Summary
Annulate lamellae (AL) were found in preblastoderm cytoplasm and nuclei of the giant milkweed bug,Oncopeltus fasciatus. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of such an occurrence among the insects. Cytoplasmic AL were scattered about the nucleus during early prophase and then accumulated during late prophase to form two dome-shaped arrays lying opposite each other with the nucleus interposed. Also, intranuclear annulate lamellae were found as single strands or vesicles within the nucleus during prophase.
References
Barer, R., Joseph, S., Meek, G.A.: The origin of the nuclear membrane. Exptl. Cell Res.18, 179–182 (1959).
Barer, R., Joseph, S., Meek, G.A.: The origin and fate of the nuclear membrane in meiosis. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Series B152, 353–366 (1960)
Comings, D.E., Okada, Tadashi, A.: Holocentric chromosomes inOncopeltus: Kinetochore plates are present in mitosis but absent in meiosis. Chromosoma (Berl.)37 (2), 117–192 (1972)
Cooper, K.W.: The nuclear cytology of the grass mite,Pediculopsis graminum (reut.), with special reference to karyomerokinesis. Chromosoma1, 51–103 (1939)
Cruickshank, W.J.: The formation of “Accessory Nuclei” and annulate lamellae in the oocytes of the flour moth,Anagasta kühniella. Z. Zellforsch.130, 181–192 (1972)
De Brabander, M., Borgers, M.: The formation of annulated lamellae induced by the disintegration of microtubules. J. Cell Sci.19, 331–340 (1975)
Edelman, G.M.: Some new views of the cell surface. J. Biochem.79, 1p-12p (1976)
Fiil, A.: Structural and functional modifications of the nucleus during oogenesis in the mosquito,Aedes aegypti. J. Cell Sci.14, 51–67 (1974)
Folliot, R.: Les lamelles annelées intranucléaires des cellules du tissu germinal mâle avant la méiose chezPhilaenus spumarius (L.) (Insecte Homoptère). Zeitschrift für Zellforschung92, 115–129 (1968)
Franke, W.W., Krien, S.: Nuclear membrane attached DNA enriched in repetitive sequences. Die Naturwissenschaften59, 37 (1972)
Gassner, G., Klemetson, D.J.: A transmission electron microscope examination of hemipteran and lepidopteran gonial centromeres. Can. J. Genet. Cytol.16, 457–464 (1974)
Gassner, G. III, Klemetson, D.J., Richard, R.D.: Spermiogenesis in house fly,Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae): A transmission electron microscope study. Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol.1 (2), 105–120 (1972)
Gassner, G., Sears, S.: Preblastoderm nuclear division in the embryo of the giant milkweed bug,Oncopeltus fasciatus Dallas. Differentiation7(1), 39–51 (1976)
Gay, H.: Nucleo-cytoplasmic relations in salivary-gland cells ofDrosophila. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA41, 370–375 (1955)
Hoage, T.R., Kessel, R.G.: An electron microscope study of the processes of differentiation during spermatogenesis in the drone honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) with special reference to centriole replication and elimination. J. Ultrastruc. Res.24, 6–32 (1968)
Kessel, R.G., Beams, H.W.: Annulate lamellae and “yolk nuclei” in oocytes of the dragonfly,Libellula pulchella. J. Cell Biol.42, 185–201 (1969)
King, P. E., Fordy, M.R.: The formation of “accessory nuclei” in the developing oocytes of the parasitoid HymenopteransOphion luteus (L.) andApanteles glomeratus (L.). Z. Zellforsch.109, 158–170 (1970)
King, R.C., Richards, J.G.: Accessory nuclei and annulate lamellae in hymenopteran oocytes. Nature218, 488 (1968)
King, R.C., Devine, R.L.: Oogenesis in adultDrosophila melanogaster. VII. The submicroscopic morphology of the ovary. Growth22, 299–326 (1958)
LaChance, L.E., Riemann, J.G.: Dominant lethal mutations in insects with holokinetic chromosomes. 1. Irradiation ofOncopeltus (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) sperm and oocytes. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am.66, 813–819 (1973)
Mahowald, A.P.: Ultrastructural differentiations during formation of the blastoderm in theDrosophila melanogaster embryo. Develop. Biol.8, 186–204 (1963)
Maul, G.G., Cross, P.C.: Thymidine incorporation by annulate lamellae of rabbit zygotes. J. Ultrastruct. Res.47, 115–124 (1974)
Nicklas, R.B., Staehly, C.A.: Chromosome micromanipulation. I. The mechanics of chromosome attachment to the spindle. Chromosoma21, 1–16 (1967)
Okada, E., Waddington, C.H.: The submicroscopic structure of theDrosophila egg. J. Embryol. Exptl. Morphol.7, 583–597 (1959)
Ollerich, D.A., Carlson, E.C.: Ultrastructure of intranuclear annulate lamellae in giant cells of rat placenta. J. Ultrastruct. Res.30, 411–422 (1970)
Pool, T.B., Hoage, T.R.: Intranuclear and cytoplasmic annulate lamellae in grasshopper spermatocytes (GenusMelanoplus). Cell Tiss. Res.156, 475–482 (1975)
Sakai, A., Shigenaga, M.: Behavior of cytoplasmic membranous structures in spermatogenesis of the grasshopper,Atractomorpha bedeli Bolivar. Cytologia32, 72–86 (1967)
Scheer, U., Franke, W.W.: Negative staining and adenosine triphosphate activity of annulate lamellae of newt oocytes. J. Cell Biol.42, 519–553 (1969)
Schwalm, F.E.: Changes in the formation of nuclear membranes and the ultrastructure of chromosomes during the early development of locust eggs (Locusta migratoria). Wilhelm Roux' Archiv.162, 41–55 (1969).
Spurr, A.R.: A low viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J. Ultrastruc. Res.26, 31–43 (1969).
Stay, B.: Protein uptake in the oocytes of the cecropia moth. J. Cell Biol.26, 49–62 (1965)
Swift, H.: The fine structure of annulate lamellae. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol.2, 414–418 (1956)
Waddington, C.H., Okada, E.: Some degenerative phenomena inDrosophila ovaries. J. Embryol. Exptl. Morphol.8, 341–348 (1960)
Wischnitzer, S.: The annulate lamellae review. Int. Rev. Cytol.27, 65–100 (1970)
Wolf, R.: Kinematik und Feinstruktur plasmatischer Faktorenbereiche des Eies vonWachtliella persicariae L. (Diptera). Wilhelm Roux' Archiv.162, 121–160 (1969)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported in part by U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Contract AT (49-7) 3028.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gassner, G., Sears, S. Annulate lamellae in hemipteran preblastoderm cytoplasm and nuclei. Wilhelm Roux' Archiv 181, 183–188 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00848441
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00848441