Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Armand Hatchuel and the Refoundation of Management Research: Design Theory and the Epistemology of Collective Action

The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers

  • 135 Accesses

Abstract

Armand Hatchuel’s work marks a turning point in management research and paves the way for a refoundation of management science. Hatchuel’s research deals with organizational metabolism rather than organizational change, as he is concerned with the drivers of change and with the organization of innovative collective action. Several theoretical milestones can be put forward. First, Hatchuel offers a theory of the cognitive processes of generativity: while decision theory targets optimization by supporting the selection of a solution, “C-K theory” is a design theory. It accounts for the generation of new alternatives by expanding what is known, this process being driven by desirable unknowns. This theory has provided the theoretical cornerstone characterizing the rationality and organization of innovative or design-oriented collective action. Second, in Hatchuel’s view, learning and organizational dynamics are tightly bound. Learning processes are hosted and supported by social relationships, which, in turn, are shaped by the distribution of knowledge. Hatchuel proposes a theory of collective action whereby knowledge and relationships are involved in a dynamic interplay: this theory shows that both markets and hierarchies are special and highly unstable forms of organization, because they imply that either knowledge or relationships are frozen. Management scholars contribute to the study of generative forms of collective action: Hatchuel argues that management science, far from being applied economics or applied sociology, is a basic science devoted to the design and study of new models of collective action. He therefore opens up promising avenues for programs on post-decision paradigms and creative institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agogué, M., & Kazakçi, A. (2014). 10 years of C-K theory: A survey on the academic and industrial impacts of a design theory. In A. Chakrabarti & L. Blessing (Eds.), An anthology of theories and models of design. Philosophy, approaches and empirical explorations (pp. 219–235). Bangalore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agogué, M., Kazakçi, A., Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., Weil, B., Poirel, N., & Cassotti, M. (2014). The impact of type of examples on originality: Explaining fixation and stimulation effects. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 48(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayol, H. (1917). Administration Industrielle et Générale. Paris: Dunod et Pinat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayol, H. (1918). Notice sur les travaux scientifiques et techniques de M. Henri fayol. Paris: Gauthier-Villars et Cie Editeurs. Online at the website of the French national library: http://www.gallica.bnf.fr/(http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k904289.r=notice+fayol.langFR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (1994). Frédérick Taylor, une lecture épistémologique. L’expert, le théoricien et le doctrinaire. In J.-P. Bouilloud & B.-P. Lécuyer (Eds.), L’invention de la gestion (pp. 53–64). Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (1995). Les marchés à prescripteurs. Crises de l’échange et genèse sociale. In A. Jacob & H. Vérin (Eds.), L’inscription sociale du marché (pp. 205–225). Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (1996). Coordination and control international encyclopedia of business & management. London: Thomson Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (1997). Fondements des savoirs et légitimité des règles. In J.-P. Dupuy, B. Reynaud, & P. Livet (Eds.), Les limites de la rationalité (Vol. 2, pp. 181–209). Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (1998). Organisations et marchá : la place des prescripteurs. Eléments d’une axiomatique de l’action collective. Condor Seminar, MINES ParisTech, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (1999a). Connaissances, modèles d’interaction et rationalisations. Revue d’Économie Industrielle, 88, 187–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (1999b). The Foucauldian Detour: A rebirth of organization theory? Human Relations, 52(4), 507–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (2001a). Quel horizon pour les sciences de gestion ? Vers une théorie de l’action collective. In A. David, A. Hatchuel, & R. Laufer (Eds.), Les nouvelles fondations des sciences de gestion, éléments d’épistémologie en management. Paris: Vuibert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (2001b). Towards design theory and expandable rationality: The unfinished program of Herbert Simon. Journal of Management and Governance, 5(3–4), 260–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (2001c). The two pillars of new management research. British Journal of Management, 12(Special Issue), 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (2004). Histoire des révolutions de la gestion des entreprises. La Documentation française, Problèmes économiques, 2(852), 43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (2005). Towards an epistemology of collective action: Management research as a responsive and actionable discipline. European Management Review, 2, 36–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (2006). Quelle analytique de la conception ? Parure et pointe en Design. In B. Flamand (Ed.), Le Design. Essais sur des théories et des pratiques. Paris: Institut Français de la Mode. Editions du Regard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (2007). Epistémologie de l’action et genèse des sciences sociales. L’expérience des sciences de gestion. In A.-C. Martinet (Ed.), Sciences du management. Epistémique, pragmatique et éthique. Paris: Vuibert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (2008). Du raisonnement de conception. Essai sur le “forcing” en théorie des ensembles. In A. Hatchuel & B. Weil (Eds.), Les nouveaux régimes de conception (pp. 133–149). Paris: Vuibert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (2011). Paul Desjardins et les courants rationalisateurs. Autour de Auguste Detoeuf. In E. H. Sylvain Allemand, C. Paulhan (Eds.), De Pontigny à Cerisy: des lieux pour “penser avec ensemble.” Paris, Hermann Editeurs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (2013). Deconstructing meaning: Industrial design as Adornment and Wit. Paper presented at the 10th European Academy of Design Conference, Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (2016). Henri Fayol et la théorie du chef d’entreprise: une nouvelle figure de l’autorité au tournant du XXe siècle. Entreprises et Histoire, 2(83), 108–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A., & David, A. (2007). Collaborating for management research: from action research to intervention research in management. In A. B. Shani, S. A. Mohrman, W. A. Pasmore, B. A. Stymne, & A. Niclas, (Eds.), Handbook of Collaborative Management Research. Thousands Oaks: Sage, 143–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A., & Molet, H. (1986). Rational modelling in understanding and aiding human decision-making: About two case-studies. European Journal of Operational Research, 24, 178–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A., & Ponssard, J.-P. (1996). Taylor et la théorie des incitations, quelques réflexions tirées de l’histoire économique: Cahier du Centre d’Econométrie de l’Ecole Polytechnique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (1995). Experts in organization, a knowledge-based perspective on organizational change (trans: L. Librecht.). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (1996). Entre individus et organisation, la dynamique des savoirs dans les transformations industrielles contemporaines. Educations, 13, pp. 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (1999). Design-oriented Organizations: Toward a unified theory of design activities. Paper presented at the 6th International Product Development Management Conference (IPDM), EIASM, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (2002). C-K theory: Notions and applications of a unified design theory. Paper presented at the Herbert Simon International Conference on “Design Sciences”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (2009). C-K design theory: An advanced formulation. Research in Engineering Design, 19, 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., & Weil, B. (2001). From R&D to R-I-D: Design strategies and the management of “innovation fields”. EIASM, 8th international Product Development Management Conference. Enschede: University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A., Starkey, K., & Pezet, E. (Eds.). (2005). Gouvernement, organisation et entreprise: l’héritage de Michel Foucault, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A., Weil, B., & Le Masson, P. (2006). Building innovation capabilities: The development of design-oriented organizations. In J. T. Hage & M. Meeus (Eds.), Innovation, science and industrial change, the handbook of research. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A., Weil, B., & Le Masson, P. (2013). Towards an ontology of design: Lessons from C-K design theory and forcing. Research in Engineering Design, 24(2), 147–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Masson, P., Weil, B., Hatchuel, A., & Cogez, P. (2012). Why aren’t they locked in waiting games? Unlocking rules and the ecology of concepts in the semiconductor industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(6), 617–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levillain, K., Hatchuel, A., & Segrestin, B. (2014). The blind spot of Corporate Social Responsibilities: Changing the legal framework of the firm. Paper presented at the EURAM, Valence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinet, A.-C. (1990). Grandes questions épistémologiques et sciences de gestion. In A.-C. Martinet (Ed.), Epistémologies et sciences de gestion (pp. 9–29). Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moisdon, J.-C. (1984). Recherche en gestion et intervention. Revue Française de Gestion, (september-october) 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segrestin, B., & Hatchuel, A. (2011). Beyond agency theory, a post-crisis view of corporate law. British Journal of Management, 22, 484–499. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00763.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segrestin, B., & Hatchuel, A. (2012). Refonder l’entreprise. Paris: Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • On the notion of “prescribing relationships”, see: Hatchuel, 1995, 1998, 2000; Hatchuel & Weil, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • On C-K Theory, see: Elmquist & Segrestin, 2007; Hatchuel, Le Masson, & Weil, 2004; Hatchuel & Weil, 2002, 2009; Kazakçi & Tsoukias, 2005; Pascal Le Masson, Weil, & Hatchuel, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • On the theory of collective action and creative institutions, see: David & Hatchuel, 2007; Hatchuel, 1994a, 1994c, 1996, 2001b, 2001c, 2004, 2005, 2008a, 2013; Hatchuel, Le Masson, & Weil, 2005; Hatchuel, Starkey, Tempest, & Le Masson, 2010; Hatchuel & Weil, 2009; Hatchuel et al., 2006; Hatchuel et al., 2013; Pascal Le Masson, Hatchuel, & Weil, 2010; Segrestin & Hatchuel, 2011, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, A., & Hatchuel, A. (2007). From actionable knowledge to universal theory in management research. In R. A. B. Shani, S. A. Mohrman, W. A. Pasmore, B. Stymne, & N. Adler (Eds.), Handbook of collaborative management. Thousands Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmquist, M., & Segrestin, B. (2007). Towards a new logic for front-end management: From drug discovery to drug design in pharmaceutical companies. Creativity and Innovation Management Journal, 16(2), 106–120. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (1994). Les savoirs de l’intervention en entreprise. Entreprises et Histoire, 7, 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (2000). Rapport de prescription et conception collective du travail. Paper presented at the Journées de Bordeaux sur les pratiques de l’ergonomie, Bordeaux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. (2008). Agency. In S. Clegg & J. R. Bailey (Eds.), International encyclopedia of organization studies. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (1996). La dynamique des savoirs dans les transformations industrielles contemporaines. Educations Permanentes, 13, 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., & Weil, B. (2004). C-K theory in practice: Lessons from industrial applications. Paper presented at the The Design Society, Dubrovnik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., & Weil, B. (2005). The development of science-based products: Managing by design spaces. Creativity and Innovation Management Journal, 14(4), 345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A., Starkey, K., Tempest, S., & Le Masson, P. (2010). Strategy as innovative design: An emerging perspective. Advances in Strategic Management, 27, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazakçi, A. O., & Tsoukias, A. (2005). The C-K design theory: A theoretical background for personal design assistants. Journal of Engineering Design, 16(4), 399–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Masson P. (2001) De la R&D à la RID: modélisation des fonctions de la conception et nouvelles organisations de la R&D. Paris: Ecole des Mines de Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Masson, P., Weil, B., & Hatchuel, A. (2006). Les processus d’innovation. Conception innovante et croissance des entreprises. Paris: Hermès.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Masson, P., Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (2010). Strategic management of innovation and design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University, CGS -Centre de gestion scientifique, i3 UMR CNRS 9217, 60 Bd St Michel, 75006, Paris, France

    Blanche Segrestin, Franck Aggeri & Pascal Le Masson

  2. M-Lab, Dauphine Université, PSL Research University, Paris, France

    Albert David

Authors
  1. Blanche Segrestin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Franck Aggeri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Albert David
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pascal Le Masson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Blanche Segrestin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. The George Washington University , Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    David B. Szabla

  2. Columbia University , New York, New York, USA

    William A. Pasmore

  3. The George Washington University , College Park, Maryland, USA

    Mary A. Barnes

  4. Columbia University , New York, New York, USA

    Asha N. Gipson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Segrestin, B., Aggeri, F., David, A., Le Masson, P. (2017). Armand Hatchuel and the Refoundation of Management Research: Design Theory and the Epistemology of Collective Action. In: Szabla, D., Pasmore, W., Barnes, M., Gipson, A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_80-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_80-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49820-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49820-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Hatchuel, Armand, and the Refoundation of Management Research: Design Theory and the Epistemology of Collective Action
    Published:
    18 November 2020

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_80-2

  2. Original

    Armand Hatchuel and the Refoundation of Management Research: Design Theory and the Epistemology of Collective Action
    Published:
    21 March 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_80-1

Search

Navigation