Abstract
An approach to state funding of universities that has attracted some attention in the literature is the funding of universities indirectly though state-funded student vouchers; vouchers would replace, or complement, direct budgetary allocations to individual universities. Proponents of this form of demand-side funding for higher education see it as a means of incorporating market mechanisms into public subsidies for universities; a central motivation is to promote both student choice and university competition, which, in turn, is expected to stimulate efficiency and quality of the university system as a whole. It is unclear how well such a system would perform because its adoption in practice has been rare and only minimal analyses of the few existing schemes have been executed. A voucher system for universities was introduced in the Republic of Georgia two decades ago. Exceptionally, a comprehensive administrative database, containing individual information on all students enrolled in the higher education system, was available. This has formed the basis for the review of the detailed working of this voucher scheme, and the lessons to be learned from it, which constitutes the focus of the paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chankseliani, M. (2013) ‘Rural disadvantage in georgian higher education admissions: A mixed-methods study’, Comparative Education Review 57(3): 424–456
Cheung, B. (2004) ‘Adaption of a Voucher System in Government Funded Universities’, Delhi Business Review 5(1): 55–76
Dohmen, D. (2000) Vouchers in Higher Education — A Practical Approach. Paper presented at the ECER 2000-Conference, Edinburgh, 20–23 September 2000. FiBS Furum No. 4. Cologne: Forschungsinstitut fur Bildungs und Sozialokonomie (FiBS)
Dobbins, M. and Khachatryan, S. (2015) ‘Europeanization in the ‘Wild East’? Analyzing higher education governance reform in Georgia and Armenia’, Higher Education 69(2): 189–207
Forrat, N. (2012) Global Trends or Regime Survival: the Reforms in Russian Higher Education. Working Paper No. 12-001, CHSS Working Paper Series, the Roberta Buffett Center for International and Comparative Studies, Northwestern University, http://www.bcics.northwestern.edu/documents/workingpapers/CHSS-12-001-Forrat.pdf
Fox, K. (2006) Vouchers in Public Higher Education: The Colorado Approach to Funding and Access. Boulder: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE).
Friedman, M. (1955) ‘The Role of Government in Education’, in Solo, R. A. (ed) Economics and the Public Interest, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, pp. 123–144
Friedman, M. (1962) Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Friedman, M. and Friedman, R.D. (1980) Free to Choose, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
Heyneman, S. (2007) ‘Three Universities in Georgia, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan: The struggle against corruption and for social cohesion’, Prospects 37(3): 305–318
Janashia, N. (2004) ‘Corruption in higher education in Georgia’, International Higher Education 34: 1
Kim, S. (2009) ‘Democrazy? Democracy through education reform in the Republic of Georgia’, Comparative and International Higher Education 3(2011): 15–17
Kleshchukova, M. (2005) Merit Based Vouchers for Higher Education in Russia, Hedda Program: Institute for Educational Research, University of Oslo
Levy D. (2007) ‘Price Adjustment under the Table: Evidence on Efficiency-enhancing Corruption’, European Journal of Political Economy 23(2): 423–447
Maltseva, E. (2013) ‘The challenges and prospects of reforming Russia’s higher education system’ in Black J. L. and Johns M. (eds). Russia after 2012: from Putin to Medvedev to Putin — continuity, change or revolution? London: Routledge, pp. 57–72
OECD (2014) Education at a Glance 2014: OECD Indicators, Paris: OECD Publishing. 10.1787/eag-2014-en
Osipian, A. (2009) ‘Vouchers, tests, loans, privatization: will they help tackle corruption in Russian higher education?’ Prospects 39(1): 47–67
Osipian, A. (2008) Introducing Vouchers and Standardized Tests for Higher Education in Russia: Expectations and Measurements, Munich Personnel RePEc Archive (MPRA) Paper No. 11059, http://mpra.ub.uni-muechen.de/11059
Parliament of Georgia (2005) Georgian Law on Higher Education, 2005, www.parliament.ge
Prescott, B. T. (2010) ‘Is Colorado’s voucher system worth vouching for ?;, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 42(4): 20–26
Salmi, J. and A.M. Hauptman (2006) Innovations in Tertiary Education Financing: A Comparative Evaluation of Allocation Mechanisms, Education Working Paper Series No. 4. Washington, DC: World Bank
Tempus (2012) Higher Education in Georgia, Tbilisi: National Tempus Office
Vossensteyn H. and Jongbloed, B. (2007) Learning Entitlements in Higher Education — Internatioanl Practice and Experience with Learning Entitlements in Higher Education: Australia, Colorado, Germany and the Netherlands, Twente: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS), University of Twente.
West, A., Sparkes, J. and Balabanov, T. (2004) Demand-Side Financing — a Focus on Vouchers in post-Compulsory Education and Training: Discussion and Case Studies. Thessaloniki: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP)
WICHE (2009) An Evaluation of Colorado’s College Opportunity Fund and Related Policies. A Report Prepared for the Colorado Department of Higher Education. Boulder: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE)
Ziderman, A. and D. Albrecht (1995) Financing Universities in Developing Countries, Stanford Series on Education and Public Policy, London: Falmer Press
Ziderman, A. and Andguladze, N. (2010) Reforming University Funding in Georgia: is Student-based Financing the Answer? Unpublished report submitted to UNESCO, May. Subsequently presented at the Third RESUP International Conference on Reforming Higher Education and Research, Paris, 27–29 January 2011
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ziderman, A. Financing Universities Through Vouchers: Lessons from the Republic of Georgia. High Educ Policy 30, 161–184 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-016-0008-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-016-0008-6