Abstract
Despite the wide availability of telecare devices, the economic pressures, and the claimed benefits, the uptake of telecare services by older people is disappointingly limited. Much research is spent on finding out why the telecare acceptance is so much less than expected.
Ease of use, or rather lack of it – a seemingly likely cause – is difficult to assess since the traditional usability criteria do not apply well to the daily life of older people. Acceptance in the social environment plays an important role, sometimes in a positive sense, but mostly in a negative one; however, social environment is all but impossible to manipulate.
What does delay acceptance is the lack of standardization, which, in turn is also due to the fact that the impressive technological progress of the past decades has largely bypassed the field of assistive technology and health care. Another negative factor is cost. Though the price of devices has come down appreciably in recent years, system architecture and installation are getting more expensive and increased functionality goes hand in hand with higher cost. Next, during the actual running of telecare systems, successful operation has to compete with inherent difficulties of decision making in a noisy context. Making correct diagnoses is necessarily connected with false alarms, which may render the telecare system unusable. This is exacerbated by sources of unreliability in the system as a whole, like falling sensors, disconnected leads, empty batteries, and erased memories.
In the light of these difficulties, traditional Technology Acceptance Models (TAMs) are focusing on a very small part and then probably the wrong one of the whole complex multistage decision process in implementing a telecare system.
As it is, the comparatively immature state of telecare systems is up to now a multisectoral issue, in which stakeholders of different economic sectors operate mostly independently. Early stakeholders take decisions which later ones have to accept, up to the client as the end user, who also has to accept, but often does not. In a confusing situation like this, where the client is confronted with a system he or she has not chosen, it is doubtful that models based on a theory of rational behavior like the TAMs or Innovation Theory are valid at all.
What should be minimally done on the basis of these observations are three things.
First, an effective business case should be developed to run a telecare system – currently absent. Second, in addition to regulation, there should be a strong effort in the area of standardization. Finally, telecare should become a product that older people want, not one they have to accept.
References
Aberson DHA, Bouwhuis DG (1997) Silent reading as determined by age and visual acuity. J Res Read 20(3):184–204
Ach N (1905) Über die Willenstätigkeit und das Denken. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen
Ariely D (2008) Predictably irrational. HarperCollins Publishers, New York. ISBN 978-0-06-135324-6
Baker PW (2006) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stairlift
Beal GM, Rogers EM (1960) The adoption of two farm practices in a central Iowa community. Agricultural and Home Economics Experiment Station, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ames
Bourdieu P (2005) The social structures of the economy. Polity, Cambridge, UK. ISBN 978-0745625393
Darkins A, Ryan P, Kobb R, Foster L, Edmondson E, Wakefield B, Lancaster AE (2008) Care coordination/home telehealth: the systematic implementation of health informatics, home telehealth, and disease management to support the care of veteran patients with chronic conditions. Telemed e-Health 14:1118–1126
Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340
Docampo Rama M (2001) Technology generations handling complex user interfaces. Doctoral thesis submitted to the University of Technology, Eindhoven. ISBN 90-386-0913-2, NUGI 719
Ebeli P (2005) Domotics, usage comfort from luxury to necessity (in Dutch), Master’s thesis, Department of Technology Management, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven, 2005
Ehrlich D, Guttman I, Schönbach P, Mills J (1957) Post-decision exposure to relevant information. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 54(1):98–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042740
EHSA (1997) European home systems specification. Release 1.3, Zaventem (B): EHSA, March 1997
Eyck A (2004) Domotica in seriorenwoningen, (Domotics in seniors’ dwellings), Master’s thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Maastricht/Department of Technology Management, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven
Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Fortunati L (2013) The mobile phone between fashion and design. Mob Media Commun 1:102. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157912459497, http://mmc.sagepub.co/content/1/1/102
Friedman P, Wyatt JC (1997) Evaluation methods in medical informatics. Springer, New York, p 9
Hopp FP, Hogan MM, Woodbridge PA, Lowery JL (2007) The use of telehealth for diabetes management: a qualitative study of telehealth provider perceptions. Implement Sci 2:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-14
Ilardi V (2007) Renaissance vision, from spectacles to telescopes. The American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia. ISBN 978-0-87169-259-7
Internetprotocol (2013) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_address
ISO (1993) Guidance on specifying and measuring usability. ISO CD 9241, part 11: draft
Juhlin O, Zhang Y (2011) Unpacking social interaction that make us adore: on the aesthetics of mobile phones as fashion items. MobileHCI’11 Proceedings of the 13th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, pp 241–250. ISBN: 978-1-4503-0541-9, https://doi.org/10.1145/2037373.2037410
Kahneman D (2011) Thinking fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York. ISBN 978-0-374-27563-1
Mahoney DF (2010) An evidence-based adoption of technology model for remote monitoring of elders’ daily activities. Aging Int 36(1):66–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-010-9073-0
Melenhorst A-S (2002) Adopting communication technology in later life: the decisive role of benefits. Doctoral thesis submitted to the University of Technology, Eindhoven. ISBN 90-386-1867-0, NUR 810
MHRA (2013) http://www.mhra.gov.uk/Howweregulate/Devices/
Michl J (2009) E.H. Gombrich’s adoption of the formula form follows function: a case of mistaken identity? Hum Aff 19:274–288. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10023-009-0041-9
Norman DA (2004) Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York
Peterson WW, Birdsall TG, Fox WC (1954) The theory of signal detectability. Proc IRE Prof Group Inf Theory 4:171–212. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1954.1057460, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detection_theory
Rogers EM (1962) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, Glencoe. ISBN 0-612-62843-4
Rogers EM (1983) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York. ISBN 978-0-02-926650-2
Sawatzky B (2002) www.wheelchairnet.org/wcn_wcu/slidelectures/sawatzky/wc_history.html
Sponselee AAM (2013) Acceptance and effectiveness of telecare services from the end-user perspective: chapter 5 analysing telecare acceptance and use. PhD thesis submitted to the University of Technology, Eindhoven. ISBN 978-90-8891-643-4
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683. PMID 7455683
Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425–478
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Bouwhuis, D.G. (2021). A Framework for the Acceptance of Gerontechnology in Relation to Smart Living. In: van Hoof, J., Demiris, G., Wouters, E.J. (eds) Handbook of Smart Homes, Health Care and Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01904-8_3-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01904-8_3-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01904-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01904-8
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
A Framework for the Acceptance of Gerontechnology in Relation to Smart Living- Published:
- 26 February 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01904-8_3-2
-
Original
A Framework for the Acceptance of Gerontechnology in Relation to Smart Living- Published:
- 21 May 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01904-8_3-1