Abstract
Collaborative practices have become very common in second language learning contexts. In particular, collaborative writing has received a significant amount of attention in recent years. This is largely due to the technological innovations that offer teachers and learners a wide variety of potential opportunities to experiment with collaborative practices. As these tools have evolved, approaches to collaborative pedagogy and practices have evolved alongside them. Thus, collaborative writing is in a constant state of change. This entry will provide an overview of the initial and major contributions that have established collaborative writing practices. These contributions include collaborative practices that have been documented in research studies as well as more pedagogically inclined writings. Following these initial contributions, readers will find an overview of the works in progress. These works include examples from across a variety of language learning contexts, including formal and informal settings. Many of the considerations evident in these current practices are a reflection of the problems and difficulties associated with collaborative writing practices. These challenges will be discussed. Future directions, which are largely informed by these challenges as well as future technological innovations and associated social practices, will be discussed as the conclusion to this entry.
References
Bado, N., & Franklin, T. (2014). Cooperative game-based learning in the English as a foreign language classroom. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 2(2), 1–17.
Bruner, J. S. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In A. Sinclair, R. J. Jarvella, & W. J. M. Levelt (Eds.), The child’s conception of language (pp. 241–256). New York: Springer.
Dobao, A. F. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 40–58.
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 51–71. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2010/elolaoskoz.pdf.
Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah: Erlebaum.
Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2005). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process and practice (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fortune, A. (2005). Learners’ use of metalanguage in collaborative form-focused L2 output tasks. Language Awareness, 14(1), 21–38.
Hansen, J. G., & Liu, J. (2005). Guiding principles for effective peer response. ELT Journal, 59(1), 31–38.
Hirvela, A. (1999). Collaborative writing: Instruction and communities of readers and writers. TESOL Journal, 8(2), 7–12.
Kessler, G. (2009). Student initiated attention to form in autonomous wiki based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 79–95. http://llt.msu.edu/vol13num1/kessler.pdf.
Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous language learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23, 41–58.
Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91–109.
Kost, C. (2011). Investigating writing strategies and revision behavior in collaborative wiki projects. CALICO Journal, 28(3), 606–620. Retrieved from http://media.proquest.com.ezproxy.aub.edu.lb/.
Kuhn, J. (2014). Writing across diverse CALL contexts. Invited Colloquium: Second language writing symposium, Arizona State University, Tempe.
Lee, L. (2008). Focus-on-form through collaborative scaffolding in expert-to-novice online interaction. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 53–72. Retrieved from: http://llt.msu.edu/vol12num3/lee.pdf.
Lund, A., & Rasmussen, I. (2008). The right tool for the wrong task? Match and mismatch between first and second stimulus in double stimulation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(4), 387–412.
Murray, D. E. (1992). Collaborative learning as literacy event: Implications for ESL instruction. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Collaborative language learning and teaching (pp. 100–117). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parks, S., Huot, D., Hamers, J., & Lemonnier, F. H. (2003). Crossing boundaries: Multimedia technology and pedagogical innovation in a high school class. Language Learning & Technology, 7(1), 28–45. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num1/parks/default.html.
Purcell, K., Buchanan, J., Friedrich, L. (2013). The impact of digital tools on student writing and how writing is taught in schools. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Teachers-technology-and-writing.
Shukor, S. S., & Noordin, N. (2014). Effects of Facebook collaborative writing groups on ESL undergraduates’ writing performance. International Journal of English Language Education, 2(2), 89–99.
Spigelman, C. (2000). Across property lines: Textual ownership in writing groups. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ interactions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153–173.
Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2013). Pairing learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 31–48.
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371–391.
Thorne, S. L. (2012). Gaming writing: Supervernaculars, stylization, and semiotic remediation. In G. Kessler, A. Oskoz, & I. Elola (Eds.), Technology across writing contexts and tasks (pp. 297–316). San Marcos: CALICO Monograph.
Thorne, S. L., Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2015). Technologies, identities, and expressive activity. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 215–233.
Torres, A. R., Ponce, E. P., & Pastor, M. D. G. (2012). Digital storytelling as a pedagogical tool within a didactic sequence in foreign language teaching. Digital Education Review, 22, 1–18.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weissberg, R. (2006). Connecting speaking and writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Zimmerman, L. W. (2010). ESL, EFL, and bilingual education: Exploring historical, sociolinguistical, linguistic, and instructional foundations. Charlotte: Information Age Pub.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Kessler, G. (2017). Second Language Writing, New Media, and Co-construction Pedagogies. In: Thorne, S., May, S. (eds) Language, Education and Technology. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_19-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_19-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02328-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02328-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Second Language Writing, New Media, and Co-construction Pedagogies- Published:
- 28 March 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_19-2
-
Original
Second Language Writing, New Media, and Co-construction Pedagogies- Published:
- 10 February 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_19-1