Abstract
Suicide research has relied heavily on the psychological autopsy method, which uses interviews with the bereaved to ascertain the mental health status of the deceased prior to death. The resulting data are typically interpreted within a clinical diagnostic framework, which reinforces psychiatric assumptions concerning the ubiquity of mental illness amongst those who take their own lives. The ways in which informants reconstruct the past and the meanings they attach to events preceding the suicide are rarely examined. This paper uses qualitative methods to analyse the narratives given by bereaved people in an English psychological autopsy study, in order to understand how they made sense of a family member’s suicide. Some clear differences between the portrayal of male and female suicides emerged. The paper discusses the gendering of agency and accountability in relation to the differential medicalisation of male and female distress in the UK, and suggests that a preoccupation with mental illness in suicide research may have obscured other culturally normative understandings of self-accomplished death.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Exceptions might be publicly performed suicidal acts, such as cases of jumping in daylight from a public site, or recent cases in which individuals have filmed and broadcast their own deaths whilst participating in Internet forums.
This figure is slightly lower than other studies, but this may be accounted for by the fact that individuals who had been in contact with mental health services at the time of death were excluded.
Thirty-four tapes remained untranscribed for the following reasons: interview not taped at informants request (7); tape quality too poor (12); informant provided minimal narrative (9); informant was a medical professional (6).
In contemporary England, many coroners will avoid giving a verdict of suicide if at all possible, in order to spare the family the presumed stigma associated with it.
See Seale (1995) on the “transcendence of shame” in narratives given by relatives and friends of people who died alone.
We claim artistic license in employing the historically popular but now politically incorrect terms “madness” and “mad” to refer to mental illness or those suffering from it. Up until the late nineteenth century, the term madness was freely used in English to denote a condition characterised by abnormal thought and behaviour, being treated in lay parlance as equivalent in meaning to the legal term “insanity”. Its pedigree is reflected in the titles of such classic texts as Foucault’s Madness and Civilization (1971), Scull’s Museums of Madness (1979), and Porter’s Madness: A Brief History (2002). We use the terms in the same sense as these authors
We presented others in a previous paper, in which we focused specifically on the ways in which parents account for their sons’ suicides (Owens et al. 2008). We see no conflict between that analysis and this one; different sets of storylines represent different ways of viewing the data, attuning us in turn to different dimensions of the stories.
In referring to the deceased and their kin, we use pseudonyms throughout.
This is compared with 81% of the women.
The title of this section is a reference to a popular situation comedy on English television, although the stories presented here are far from comic. The TV show reinforces the idea that it is socially acceptable for men to indulge in varying degrees of anarchic behaviour, and that in doing so they are simply expressing their masculine identity.
A full discussion of the relationship between possession and madness is outside the scope of this paper. Historically and cross-culturally they have long been regarded as closely related. Whilst the possession states found in non-Western cultures have been widely regarded simply as culturally legitimated and institutionalised forms of mental illness (Lewis 1971), recent anthropological literature on spirit possession generally takes a culturally relativist stance (see Boddy 1994 for a survey of this field). Boddy’s conclusion that possession speaks to us “about morality, kinship, […] history and social memory—the touchstones of social existence” (1994, p. 427) is apposite in the context of this paper.
References
American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Barraclough, B, et al. (1974) A Hundred Cases of Suicide: Clinical Aspects. Br J Psychiatry 125:355-373.
Beskow, J, B Runeson, and U Asgard (1990) Psychological Autopsies: Methods and Ethics. Suicide Life Threat Behav 20(4):307-323.
Boddy, J (1994) Spirit possession revisited: Beyond instrumentality. Annual Review of Anthropology 21:407-34.
Burrows, K (2010) Warriors and survivors: Constructing the gendered cancer patient as hero. Intersections. Women’s and Gender Studies in Review across Disciplines 8:14-36.
Bury, M (2001) Illness narratives: fact or fiction? Sociology of Health & Illness 23(3):263-285.
Busfield, J (1983) Gender, mental illness and psychiatry. In Sexual Divisions: Patterns and Processes. M. Evans and C. Ungerson, eds. London: Tavistock.
Canetto, SS (1992) Gender and suicide in the elderly. Suicide Life Threat Behav 22(1):80-97.
Canetto, SS, and I Sakinofsky (1998) The gender paradox in suicide. Suicide Life Threat Behav 28(1):1-23.
Cavanagh, JTO, et al. (2003) Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic review Psychol Med 33:395-405.
Chesler, P (1972) Women and Madness. New York: Doubleday.
Connell, RW (2005) Masculinities. 2nd Edition Cambridge: Polity Press.
Conrad, P, and J W Schneider (1992) Deviance and Medicalization: From Badness to Sickness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Department of Health (2002) Tackling health inequalities. London: Department of Health.
Dorpat, T L, and H S Ripley (1960) A study of suicide in the Seattle area. Compr Psychiatry 1:349-359.
Foucault, M (1971) Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. London: Tavistock
Frank, A (1995) The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness and Ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Geertz, C (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Hawton, K, et al. (1998) The psychological autopsy approach to studying suicide: a review of methodological issues. J Affect Disord 50:269-276.
Hjelmeland, H (2010) Cultural Research in Suicidology: Challenges and Opportunities. Suicidology Online 1:34-52.
Holstein, JA, and JF Gubrium (2000) The Self We Live By: Narrative Identity in a Postmodern World. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hydén, L-C (1997) Illness and narrative. Sociology of Health & Illness 19(1):48-69.
Ingelby D (1982) The social construction of mental illness. In P Wright, A Treacher (eds) The Problem of Medical Knowledge: Examining the Social Construction of Medicine. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp 123-143
Isometsa, E T (2001) Psychological autopsy studies - a review. European Psychiatry 16:379-385.
Jones, GA, E Herrera, and ST de Benitez (2007) Tears, Trauma and Suicide: Everyday Violence among Street Youth in Puebla, Mexico. Bulletin of Latin American Research 26(4):462-479.
Jones, J (1962) On Aristotle and Greek Tragedy. London: Chatto & Windus.
Jordanova LJ (1981) Mental Illness, Mental Health: Changing Norms and Expectations. In: CWSS (ed) Women in Society. London: Virago, pp 95–114
Katz S (1997) Secular morality. In A. Brandt, P. Rozin (eds) Morality and Health. New York: Routledge, pp 297–330
Kelly, MP, and H Dickinson (2008) The narrative self in autobiographical accounts of illness. The Sociological Review 45(2):254-278.
Kittrie NN (1971) The Right to Be Different : Deviance and Enforced Therapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press
Lakoff, G, and M Johnson (1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago & London: Chicago University Press.
Lewis, IM (1971) Ecstatic religion : an anthropological study of spirit possession and shamanism. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Marsh, I (2010) Suicide: Foucault, History and Truth. Cambridge: University Press.
McAdams, DP (1993) The Stories We Live By: Personal Myths and the Making of the Self. New York & London: Guilford Press.
Murchison, J (2010) Ethnography essentials: Designing, conducting, and presenting your research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
O’Brien, R, K Hunt, and G Hunt (2005) ‘It’s caveman stuff, but that is to a certain extent how guys still operate’: men’s accounts of masculinity and help seeking. Soc Sci Med 61:503-516.
Oliver, MI, et al. (2005) Help-seeking behaviour in men and women with common mental health problems: cross-sectional study. Br J Psychiatry 186:297-301.
Owens, C, et al. (2003) Suicide outside the care of mental health services: a case-controlled psychological autopsy study. Crisis 24(3):113-121.
Owens, C, et al. (2008) Tales of biographical disintegration: how parents make sense of their sons’ suicides. Sociol Health Illn 30(2):237-254.
Owens, C, et al. (2009) Public involvement in suicide prevention: understanding and strengthening lay responses to distress. BMC Public Health 9:308.
Oxford English Dictionary 1989 Online Version December 2011. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/86302; Accessed 23 February 2012. Earlier version first published in New English Dictionary, 1898
Parsons, T (1951) The Social System. New York: The Free Press.
Pearson, V, and M Liu (2002) Ling’s Death: An Ethnography of a Chinese Woman’s Suicide. Suicide Life Threat Behav 32(4):347-358.
Pilgrim, D, and A Rogers (1999) A Sociology of Mental Health and Illness. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Pope, C, S Ziebland, and N Mays (2000) Analysing qualitative data. In Qualitative Research in Health Care. 2nd edition. C. Pope and N. Mays, eds. London: BMJ Publishing.
Porter, R (2002) Madness: A Brief History. Oxford: University Press.
Riessman, CK (1993) Narrative Analysis Newbury Park, Ca. & London: Sage
Romanucci-Ross L (1983) On madness, deviance, and culture. In L. Romanucci-Ross (ed) The Anthropology of Medicine. New York: Praeger, pp. 267-283.
Sanborn, D E, and C J Sanborn (1976) The psychological autopsy as a therapeutic tool. Dis Nerv Syst 37:4-7.
Scull, A (1979) Museums of Madness: The Social Organisation of Insanity in Nineteenth-century England. London: Allen Lane.
Seale, C (1995) Dying alone. Sociol Health Illn 17(3):376-392.
Seale, C (2002) Cancer Heroics: A Study of News Reports with Particular Reference to Gender. Sociology 36(1):107-126.
Shneidman, E S (1981) The psychological autopsy. Suicide Life Threat Behav 11(4):325-340.
Shorter, E (1997) A History of Psychiatry: From the Era of the Asylum to the Age of Prozac. Chichester: Wiley.
Showalter, E (1987) The Female Malady: Women, Madness and English Culture, 1830-1980. London: Virago.
Sontag, S (1991) Illness as Metaphor. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
World Health Organization (1992) The ICD-10 International Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Acknowledgments
Thanks are due to our colleagues Jenny Donovan and Keith Lloyd, who collaborated on the qualitative study and assisted with earlier stages of analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Owens, C., Lambert, H. Mad, Bad or Heroic? Gender, Identity and Accountability in Lay Portrayals of Suicide in Late Twentieth-Century England. Cult Med Psychiatry 36, 348–371 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-012-9259-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-012-9259-x