Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental sustainability and information systems: The similarity

  • Papers
  • Published:
Systems practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Application of information technology and environmental planning share two very important characteristics: they are both concerned with planning, evaluating, and directing human activity in a wider context, and this activity is multiaspectual, multimodal, and multidisciplinary in scope. Further, the ideal in both cases is sustainable, long-term activity that brings overall good rather than harm. This paper discusses the multiaspectual nature of environmental sustainability and shows briefly how this understanding can be translated to the field of information systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basden, A. (1996). Towards an understanding of contextualized technology. InManaging the Technoogical Society: The Next Century's Challenge to O.R., 1996 International Conference of the Swedish Operations Research Society, 1–3 Oct., University of Lule⇘, Lule⇘, Sweden.

  • Brandon, P. S., Basden, A., Hamilton, I., and Stockley, J. (1988).Expert Systems: Strategic Planning of Construction Projects, Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, P. S., Lombardi, P., and Bentivegna, V. (eds.) (1977).Evaluation of Sustainability in the Built Environment, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breheny, M. (ed.) (1992).Sustainable Development and Urban Form, Pion, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, A. (1995). Ethics, ecology and economics.Biodivers. Conserv. 4, 798–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camagni, R. (ed.) (1996).Economia e pianificazione della città sostenible, Il Mulino, Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castell, A. C., Basden, A., Erdos, G., Barrows, P., and Brandon, P. S. (1992). Knowledge based sytems in use: A case study.Proceedings, Expert Systems 92 (Applications Stream), British Computer Society Specialist Group for Knowledge-Based Systems.

  • Choay, F. (1965).L'Urbanisme. Utopies et réalitiés, Editions du Seuil, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clouser, R. A. (1991).The Myth of Religions Neutrality, University of Notre Dame, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R. J., Rousseau, D., and Theaker, I. T. (1993).Building Environmental Performance Assessment Criteria, Version I, Office Buildings, BEPAC Foundation, Vancouver, Dec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, G. L. (1995). An extensionist environmental ethic.Biodivers. Conserv. 4, 827–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R. (1993). Ecological economic system analysis: Order and choas. In Barbier, E. B. (ed.),Economics and Ecology, Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Raadt, J. D. R. (1994). Enhancing the horizon of information systems design: Information technology and cultural ecology (unpublished).

  • DeWitt, C. B. (1995). Ecology and ethics: Relation of religious belief to ecological practice in the Biblical tradition.Biodivers. Conserv. 4, 838–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooyeweerd, H. (1955).A New Critique of Theoretical Thought, 4 vols., Presbyterian and Reformed, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusco Girard, L. (1991). Verso una valutazione della qualită.Genio Rurale I(LIV), 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, P. (1915).Cities in Evolution, Williams and Norgate, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, A. (1995). The use and abuse of ecological concepts in environmental ethics.Biodivers. Conserv. 4, 812–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugo, V. (1832).Notre-Dame de Paris II ed., Gosselin, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P., and Vaughan, N. (1995). Development of an environmental and energy performance model for sustainable cities. In Brandon, P. S., Lombardi, P., and Bentivegna, V. (eds.),Evaluation of Sustainability in the Built Environment, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi, P. (1995). Evaluating sustainability at a local planning level. InProceedings of the International Research Workshop CIB TG-8, Linking & Prioritising Environmental Criteria, Toronto, Canada, pp. 89–100.

  • Lombardi, P., and Brousleu, P. S. (1997). Toward a multi-modal framework for evaluating the built environment quality. In Brandon, P. S., Lombardi, P., and Bentivegna, V. (eds.),Evaluation of Sustainability in the Built Environment, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1960).The Image of the City, Technology Press & Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, A. D., Mitchell, G., and Kupiszewska, D. (1997). The development of the Leeds quantifiable city model. In Brandon, P. S., Lombardi, P., and Bentivegna, V. (eds.),Evaluation of Sustainability in the Built Environment, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merret, S. (1995). Planning in the age of sustainability.Scand. Hous. Plan. Res. 12, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, G., May, A. D., and McDonald, A. (1995). PICABUE: A methodological framework for the development of indicators of sustainable development.Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2, 104–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J., and Cooper, I. (1996). Mapping out fuzzy buzzwords—Who sits where on sustainability and sustainable development. InInternational Sustainable Development Research Conference, Manchester Conference Centre, Manchester, England, 18–19 Mar.

  • Pearce, D., Markandya, A., and Barbier, E. B. (1989).Blueprint for a Green Economy, Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, J. (ed.) (1993).Building Research Establishment Environment Assessment Method, BREEAM, Version 1/93, New Offices, Building Research Establishment Report, 2nd ed.

  • Simon, H. (1985).Casualità, Razionalità, Organizzazione, Il Mulino, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (1992).Earth Summit '92 (Agenda 21), Regency Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voogd, H. (1995). Environmental management of social dilemmas.Eur. Spat. Res. Policy 2, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, B. (1995). Christian theological resources for environmental ethics.Biodivers. Conserv. 4, 849–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987).Our Common Future (The Brundtland Report), Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfield, M., and Basden, A. (1996). An ontologically based method for knowledge elicitation. InManaging the Technological Society: The Next Century's Challenge to O.R., 1996 International Conference of the Swedish Operations Research Society, 1–3 Oct., University of Lule⇘, Lule⇘, Sweden.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lombardi, P., Basden, A. Environmental sustainability and information systems: The similarity. Systems Practice 10, 473–489 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557893

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557893

Key Words

Navigation