T. V. Commercials.”Journal of Broadcasting 16 (Summer): 259–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duker, Jacob and L. Tucker. 1977. “Women’s Lib-ers Versus Independent Women: A Study of Preferences for Women’s Roles in Advertising.”Journal of Marketing Research 14 (Nov.): 469–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundstrom, William and D. Sciglimpaglia. 1977. “Sex Role Portrayals in Advertising”.Journal of Marketing 41 (July): 72–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Andrew and J. Olsen. 1981. “Are Product Attributes the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitudes?”Journal of Marketing Research 18 (Aug.): 318–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peevers, Barbara. 1979. “Androgyny on the T.V. Screen? An Analysis of Sex Role Portrayals.”Sex Roles 5 (Dec.): 797–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Benson and T. Jerdee. 1974. “Influence of Sex Role Stereo-types on Personnel Decisions.”Journal of Applied Psychology 59 (Feb.): 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, John and L. Percy. 1978. “Visual Imaging Ability as a Mediator of Advertising Response.” InAdvances in Consumer Research. Ed. Keith Hunt, 621–29. Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, Virginia. 1973. “The Relationship Between Sex Role Stereotypes and Requisite Managerial Characteristics.”Journal of Applied Psychology 57 (Apr.): 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimp, Terence. 1981. “Attitude Toward the Ad as a Mediator of Consumer Brand Choice.”Journal of Advertising 10 (June): 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Louis and J. Banos. 1973. “A Woman’s Place: A Follow-Up Analysis of the Roles Portrayed by Women in Magazine Advertisements.”Journal of Marketing Research 10 (May): 213–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whipple, Thomas and A. Courtney. 1980. “How to Portray Women in T.V. Commercials.”Journal of Advertising Research 20 (Apr.): 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kilbourne, W.E. An exploratory study of the effect of sex role stereotyping on attitudes toward magazine advertisements. JAMS 14, 43–46 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721815

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721815

Keywords

Navigation