Abstract
The purpose of our student-led project was to fulfill junior medical students’ demand for instructive, curriculum-specific practice questions while providing a learning experience and teaching opportunity for participating senior students. Eleven second-year students were taught how to write high-quality multiple-choice questions through an interactive workshop. Subsequently, they were instructed to write questions with detailed explanations for their assigned lecture topics. Thirty-four student-written and faculty-reviewed questions were combined with 16 purely faculty-written questions to create a 50-question exam. No significant difference was found in question difficulty between the student-written (79.5%) and faculty-written (84.0%) questions (p = 0.37). The discrimination index and point biserial correlation were higher for student-written (0.29, 0.32) vs. faculty-written (0.17, 0.25) questions (p < .01, < .05). The test-takers learned key course topics, while the test-writers reviewed key first-year objectives and refined their test-taking strategies. The project provided a model for feasibly developing comprehensive, high-quality, and curriculum-specific questions.
References
Norcini JJ, Swanson DB, Grosso LJ, Webster GD. Reliability, validity and efficiency of multiple choice question and patient management problem item formats in assessment of clinical competence. Med Educ. 1985;19(3):238–47.
Velan GM, Jones P, McNeil HP, Kumar RK. Integrated online formative assessments in the biomedical sciences for medical students: benefits for learning. BMC Medical Education. 2008;8(1):52.
Green ML, Moeller JJ, Spak JM. Test-enhanced learning in health professions education: a systematic review: BEME guide no. 48 Medical teacher. 2018;40(4):337–50.
Haladyna TM, Downing SM. Validity of a taxonomy of multiple-choice item-writing rules. Appl Meas Educ. 1989;2(1):51–78.
Paniagua M, Swygert K. Constructing written test questions for the basic and clinical. sciences. 2016.
Kelley TL. The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. J Educ Psychol. 1939;30(1):17–24.
Walsh J, Harris B, Tayyaba S, Harris D, Smith P. Student written single best answer questions predict performance in finals. Clin Teach. 2016;13(5):352–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
IRB exempt
Informed Consent
NA
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shah, M.P., Lin, B.R., Lee, M. et al. Student-Written Multiple-Choice Questions—a Practical and Educational Approach. Med.Sci.Educ. 29, 41–43 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-018-00646-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-018-00646-5