Skip to main content

Protein Design for Diversity of Sequences and Conformations Using Dead-End Elimination

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Therapeutic Proteins

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 899))

Abstract

Proteins, especially antibodies, are widely used as therapeutic and diagnostic agents. Computational ­protein design is a powerful tool for improving the affinity and stability of these molecules. We describe a protein design method which employs the dead-end elimination (DEE) and A* discrete search algorithms with a few improvements aimed at making the procedure more useful for actual projects to design proteins for better affinity or stability. DEE/A* and related algorithms allow vast search spaces of protein sequences and their alternative side chain conformations (“rotamers”) to be systematically explored, to find those with the best free energy of folding or binding. To maximize a protein design project’s chance of success, it needs to find a diverse set of sequences to experimentally synthesize. It should also find structures that score well, not only on the pairwise-additive energy function which DEE/A* and related search algorithms must use, but also on a post-search energy function with accurate treatment of solvation effects. Straight DEE/A*, however, typically finds vast numbers of very similar low-energy conformations, making it infeasible to find a diverse set of sequences or conformations. Herein, we describe a three-level DEE/A* procedure that uses DEE/A* at the level of sequences, at the level of rotamers, and at an intermediate “fleximer” level, to ensure a wide variety of sequences as well as a diverse set of conformations for each sequence.

A physics-based method is also described herein for calculating the free energy of folding based on a thermodynamic cycle with a model of the unfolded state. The free energies of both folding and binding may be used for the final evaluation of the designed structures. For example, when designing for improved affinity (binding), we can also ensure that stability is not degraded by screening on the free energy of folding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dunbrack RL Jr, Karplus M (1993) Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins: application to side-chain prediction. J Mol Biol 230:543–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Desmet J et al (1992) The dead-end elimination theorem and its use in protein side-chain positioning. Nature 356:539–542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldstein RF (1994) Efficient rotamer elimination applied to protein side-chains and related spin glasses. Biophys J 66:1335–1340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Winston PH (1992) Artificial intelligence. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leach AR, Lemon AP (1998) Exploring the conformational space of protein side chains using dead-end elimination and the A* algorithm. Protein Struct Funct Genet 33:227–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gordon DB, Mayo SL (1999) Branch-and-terminate: a combinatorial optimization algorithm for protein design. Structure 7:1089–1098

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Caravella JA (2002) Electrostatics and packing in biomolecules: accounting for conformational change in protein folding and binding. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, p. 112. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/16823

  8. Hanf KJM (2002) Protein design with hierarchical treatment of solvation and electrostatics. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, p. 143–165. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/29223

  9. Sharp KA, Honig BH (1990) Electrostatic interactions in macromolecules: theory and applications. Annu Rev Biophys Chem 19:301–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brooks BR et al (1983) CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 4:187–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. SHARPEN website. http://koko.che.caltech.edu/

  12. Loksha IV et al (2008) SHARPEN—systematic hierarchical algorithms for rotamers and proteins on an extended network. J Comput Chem 30:999–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. EGAD website. http://egad.berkeley.edu

  14. Pokala N, Handel TM (2005) Energy functions for protein design: adjustment with protein-protein complex affinities, models for the unfolded state, and negative design of solubility & specificity. J Mol Biol 347(1):203–227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. OSPREY website. http://www.cs.duke.edu/donaldlab/osprey.php

  16. Chen C et al (2009) Computational structure-based redesign of enzyme activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(10):3764–3769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. APBS website. http://www.poissonboltzmann.org

  18. Baker NA et al (2001) Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10037–10041

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee B, Richards FM (1971) The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol 55:379–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brünger AT, Karplus M (1988) Polar hydrogen positions in proteins: empirical energy placement and neutron diffraction comparison. Protein Struct Funct Genet 4:148–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mendes J et al (1999) Improved modeling of side-chains in proteins with rotamer-based methods: a flexible rotamer model. Protein Struct Funct Genet 37:530–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dahiyat BI, Mayo SL (1997) Probing the role of packing specificity in protein design. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:10172–10177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pierce NA et al (2000) Conformational splitting: a more powerful criterion for dead-end elimination. J Comput Chem 21(11):999–1009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gordon DB et al (2002) Exact rotamer optimization for protein design. J Comput Chem 24:232–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lasters I, Desmet J (1993) The fuzzy-end elimination theorem: correctly implementing the side chain placement algorithm based on the dead-end elimination theorem. Protein Eng 6:717–722

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gordon DB, Mayo SL (1998) Radical performance enhancements for combinatorial optimization algorithms based on the dead-end elimination theorem. J Comput Chem 19(13):1505–1514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sitkoff D, Sharp KA, Honig B (1994) Accurate calculation of hydration free energies using macroscopic solvent methods. J Phys Chem 98:1978–1988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl J. M. Hanf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Hanf, K.J.M. (2012). Protein Design for Diversity of Sequences and Conformations Using Dead-End Elimination. In: Voynov, V., Caravella, J. (eds) Therapeutic Proteins. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 899. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-921-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-921-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-920-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-921-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics