Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Financing Universities Through Vouchers: Lessons from the Republic of Georgia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An approach to state funding of universities that has attracted some attention in the literature is the funding of universities indirectly though state-funded student vouchers; vouchers would replace, or complement, direct budgetary allocations to individual universities. Proponents of this form of demand-side funding for higher education see it as a means of incorporating market mechanisms into public subsidies for universities; a central motivation is to promote both student choice and university competition, which, in turn, is expected to stimulate efficiency and quality of the university system as a whole. It is unclear how well such a system would perform because its adoption in practice has been rare and only minimal analyses of the few existing schemes have been executed. A voucher system for universities was introduced in the Republic of Georgia two decades ago. Exceptionally, a comprehensive administrative database, containing individual information on all students enrolled in the higher education system, was available. This has formed the basis for the review of the detailed working of this voucher scheme, and the lessons to be learned from it, which constitutes the focus of the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Chart 1
Chart 2

Source: Table 1.

Chart 3

Source: Table 1.

Chart 4

Source: Table 2.

Chart 5

Source: Table 5.

Chart 6

Source: Table 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chankseliani, M. (2013) ‘Rural disadvantage in georgian higher education admissions: A mixed-methods study’, Comparative Education Review 57(3): 424–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, B. (2004) ‘Adaption of a Voucher System in Government Funded Universities’, Delhi Business Review 5(1): 55–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohmen, D. (2000) Vouchers in Higher EducationA Practical Approach. Paper presented at the ECER 2000-Conference, Edinburgh, 20–23 September 2000. FiBS Furum No. 4. Cologne: Forschungsinstitut fur Bildungs und Sozialokonomie (FiBS)

  • Dobbins, M. and Khachatryan, S. (2015) ‘Europeanization in the ‘Wild East’? Analyzing higher education governance reform in Georgia and Armenia’, Higher Education 69(2): 189–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrat, N. (2012) Global Trends or Regime Survival: the Reforms in Russian Higher Education. Working Paper No. 12-001, CHSS Working Paper Series, the Roberta Buffett Center for International and Comparative Studies, Northwestern University, http://www.bcics.northwestern.edu/documents/workingpapers/CHSS-12-001-Forrat.pdf

  • Fox, K. (2006) Vouchers in Public Higher Education: The Colorado Approach to Funding and Access. Boulder: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1955) ‘The Role of Government in Education’, in Solo, R. A. (ed) Economics and the Public Interest, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, pp. 123–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962) Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. and Friedman, R.D. (1980) Free to Choose, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyneman, S. (2007) ‘Three Universities in Georgia, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan: The struggle against corruption and for social cohesion’, Prospects 37(3): 305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janashia, N. (2004) ‘Corruption in higher education in Georgia’, International Higher Education 34: 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. (2009) ‘Democrazy? Democracy through education reform in the Republic of Georgia’, Comparative and International Higher Education 3(2011): 15–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleshchukova, M. (2005) Merit Based Vouchers for Higher Education in Russia, Hedda Program: Institute for Educational Research, University of Oslo

  • Levy D. (2007) ‘Price Adjustment under the Table: Evidence on Efficiency-enhancing Corruption’, European Journal of Political Economy 23(2): 423–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltseva, E. (2013) ‘The challenges and prospects of reforming Russia’s higher education system’ in Black J. L. and Johns M. (eds). Russia after 2012: from Putin to Medvedev to Putincontinuity, change or revolution? London: Routledge, pp. 57–72

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2014) Education at a Glance 2014: OECD Indicators, Paris: OECD Publishing. 10.1787/eag-2014-en

    Google Scholar 

  • Osipian, A. (2009) ‘Vouchers, tests, loans, privatization: will they help tackle corruption in Russian higher education?’ Prospects 39(1): 47–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osipian, A. (2008) Introducing Vouchers and Standardized Tests for Higher Education in Russia: Expectations and Measurements, Munich Personnel RePEc Archive (MPRA) Paper No. 11059, http://mpra.ub.uni-muechen.de/11059

  • Parliament of Georgia (2005) Georgian Law on Higher Education, 2005, www.parliament.ge

  • Prescott, B. T. (2010) ‘Is Colorado’s voucher system worth vouching for ?;, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 42(4): 20–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmi, J. and A.M. Hauptman (2006) Innovations in Tertiary Education Financing: A Comparative Evaluation of Allocation Mechanisms, Education Working Paper Series No. 4. Washington, DC: World Bank

  • Tempus (2012) Higher Education in Georgia, Tbilisi: National Tempus Office

  • Vossensteyn H. and Jongbloed, B. (2007) Learning Entitlements in Higher EducationInternatioanl Practice and Experience with Learning Entitlements in Higher Education: Australia, Colorado, Germany and the Netherlands, Twente: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS), University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, A., Sparkes, J. and Balabanov, T. (2004) Demand-Side Financinga Focus on Vouchers in post-Compulsory Education and Training: Discussion and Case Studies. Thessaloniki: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP)

  • WICHE (2009) An Evaluation of Colorado’s College Opportunity Fund and Related Policies. A Report Prepared for the Colorado Department of Higher Education. Boulder: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziderman, A. and D. Albrecht (1995) Financing Universities in Developing Countries, Stanford Series on Education and Public Policy, London: Falmer Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziderman, A. and Andguladze, N. (2010) Reforming University Funding in Georgia: is Student-based Financing the Answer? Unpublished report submitted to UNESCO, May. Subsequently presented at the Third RESUP International Conference on Reforming Higher Education and Research, Paris, 27–29 January 2011

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian Ziderman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ziderman, A. Financing Universities Through Vouchers: Lessons from the Republic of Georgia. High Educ Policy 30, 161–184 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-016-0008-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-016-0008-6

Keywords

Navigation