Skip to main content

Data-Driven Learning and Language Pedagogy

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Language, Education and Technology

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Language and Education ((ELE))

Abstract

Language corpora have many uses in language study, including for learners and other users of foreign languages in an approach that has come to be known as data-driven learning (DDL). This boils down to the learner’s ability to find answers to their questions by using software to access large collections of authentic texts relevant to their needs, as opposed to asking teachers or consulting ready-made reference materials. As such, not only do corpora contain the potential to answer many language questions, the consultation itself is likely to lead to improved language awareness and noticing. This chapter discusses the nature of corpora and their relevance in language learning, outlining the processes involved in DDL, and looks at the history and research development in the field from its beginnings to the present day, taking into account its limitations and gaps in our current knowledge with an eye to the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmad, K., Corbett, G., & Rogers, M. (1985). Using computers with advanced language learners: An example. The Language Teacher (Tokyo), 9(3), 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, R. (2006). Data-driven learning and vocabulary: Investigating the use of concordances with advanced learners of English, Centre for Language and Communication Studies Occasional Paper (Vol. 66). Dublin: Trinity College Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aston, G. (2015). Learning phraseology from speech corpora. In A. Leńko-Szymańska & A. Boulton (Eds.), Multiple affordances of language corpora for data-driven learning (pp. 65–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aston, G., & Burnard, L. (1998). The BNC handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroni, M., & Bernardini, S. (Eds.). (2006). Wacky! Working papers on the web as corpus. Bologna: Gedit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baten, L., Cornu, A.-M., & Engels, L. (1989). The use of concordances in vocabulary acquisition. In C. Laurent & M. Nordman (Eds.), Special language: From humans thinking to thinking machines (pp. 452–467). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, A. (2010). Data-driven learning: Taking the computer out of the equation. Language Learning, 60(3), 534–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, A. (2015). Applying data-driven learning to the web. In A. Leńko-Szymańska & A. Boulton (Eds.), Multiple affordances of language corpora for data-driven learning (pp. 267–295). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, A., & Cobb, T. (2017). Corpus use in language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 67(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, M. (2014). Getting the corpus habit: EAP students’ long-term use of personal corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 35(1), 30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chujo, K., & Oghigian, K. (2012). DDL for EFL beginners: A report on student gains and views on paper-based concordancing and the role of L1. In J. Thomas & A. Boulton (Eds.), Input, process and product: Developments in teaching and language corpora (pp. 170–183). Brno: Masaryk University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, T. (1997). From concord to lexicon: Development and test of a corpus-based lexical tutor. Unpublished PhD thesis. Montreal: Concordia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. (2009). The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990-2008+): Design, architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(2), 159–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberg-Garcia, A. (2014). The use of corpus examples for language comprehension and production. ReCALL, 26(2), 128–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geluso, J. (2013). Phraseology and frequency of occurrence on the web: Native speakers’ perceptions of Google-informed second language writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 144–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, T., & King, P. (Eds.). (1991). Classroom concordancing, English Language Research Journal (Vol. 4). Birmingham: Centre for English Language Studies, University of Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, T., Lee, H., & Wang, L. (2008). Integrating corpus-based CALL programs and teaching English through children’s literature. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 483–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C., & Miceli, T. (2010). Corpus-assisted creative writing: Introducing intermediate Italian learners to a corpus as a reference resource. Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), 28–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kučera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence: Brown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.-Y., & Liou, H.-C. (2003). A study of using web concordancing for English vocabulary learning in a Taiwanese high school context. English Teaching and Learning, 27(3), 35–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEnery, T., & Wilson, A. (1997). Teaching and language corpora. ReCALL, 9(1), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, S. (1980). Teaching the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic dimensions of verbs. TESOL Quarterly, 14(1), 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar, N. (2011). The processing of malformed formulaic language. Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, Í., & Chambers, A. (2006). Learners’ writing skills in French: Corpus consultation and learner evaluation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(1), 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Paredes, P., Sánchez-Tornel, M., & Alcaraz Calero, J. (2012). Learners’ search patterns during corpus-based focus-on-form activities: A study on hands-on concordancing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(4), 483–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quaglio, P. (2009). Television dialogue: The sitcom Friends vs. natural conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. (Ed.). (1987). Looking up: An account of the COBUILD project in lexical computing (pp. 104–115). London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. (Ed.). (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (2012). The mental corpus: How language is represented in the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J., & Boulton, A. (Eds.). (2012). Input, process and product: Developments in teaching and language corpora. Brno: Masaryk University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, R. (2001). Induction from self-selected concordances and self-correction. System, 29(1), 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2005). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, J., & Burston, J. (1998). Towards independent concordance work for students: Lessons from a case study. ON-CALL, 12(2), 10–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, H., & Hirvela, A. (2004). ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 257–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahar, R., Cobb, T., & Spada, N. (2001). Acquiring vocabulary through reading: Effects of frequency and contextual richness. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(3), 541–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Boulton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Boulton, A. (2017). Data-Driven Learning and Language Pedagogy. In: Thorne, S., May, S. (eds) Language, Education and Technology. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_15-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_15-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02328-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02328-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Data-Driven Learning and Language Pedagogy
    Published:
    28 March 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_15-2

  2. Original

    Data-Driven Learning and Language Pedagogy
    Published:
    13 February 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02328-1_15-1