Steady-State Relative Permeability Measurements of Tight and Shale Rocks Considering Capillary End Effect

Rasoul Nazari Moghaddam; Mahmoud Jamiolahmady

doi:10.1007/s11242-019-01236-8

Transport in Porous Media

pp 1–22 | Cite as

Steady-State Relative Permeability Measurements of Tight and Shale Rocks Considering Capillary End Effect

Authors
Authors and affiliations

Rasoul Nazari Moghaddam
Mahmoud Jamiolahmady

Article

First Online: 29 January 2019

37 Downloads

Abstract

Relative permeability (k_r) data are the key factors for describing the behaviour of the multi-phase flow in porous media. During the k_r measurements of low-permeability rocks, high capillary pressure can cause a significant liquid hold-up at the core outlet. This liquid hold-up, which is known as capillary end effect (CEE), is the main difficulty for laboratory measurements of relative permeability (k_r) for tight and shale rocks. In this paper, a novel method is proposed to correct the CEE during the steady-state relative permeability (SS-k_r) measurements. The integrity of the proposed method is evaluated by a set of artificially generated data and the experimental SS-k_r data of an Eagle Ford shale sample. It is shown that accurate k_r data can be obtained using the proposed technique. This technique can be used to estimate reliable k_r data without any saturation profile measurement equipment, such as CT scan or MRI.

Keywords

Relative permeability Shale rock Capillary end effect Unconventional reservoirs Steady state

List of symbols

A: Area
K: Absolute permeability
q: Flow rate
S: Saturation
F: Liquid/gas flow rate ratio
P: Pressure
L: Length
x: Distance
F: Liquid/gas flow rate ratio
$ S_{\text{o}}^{*} $: Wetting phase (oil) saturation
$ \overline{S}_{\text{o}} $: Average wetting phase (oil) saturation
IFT: Interfacial tension
μ: Viscosity

Subscript

g: Gas
o: Oil
c: Capillary pressure
or: Residual oil
gr: Residual gas
ro: Oil relative permeability
rg: Gas relative permeability
out: Outlet
Exp: Experimental
CEE: Capillary end effect
unaf: Unaffected
t: Total
r: Relative

Abbreviations

CEE: Capillary end effect
SS: Steady state
LGR: Liquid/gas flow rate ratio

This is a preview of subscription content, to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted as a part of the Unconventional Gas and Gas-condensate Recovery Project at Heriot-Watt University. This research project is sponsored by Daikin, Dong Energy, Ecopetrol/Equion, ExxonMobil, GDF, INPEX, JX-Nippon, Petrobras, RWE, Saudi-Aramco and TOTAL, whose contribution is gratefully acknowledged.

Appendix 1

Gupta and Maloney (2016) proposed the intercept technique to correct CEE during relative permeability measurements. The intercept method was proposed to correct CEE errors from both pressure and saturation measurements for each LGR. In this technique, several measurements of rate versus pressure drop are required at the same LGR. The obtained trends in pressure drop versus rate and saturation versus rate will be used to correct the data for each single LGR. To correct the pressure data, one can start with Darcy’s equation as follows

$$ q_{t } \left( {1 - F} \right) = \frac{{ - Kk_{\text{rw}} A}}{{\mu_{\text{w}} L}}(\Delta P_{\text{theoritical without CEE}} ) $$

(A-1)

where $ \Delta P_{\text{theoritical without CEE}} $ is the pressure drop across the core without any capillary contribution to the pressure drop. $ \Delta P_{\text{theoritical without CEE}} $ can be expressed as the difference between the experimental pressure drop across the core $ \Delta P_{\text{Exp}} $ and the pressure drop resulting from the $ \Delta P_{\text{CEE}} $. Therefore,

$$ q_{t } \left( {1 - {\text{F}}} \right) = \frac{{ - Kk_{\text{rw}} A}}{{\mu_{\text{w}} L}}(\Delta P_{\text{Exp}} - \Delta P_{\text{CEE}} ) $$

(A-2)

Rearranging Eq. A-2 gives

$$ \Delta P_{\text{Exp}} = \left( {\frac{{\mu_{\text{w}} L\left( {1 - F} \right)}}{{Kk_{\text{rw}} A}}} \right)q_{t } + \Delta P_{\text{CEE}} $$

(A-3)

Using the above concept, Gupta and Maloney proposed to obtain $ \Delta P_{\text{CEE}} $ from the intercept of the plot of laboratory-measured pressure drop across the core ($ \Delta P_{\text{Exp}} $) and the injected total flow rate ($ q_{t } ). $

To correct the saturation data, they used the following overall saturation balance equation for a given fractional flow condition:

$$ L S_{\text{w, avg}} = \left( {L + x_{i} } \right)S_{\text{w, true}} + x_{i} S_{\text{w, CEE}} $$

(A-4)

where $ x_{i} $ is the length of CEE region, $ S_{\text{w, avg}} $ is average water saturation, $ S_{\text{w, CEE}} $ is average saturation of CEE region, and $ S_{\text{w, true}} $ is actual water saturation as shown in Fig. 10.

Fig. 10
Schematic of water saturation highlighting the average water saturation ($ S_{\text{w, avg}} $), average saturation of CEE region ($ S_{\text{w, CEE}} $) and asymptotic water saturation ($ S_{\text{w, true}} $) presented by Gupta and Maloney (2016)

They defined CEE length factor as $ \beta = \frac{{x_{i} }}{L} $ and proposed the following equation as a reliable concept to correct the saturations.

$$ \beta = \frac{{\Delta P_{\text{CEE}} }}{{\Delta P_{\text{Exp}} - \Delta P_{\text{CEE}} }} $$

(A-5)

Rearranging Equation A-4 and using Equation A-5 gives the expression

$$ \frac{1}{{\left( {1 - \beta } \right)}} S_{\text{w, avg}} = S_{\text{w, CEE}} \frac{\beta }{{\left( {1 - \beta } \right)}} + S_{\text{w,true}} $$

(A-6)

Based on Equation A-6, CEE-corrected saturation (i.e. $ S_{\text{w, true}} $) is the intercept of the plot of ($ \frac{1}{{\left( {1 - \beta } \right)}} S_{\text{w, avg}} ) $ and ($ \frac{\beta }{{\left( {1 - \beta } \right)}} $).

References

Al Hinai, A., Rezaee, R., Esteban, L., Labani, M.: Comparisons of pore size distribution: a case from the Western Australian gas shale formations. J. Unconv. Oil Gas Resour. 8, 1–13 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, G.R., Ross, D.J., Bustin, R.M.: Geological controls on matrix permeability of Devonian Gas Shales in the Horn River and Liard basins, northeastern British Columbia, Canada. Int. J. Coal Geol. 103, 120–131 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, A., Wood, A.: Rate effects on water-oil relative permeability. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 17–19 (2001)Google Scholar
Gupta, R., Maloney, D.R.: Intercept method: a novel technique to correct steady-state relative permeability data for capillary end effects. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 19, 316 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honarpour, M., Mahmood, S.: Relative-permeability measurements: an overview. J. Petrol. Technol. 40, 963–966 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honarpour, M., Koederitz, F., Herbert, A.: Relative permeability of petroleum reservoirs. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1986)Google Scholar
Huang, D.D., Honarpour, M.M.: Capillary end effects in coreflood calculations. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 19, 103–117 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iglauer, S., Favretto, S., Spinelli, G., Schena, G., Blunt, M.J.: X-ray tomography measurements of power-law cluster size distributions for the nonwetting phase in sandstones. Phys. Rev. E 82, 056315 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leverett, M.: Capillary behavior in porous solids. Trans. AIME 142, 152–169 (1941)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maini, B., Coskuner, G., Jha, K.: A comparison of steady-state and unsteady-state relative permeabilities of viscocities oil and water in Ottawa sand. J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 29, 55 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloney, D., Wegener, D., Zornes, D.: New x-ray scanning system for special core analyses in support of reservoir characterization. Pap. SCA 9940, 1–4 (1999)Google Scholar
Meng, Q., Liu, H., Wang, J.: A critical review on fundamental mechanisms of spontaneous imbibition and the impact of boundary condition, fluid viscosity and wettability. Adv. Geo Energy Res. 1, 1–17 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazari Moghaddam, R., Jamiolahmady, M.: Slip flow in porous media. Fuel 173, 298–310 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osoba, J., Richardson, J., Kerver, J., Hafford, J., Blair, P.: Laboratory measurements of relative permeability. J. Petrol. Technol. 3, 47–56 (1951)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qadeer, S., Dehghani, K., Ogbe, D., Ostermann, R.: Correcting Oil–Water Relative Permeability Data for Capillary End Effect in Displacement Experiments. Springer, Berlin (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoport, L., Leas, W.: Properties of linear waterfloods. J. Petrol. Technol. 5, 139–148 (1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J., Kerver, J., Hafford, J., Osoba, J.: Laboratory determination of relative permeability. J. Petrol. Technol. 4, 187–196 (1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanenko, K., Balcom, B.J.: An assessment of non-wetting phase relative permeability in water-wet sandstones based on quantitative MRI of capillary end effects. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 110, 225–231 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, J., Bae, J.: An automated steady-state relative permeability measurement system. Pap. SPE 17217, 0.012–010.002 (1987)Google Scholar
Virnovsky, G., Skjaeveland, S., Surdal, J., Ingsoy, P.: Steady-state relative permeability measurements corrected for capillary effects. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE 30541, Society of Petroleum Engineers (1995)Google Scholar
Virnovsky, G., Vatne, K., Skjaeveland, S., Lohne, A.: Implementation of multirate technique to measure relative permeabilities accounting. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers (1998)Google Scholar
Withjack, E.: Computed tomography for rock-property determination and fluid-flow visualization. SPE Form. Eval. 3, 696–704 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

Authors and Affiliations

Rasoul Nazari Moghaddam
- 1
Email authorView author's OrcID profile
Mahmoud Jamiolahmady
- 1

1.Institute of Petroleum Engineering, School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and SocietyHeriot-Watt UniversityEdinburghUK

Steady-State Relative Permeability Measurements of Tight and Shale Rocks Considering Capillary End Effect

Abstract

Keywords

List of symbols

Subscript

Abbreviations

Notes

Acknowledgements

References

Copyright information

Authors and Affiliations

Personalised recommendations

Cite article