Skip to main content

Language, Ideology, and Critical Digital Literacy

Language, Education and Technology

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Language and Education ((ELE))

  • 122 Accesses

Abstract

Technology has revolutionized the way we produce and exchange information and developed new modes of communication and socialization. Implicated in relations of power, these digitally mediated practices are not ideologically neutral. They shape the representation of meanings and identities, the circulation of knowledge, the construction of social networks and formations, redefining notions of private and public space, while privileging and marginalizing ideas, cultures, and people. As technology increasingly becomes an integral component of learning, this chapter asserts that learners must develop a critical digital literacy to become more aware of how power operates in digital spaces, shaping ways of thinking and doing that are implicated in social and cultural reproduction. By sharpening this critical lens, learners equip themselves with the capacity to examine linguistic and nonlinguistic features of digital media, their biases and assumptions, in order to verify information and access the truth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. F. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–58). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucher, T. (2013). The friendship assemblage: Investigating programmed sociality on Facebook. Television & New Media, 14(6), 479–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darvin, R. (2016). Language and identity in the digital age. In S. Preece (Ed.), Routledge handbook of language and identity (pp. 523–540). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2014). Social class, identity, and migrant students. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 13(2), 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 36–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delanty, G. (2006). The cosmopolitan imagination: Critical cosmopolitanism and social theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, K., & Exley, B. (2015). Afterschool MediaClub: Critical literacy in a high diversity, high poverty urban setting. In B. Yoon & R. Sharif (Eds.), Critical literacy practice: Applications of critical theory in diverse settings (pp. 41–56). London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, A., & Urry, J. (2010). Mobile lives. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facer, K. (2011). Learning futures: Education, technology and social change. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P., & Hayes, E. R. (2011). Language and learning in the digital age. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. Boczkwowski, & K. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality and society (pp. 167–193). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1994). Disturbing pleasures: Learning popular culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granka, L. (2010). The politics of search: A decade retrospective. The Information Society, 26(5), 364–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, D. (2010). Cosmopolitanism and education: A view from the ground. The Teachers College Record, 112(1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S. (1991). Post-Gutenberg galaxy: The fourth revolution in the means of production and knowledge. Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 2(1), 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, S. B., & Street, B. (2008). On ethnography: Approaches to language and literacy research, Language & literacy (NCRLL). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G. A., & Stornaiuolo, A. (2014). Cosmopolitan literacies, social networks, and “proper distance”: Striving to understand in a global world. Curriculum Inquiry, 44(1), 15–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janks, H. (2000). Domination, access, diversity and design: A synthesis for critical literacy education. Educational Review, 52(2), 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. H., & Hafner, C. A. (2012). Understanding digital literacies: A practical introduction. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, G. (2008). Technology and social power. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Labbo, L. D., Reinking, D., & McKenna, M. C. (1998). Technology and literacy education in the next century: Exploring the connection between work and schooling. Peabody Journal of Education, 73(3–4), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, G. (2013). Participatory culture and the new governance of communication the paradox of participatory media. Television & New Media, 14(2), 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, C. (2003). Pedagogy, connectivity, multimodality, and interdisciplinarity. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 397–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2014). Defining critical literacy. In J. Avila & J. Z. Pandya (Eds.), Moving critical literacies forward: A new look at praxis across contexts (pp. 19–31). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, H. A. (2011). Policy matters now and in the future: Net neutrality, corporate data mining, and government surveillance. Computers and Composition, 28(4), 276–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, G. (2007). Writing the future in the digital age. Literacy, 41(3), 118–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy, M. (2015). Poor internet for poor people: Why Facebook’s Internet.org amounts to economic racism. Retrieved from http://scroll.in/article/721541/poor-internet-for-poor-people-why-facebooks-internet-org-amounts-to-economic-racism

  • New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation (2nd ed.). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B., & Williams, C. J. (2012). Digital identities, student investments and eGranary as a placed resource. Language and Education, 26(4), 315–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton Peirce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, R. E. (2012). Stories and social media: Identities and interaction. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pangrazio, L. (2013). Young people and Facebook: What are the challenges to adopting a critical engagement? Digital Culture and Education, 5(1), 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pangrazio, L. (2016). Reconceptualising critical digital literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(2), 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2011). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/1__p21_framework_2-pager.pdf

  • Peters, M., & Lankshear, C. (1996). Critical literacy and digital texts. Educational Theory, 46(1), 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poore, M. (2011). Digital literacy: Human flourishing and collective intelligence in a knowledge society. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 19(2), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinsloo, M., & Rowsell, J. (2012). Digital literacies as placed resources in the globalised periphery. Language and Education, 26(4), 271–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santo, R. (2013). Hacker literacies: User-generated resistance and reconfiguration of networked publics. In J. Avila & J. Z. Pandya (Eds.), Critical digital literacies as social praxis: Intersections and challenges. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2008). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I., & Prinsloo, M. (2007). Young people’s engagement with digital literacies in marginal contexts in a globalised world. Language and Education, 21(3), 171–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (2003). What’s “new” in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, S. L. (2013). Digital literacies. In M. Hawkins (Ed.), Framing languages and literacies: Socially situated views and perspectives (pp. 192–218). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warriner, D. S. (2007). Transnational literacies: Immigration, language learning, and identity. Linguistics and Education, 18(3), 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M. (2009). Digital literacy studies: Progress and prospects. In M. Baynham & M. Prinsloo (Eds.), The future of literacy studies (pp. 123–140). London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwend, K. E., & Lewis, C. (2011). Critical literacy, critical engagement, and digital technology: Convergence and embodiment in glocal spheres. In D. Lapp & D. Fisher (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (3rd ed., pp. 188–194). Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ron Darvin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Darvin, R. (2017). Language, Ideology, and Critical Digital Literacy. In: Thorne, S., May, S. (eds) Language, Education and Technology. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_35-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_35-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02328-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02328-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Language, Ideology, and Critical Digital Literacy
    Published:
    28 March 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_35-2

  2. Original

    Language, Ideology, and Critical Digital Literacy
    Published:
    15 February 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_35-1