Abstract
Technology has revolutionized the way we produce and exchange information and developed new modes of communication and socialization. Implicated in relations of power, these digitally mediated practices are not ideologically neutral. They shape the representation of meanings and identities, the circulation of knowledge, the construction of social networks and formations, redefining notions of private and public space, while privileging and marginalizing ideas, cultures, and people. As technology increasingly becomes an integral component of learning, this chapter asserts that learners must develop a critical digital literacy to become more aware of how power operates in digital spaces, shaping ways of thinking and doing that are implicated in social and cultural reproduction. By sharpening this critical lens, learners equip themselves with the capacity to examine linguistic and nonlinguistic features of digital media, their biases and assumptions, in order to verify information and access the truth.
References
Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. F. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–58). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
Bucher, T. (2013). The friendship assemblage: Investigating programmed sociality on Facebook. Television & New Media, 14(6), 479–493.
Darvin, R. (2016). Language and identity in the digital age. In S. Preece (Ed.), Routledge handbook of language and identity (pp. 523–540). Oxon: Routledge.
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2014). Social class, identity, and migrant students. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 13(2), 111–117.
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 36–56.
Delanty, G. (2006). The cosmopolitan imagination: Critical cosmopolitanism and social theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 25–47.
Dooley, K., & Exley, B. (2015). Afterschool MediaClub: Critical literacy in a high diversity, high poverty urban setting. In B. Yoon & R. Sharif (Eds.), Critical literacy practice: Applications of critical theory in diverse settings (pp. 41–56). London: Springer.
Elliott, A., & Urry, J. (2010). Mobile lives. Oxon: Routledge.
Facer, K. (2011). Learning futures: Education, technology and social change. London: Routledge.
Gee, J. P., & Hayes, E. R. (2011). Language and learning in the digital age. Oxon: Routledge.
Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. Boczkwowski, & K. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality and society (pp. 167–193). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Giroux, H. (1994). Disturbing pleasures: Learning popular culture. London: Routledge.
Granka, L. (2010). The politics of search: A decade retrospective. The Information Society, 26(5), 364–374.
Hansen, D. (2010). Cosmopolitanism and education: A view from the ground. The Teachers College Record, 112(1), 1–30.
Harnad, S. (1991). Post-Gutenberg galaxy: The fourth revolution in the means of production and knowledge. Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 2(1), 39–53.
Heath, S. B., & Street, B. (2008). On ethnography: Approaches to language and literacy research, Language & literacy (NCRLL). New York: Teachers College Press.
Hull, G. A., & Stornaiuolo, A. (2014). Cosmopolitan literacies, social networks, and “proper distance”: Striving to understand in a global world. Curriculum Inquiry, 44(1), 15–44.
Janks, H. (2000). Domination, access, diversity and design: A synthesis for critical literacy education. Educational Review, 52(2), 175–186.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jones, R. H., & Hafner, C. A. (2012). Understanding digital literacies: A practical introduction. Oxon: Routledge.
Kirkpatrick, G. (2008). Technology and social power. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
Labbo, L. D., Reinking, D., & McKenna, M. C. (1998). Technology and literacy education in the next century: Exploring the connection between work and schooling. Peabody Journal of Education, 73(3–4), 273–289.
Langlois, G. (2013). Participatory culture and the new governance of communication the paradox of participatory media. Television & New Media, 14(2), 91–105.
Luke, C. (2003). Pedagogy, connectivity, multimodality, and interdisciplinarity. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 397–403.
Luke, A. (2014). Defining critical literacy. In J. Avila & J. Z. Pandya (Eds.), Moving critical literacies forward: A new look at praxis across contexts (pp. 19–31). New York: Routledge.
McKee, H. A. (2011). Policy matters now and in the future: Net neutrality, corporate data mining, and government surveillance. Computers and Composition, 28(4), 276–291.
Merchant, G. (2007). Writing the future in the digital age. Literacy, 41(3), 118–128.
Murthy, M. (2015). Poor internet for poor people: Why Facebook’s Internet.org amounts to economic racism. Retrieved from http://scroll.in/article/721541/poor-internet-for-poor-people-why-facebooks-internet-org-amounts-to-economic-racism
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93.
Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation (2nd ed.). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Norton, B., & Williams, C. J. (2012). Digital identities, student investments and eGranary as a placed resource. Language and Education, 26(4), 315–329.
Norton Peirce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9–31.
Page, R. E. (2012). Stories and social media: Identities and interaction. Oxon: Routledge.
Pangrazio, L. (2013). Young people and Facebook: What are the challenges to adopting a critical engagement? Digital Culture and Education, 5(1), 34–47.
Pangrazio, L. (2016). Reconceptualising critical digital literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(2), 163–174.
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. New York: Penguin.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2011). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/1__p21_framework_2-pager.pdf
Peters, M., & Lankshear, C. (1996). Critical literacy and digital texts. Educational Theory, 46(1), 51–70.
Poore, M. (2011). Digital literacy: Human flourishing and collective intelligence in a knowledge society. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 19(2), 20.
Prinsloo, M., & Rowsell, J. (2012). Digital literacies as placed resources in the globalised periphery. Language and Education, 26(4), 271–277.
Santo, R. (2013). Hacker literacies: User-generated resistance and reconfiguration of networked publics. In J. Avila & J. Z. Pandya (Eds.), Critical digital literacies as social praxis: Intersections and challenges. New York: Peter Lang.
Sassen, S. (2008). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Snyder, I., & Prinsloo, M. (2007). Young people’s engagement with digital literacies in marginal contexts in a globalised world. Language and Education, 21(3), 171–179.
Street, B. (2003). What’s “new” in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.
Thorne, S. L. (2013). Digital literacies. In M. Hawkins (Ed.), Framing languages and literacies: Socially situated views and perspectives (pp. 192–218). New York: Routledge.
Warriner, D. S. (2007). Transnational literacies: Immigration, language learning, and identity. Linguistics and Education, 18(3), 201–214.
Warschauer, M. (2009). Digital literacy studies: Progress and prospects. In M. Baynham & M. Prinsloo (Eds.), The future of literacy studies (pp. 123–140). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Wohlwend, K. E., & Lewis, C. (2011). Critical literacy, critical engagement, and digital technology: Convergence and embodiment in glocal spheres. In D. Lapp & D. Fisher (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (3rd ed., pp. 188–194). Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Darvin, R. (2017). Language, Ideology, and Critical Digital Literacy. In: Thorne, S., May, S. (eds) Language, Education and Technology. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_35-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_35-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02328-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02328-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Language, Ideology, and Critical Digital Literacy- Published:
- 28 March 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_35-2
-
Original
Language, Ideology, and Critical Digital Literacy- Published:
- 15 February 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_35-1