Seasonal effects of climate change on intra-day electricity demand patterns
Climate change threatens all parts of the US electric power system, from electricity generation to distribution. An important dimension of this issue is the impact on electricity demand. While many studies have looked at these impacts, few have tried to represent this effect at higher temporal resolutions (such as daily or sub-daily) or to analyze its seasonal aspects. Our study expands on previous work to improve our understanding of how climate change can affect patterns of hourly electricity demand, the differences in these effects over different seasons, and how this in turn could affect the operations of the power system. For this analysis, we combine a linear regression model, a simplified economic dispatch model, and projections from twenty different climate models to analyze how climate change may affect seasonal demand patterns and, consequently, power plants dispatch. We use this method to analyze a case study of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). The results suggest that climate change can result in an average increase in annual electricity consumption in the TVA region of 6% by the end of the century and an increase in the frequency of peak demand values (the maximum quantity of electricity demanded during an hour). However, this increase is not uniformly distributed throughout the year. During summer, total electricity consumption can increase on average by 20% while during winter, it may decrease on average by 6% by the end of the century. Such changes in demand could result in changes in the typical dispatch patterns of TVA’s power plants. Estimated summer time capacity factors would increase (8 to 37% for natural gas and 71 to 84% for coal) and winter time capacity factor decrease (3% to virtually zero for natural gas and 67 to 60% for coal). Such results could affect the decision-making process of planning agents in the power sector.
The authors would like to thank Prof. Alex Davis in the Engineering and Public Policy Department at Carnegie Mellon University for his suggestions on the model formulation. We also thank Bart Nijssen and Yifan Cheng at the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in the University of Washington for sharing their climate model data with us and their help processing the data using MTCLIM. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) as part of the Resilient Interdependent Infrastructure Processes and Systems (RIPS) program via Grant Number EFRI-1441131.
Compliance with ethical standards
The results and conclusions of this paper are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not represent the views of the funding sources.
- Aroonruengsawat A, Auffhammer M (2011) Impacts of climate change on residential electricity consumption: evidence from billing data. The Economics of climate change: Adaptations Past and PresentGoogle Scholar
- Blumsack S, Samaras C, Hines P (2008) Long-term electric system investments to support plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. In: Energy Society General Meeting, IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
- DOE (2016) Climate change and the electricity sector: guide for climate change resilience planning. Tech. rep., U.S. Department of EnergyGoogle Scholar
- FERC (2016) Form No. 714 - Annual Electric Balancing Authority Area and Planning Area ReportGoogle Scholar
- Hadley SW, Tsvetkova AA (2009) Potential impacts of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on regional power generation. Electr J 22(10):56–68Google Scholar
- Holladay JS, Davis RJ (2016) Energy intensity and electricity consumption in tennessee. Tech. rep., Howard H. Baker Jr. Center for Public PolicyGoogle Scholar
- McFarland J, Zhou Y, Clarke L, Sullivan P, Colman J, Jaglom WS, Colley M, Patel P, Eom J, Kim SH, Kyle GP, Schultz P, Venkatesh B, Haydel J, Mack C, Creason J (2015) Impacts of rising air temperatures and emissions mitigation on electricity demand and supply in the United States: a multi-model comparison. Clim Chang 131(1):111–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell KE, Lohmann D, Houser PR, Wood EF, Schaake JC, Robock A, Cosgrove BA, Sheffield J, Duan Q, Luo L, Higgins RW, Pinker RT, Tarpley JD, Lettenmaier DP, Marshall CH, Entin JK, Pan M, Shi W, Koren V, Meng J, Ramsay BH, Bailey AA (2004) The multi-institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system. J Geophys Res: Atmospheres 109(D7):7449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- PRISM Climate Group (2004) PRISM Climate DataGoogle Scholar
- Roberts D (2018) After rising for 100 years, electricity demand is flat. Utilities are freaking out. VoxGoogle Scholar
- Stern N (2009) Economics, ethics and climate change. In: The economics of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 25–45Google Scholar
- Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Taylor KE, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. dxdoiorg 93(4):485–498Google Scholar
- US Energy Information Agency (2016a) Form EIA-923 detailed data with previous form data (EIA-906/920)Google Scholar
- US Energy Information Agency (2016b) Winter residential electricity consumption expected to increase from last winter. Tech. rep.Google Scholar
- US Environmental Protection Agency (2015) Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID)Google Scholar
- US IAWG (2010) Technical support document: social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis under executive order 12866. Tech. rep., Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of CarbonGoogle Scholar