Skip to main content
Log in

Religiosity and Voluntary Simplicity: The Mediating Role of Spiritual Well-Being

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although there has been considerable theoretical support outlining a positive relationship between religiosity and voluntary simplicity, there is limited empirical evidence validating this relationship. This study examines the relationships among religious orientations (Allport and Ross in J Pers Soc Psychol 5(4):432–443, 1967) and voluntary simplicity in a sample of Australian consumers. The results demonstrate that intrinsic religiosity is positively related to voluntary simplicity; however, there is no relationship between extrinsic religiosity and voluntary simplicity. Furthermore, this research investigates the processes through which intrinsic religiosity affects voluntary simplicity. The relationship between intrinsic religiosity and voluntary simplicity is sequentially mediated by communal/personal well-being and environmental well-being. The findings not only identify a prosocial role of intrinsic religiosity in motivating voluntary simplicity, but also indicate that secular pursuits that enhance communal/personal well-being and environmental well-being may also motivate voluntary simplicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, A. M. (2009). Are religious people more prosocial? A quasi-experimental study with madrasah pupils in a rural community in India. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48(2), 368–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, (2005). Attitudes, personality and behavior (2nd ed.). Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2014). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Mahwah, NJ: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, S., & Ussher, S. (2012). The voluntary simplicity movement: A multi-national survey analysis in theoretical context. Journal of Consumer Culture, 12(1), 66–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, M. Y. (2016). An Islamic model of marketing ethics: A critical analysis from contemporary perspectives. In A. Jafari & O. Sandickci (Eds.), Islam, marketing and consumption: Critical perspectives on the intersection (pp. 141–155). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (ABS, 2014a). Australian Demographic Statistics, June 2014. Released: December 18, 2014.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (ABS, 2014b). Education and Work Australia, May 2014. Released: December 12, 2014.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (ABS, 2015). Household Income and Wealth, Australia, 20132014. Released: December 16, 2015.

  • Ballantine, P. W., & Creery, S. (2010). The consumption and disposition behavior of voluntary simplifiers. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 9(1), 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D., & Gray, R. A. (1981). Religious orientation and helping behavior: Responding to one’s own or the victims’ needs? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(3), 511–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, R. (2008). Intangible value in buyer-seller relationships. In A. G. Woodside, F. Golfetto, & M. Gibbert (Eds.), Creating and managing superior customer value (pp. 27–98). Bingley: Emerald Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News. (December 25, 2015). Pope Francis in his Christmas homily denounces materialism. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35178228.

  • Belk, R. W. (1983). Worldly possessions: Issues and criticisms. In R. P. Bagozzi & A. M. Tybout (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 10, pp. 514–519). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenguer, J. (2010). The effect of empathy in environmental moral reasoning. Environment and Behavior, 42(1), 110–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, R., & Mosteller, R. (2008, May 18). Voluntary simplicity movement re-emerges. New York Times.

  • Bove, L. L., Nagpal, A., & Dorsett, A. D. S. (2009). Exploring the determinants of the frugal shopper. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(4), 291–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, G. C. (2014). Scale-related pet peeves: Don’t use reverse-coded items in scales. Retrieved July 31, 2014, from http://scaleresearch.siu.edu/petpeeve5.html.

  • Burroughs, J. E., Chaplin, L. N., Pandelaere, M., Norton, M. I., Ordabayeva, N., Gunz, A., et al. (2013). Using motivation theory to develop a transformative consumer research agenda for reducing materialism in society. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 32(1), 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, K. R., Hageman, A., & Isle, D. B. (2007). Intrinsic motivation and subjective well-being: The unique contribution of intrinsic religious motivation. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17(2), 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, K., & Zika, S. (1988). Religiosity, life meaning and well-being: Some relationships in a sample of women. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 27(3), 411–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chau, L. L., Johnson, R. C., Bowers, J. K., Darvill, T. J., & Danko, G. P. (1990). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity as related to conscience, adjustment, and altruism. Personality and Individual Differences, 11(4), 397–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., & Tang, T. L. (2013). The bright and dark sides of religiosity among university students: Do gender, college major, and income matter? Journal of Business Ethics, 115(3), 531–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherrier, H. (2007). Ethical consumption practices: Co-production of self-expression and social recognition. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 6(5), 321–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, R. M. M. I. (2015). Emotional intelligence and consumer ethics: The mediating role of personal moral philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2733-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, R. M. M. I., & Fernando, M. (2013). The role of spiritual well-being and materialism in determining consumers’ ethical beliefs: An empirical study with Australian consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(1), 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig-Lees, M., & Hill, C. (2002). Understanding voluntary simplifiers. Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), 187–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daoud, A. (2011). The modus vivendi of material simplicity: Countering scarcity via the deflation of wants. Review of Social Economy, 69(3), 275–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, E. (1998). “The earth is the Lord’s and the fullness thereof”: Jewish perspectives on consumption. In D. A. Crocker & T. Linden (Eds.), Ethics of consumption (pp. 391–402). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollahite, D. C. (1998). Fathering, faith and spirituality. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 7(1), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donahue, M. J. (1985). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 400–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgin, D. (1993). Voluntary simplicity: Toward a life that is outwardly simple, Inwardly rich. New York: Quill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgin, D., & Mitchell, A. (1977). Voluntary simplicity. The Co-evolution Quarterly, 3(Summer), 4–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A. (1999). Religion in the psychology of personality: An introduction. Journal of Personality, 67(6), 874–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1998). Voluntary simplicity: Characterization, select psychological implications, and societal consequences. Journal of Economic Psychology, 19(5), 619–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, M., & Chowdhury, R. M. M. I. (2010). The relationship between spiritual well-being and ethical orientations in decision making: An empirical study with business executives in Australia. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 211–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, R. J. (1999). The discipline of simplicity. In M. Schut (Ed.), Simpler living, compassionate life: A Christian perspective (pp. 180–190). New York: Morehouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, H. H. (2002). The simple life: The case against ostentation in Jewish Law. Retrieved from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2294784.

  • Friedman, H. H. (2011, June). Voluntary simplicity and the Torah life. The Jewish Magazine. http://www.jewishmag.com/155mag/torah_financial_guidelines/torah_financial_guidelines.htm.

  • Galen, L. W. (2012). Does religious belief promote prosociality? A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 876–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, E. S. (1995). Actively caring for the environment: An integration of behaviourism and humanism. Environment and Behavior, 27(2), 184–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genia, V. (1996). I, E, quest, and fundamentalism as predictors of psychological and spiritual well-being. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35(1), 56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, R., & Fisher, J. W. (2003). Domains of spiritual well-being and development and validation of the spiritual well-being questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(8), 1975–1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, R., & Fisher, J. W. (2005). Item response theory analysis of the spiritual well-being questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(5), 1107–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 140–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, R. (1936). Voluntary simplicity. Visva-Bharati Quarterly, reprinted in Manas (September 4, 1974).

  • Guth, J. L., Green, J. C., Kellstedt, L. A., & Smidt, C. E. (1995). Faith and the environment: Religious beliefs and attitudes on environmental policy. American Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 364–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. (2003). Downshifting in UK: A sea-change in the pursuit of happiness. Discussion Paper No. 58, Canberra: The Australia Institute.

  • Hamilton, C., & Mail, E. (2003). Downshifting in Australia: A sea-change in the pursuit of happiness. Discussion Paper No. 50, Canberra: The Australia Institute.

  • Hand, C. M., & Van Liere, K. D. (1984). Religion, mastery-over-nature, and environmental concern. Social Forces, 63(2), 555–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, D. E., Vandenberg, B., & Patterson, M. L. (1995). The effects of religious orientation on spontaneous and nonspontaneous helping behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(1), 101–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haski-Leventhal, D. (2009). Altruism and volunteerism: The perceptions of altruism in four disciplines and their impact on the study of volunteerism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 39(3), 271–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henningsgaard, J. M., & Arnau, R. C. (2008). Relationships between religiosity, spirituality, and personality: A multivariate analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(8), 703–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R. W., Jr., Morris, R. J., & Watson, P. J. (1986). Maintenance of religious fundamentalism. Psychological Reports, 59(2), 547–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huneke, M. E. (2005). The face of the un-consumer: An empirical examination of the practice of voluntary simplicity in the United States. Psychology & Marketing, 22(7), 527–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, O. (1999). Perceptual and behavioral correlates of voluntary simplicity lifestyles. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 27(4), 379–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, O. (2006). An evaluation of consumerism and lifestyle as correlates of a voluntary simplicity lifestyle. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 34(5), 557–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, R., & Muncy, J. A. (2009). Purpose and object of anti-consumption. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 160–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafari, A., & Suerdem, A. (2012). An analysis of material consumption culture in the Muslim world. Marketing Theory, 12(1), 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. C., Danko, G. P., Darvill, T. J., Bochner, S., Bowers, J. K., Huang, Y., et al. (1989). Cross cultural assessment of altruism and its correlates. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(8), 855–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanagy, C. L., & Nelson, H. M. (1995). Religion and environmental concern: Challenging the dominant assumptions. Review of Religious Research, 37(1), 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T., & Ahuvia, A. (2002). Materialistic values and well-being in business students. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(1), 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaynak, R., & Eksi, S. (2011). Ethnocentrism, religiosity, environmental and health consciousness: Motivators for anti-consumers. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 4(8), 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaza, S. (2010). How much is enough? Buddhist perspectives on consumerism. In R. K. Payne (Ed.), How much is enough? Buddhism, Consumerism, and the human environment (pp. 39–61). Sommerville, MA: Wisdom Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, E. H., Krahn, H., & Krogman, N. T. (2013). Downshifting: An exploration of motivations, quality of life, and environmental practices. Sociological Forum, 28(4), 764–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, F. (2011). Islamic economics. In L. Bouckaert & L. Zsolnai (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of spirituality and business (pp. 138–146). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne, W. E., & Pickett, G. (2008). How materialism affects environmental beliefs, concern, and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Business Research, 61(9), 885–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1993). Fundamentalism, Christian orthodoxy, and intrinsic religious orientation as predictors of discriminatory attitudes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 32(3), 256–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laczniak, G. R., & Murphy, P. E. (2012). Stakeholder theory and Marketing: Moving from a firm centric to a societal perspective. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 31(2), 284–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, N. M., Fincham, F. D., Stillman, T. F., & Dean, L. R. (2009). More gratitude, less materialism: The mediating role of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(1), 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lastovicka, J. L., Bettencourt, L. A., Hughner, R. S., & Kuntze, R. J. (1999). Lifestyle of the tight and frugal: Theory and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. A., & Holden, S. J. S. (1999). Understanding the determinants of environmentally conscious behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 16(5), 373–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1981). Voluntary simplicity lifestyles and energy conversation. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(3), 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieflander, A. K., Frohlich, G., Bogner, F. X., & Schultz, P. W. (2013). Promoting connectedness with nature through environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 19(3), 370–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. P., Chen, S. C., Chiu, C. K., & Lee, W. Y. (2013). Understanding purchase intention during product-harm crises: Moderating effects of perceived corporate ability and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(3), 455–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, J. B. (2015, May 21). Patagonia’s anti-growth strategy. The New Yorker.

  • Maiteny, P. T. (2002). Mind in the gap: Summary of research exploring ‘inner’ influences on pro sustainability learning and behavior. Environment Education Research, 8(3), 299–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, H. (2015, November 17). REI closing on Black Friday for 1st time in push to #OptOutside. USA Today.

  • Markstrom, C. A., Huey, E., Stiles, B. M., & Krause, A. L. (2010). Frameworks of caring and helping in adolescence: Are empathy, religiosity, and spirituality related constructs? Youth & Society, 42(1), 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, W. C., & Bateman, C. R. (2014). Consumer religious commitment’s influence on ecocentric attitudes and behavior. Journal of Business Research, 67(2), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazereeuw-van der Duijn Schouten, C., Graafland, J., & Kaptein, M. (2014). Religiosity, CSR attitudes, and CSR behavior: An empirical study of executives’ religiosity and CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(3), 437–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S., Oates, C. J., Young, C. W., & Hwang, K. (2006). Toward sustainable consumption: Researching voluntary simplifiers. Psychology & Marketing, 23(6), 515–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, L. P., Frendle, A. M., & Gentry, J. W. (2013). The simple man: The consumption behavior of the principled life. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 12(1), 70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKibben, B. (1998). Returning God to the center: Consumerism & the environmental threat. In R. Clapp (Ed.), The consuming passion (pp. 40–50). Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, S., & Stutzer, A. (2008). Is volunteering rewarding in itself? Economica, 75(297), 39–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, D., Hayashi, Y., Stokes, M., Firth, L., Lake, L., Staples, M., et al. (2009). Volunteering and its relationship with personal and neighbourhood well-being. Non Profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(1), 144–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milfont, T. L. (2009). The effects of social desirability on self-reported environmental attitudes and ecological behavior. Environmentalist, 29(3), 263–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S., & Gregan-Paxton, J. (2006). Community and connectivity: Examining the motives underlying the adoption of a lifestyle of voluntary simplicity. In C. Pechmann & L. L. Price (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 33, pp. 289–290). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. T., Jr., & Spoolman, S. E. (2009). Living in the environment: Principles, connections, and solutions. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minton, E. A., Kahle, L. R., & Kim, C. (2015). Religion and motives for sustainable behaviors: A cross-cultural comparison and contrast. Journal of Business Research, 68(9), 1937–1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I., & Denton, E. A. (1999). A study of spirituality in the workplace. MIT Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberg, D. O. (1979). The development of social indicators for quality of life research. Sociology of Religion, 40(1), 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. G. (2012). Reflections of religious belief and prosociality: Comment on Galen (2012). Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 913–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan, V. (1997). “One tree is equal to ten sons”: Hindu responses to the problems of ecology, population, and consumption. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 65(2), 291–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and complications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noguti, V., & Bokeyar, A. L. (2014). Who am I? The relationship between self-concept uncertainty and materialism. International Journal of Psychology, 49(5), 323–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norenzayan, A., & Shariff, A. F. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322, 58–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrow, R. (2014, August 9). The wisdom of downsizing to voluntary simplicity. The Australian.

  • Pace, S. (2013). Does religion affect the materialism of consumers? An empirical investigation of Buddhist ethics and the resistance of the self. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, J. H., & Kinney, J. M. (2003). Why believe? The effects of religious beliefs on emotional well-being. Journal of Religious Gerontology, 14(2–3), 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patwardhan, A. M., Keith, M. E., & Vitell, S. J. (2012). Religiosity, attitude toward business, and ethical beliefs: Hispanic consumers in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(1), 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pava, M. L. (2011). Jewish ethical perspective on income and wealth distribution. In L. Bouckaert & L. Zsolnai (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of spirituality and business (pp. 111–117). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, M., Jackson, T., & Uzzell, D. (2010). An examination of Christianity and socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 20(10), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, L. R., & Roy, A. (1985). Religiosity, anxiety, and meaning and purpose: Religion’s consequences for psychological well-being. Review of Religious Research, 27(1), 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfattheicher, S., Sassenrath, C., & Schindler, S. (2016). Feelings for the suffering of others and the environment: Compassion fosters pro-environmental tendencies. Environment and Behavior, 48(7), 929–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D., & Campbell, D. E. (2010). American grace: How religion divides and unites us. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regnerus, M. D., Smith, C., & Sikkink, D. (1998). Who gives to the poor? The influence of religious tradition and political location on the personal generosity of Americans toward the poor. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37(3), 481–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, G. (2006). Pro-environmental behavior in Egypt: Is there a role for Islamic environmental ethics? Journal of Business Ethics, 65(4), 373–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. A., & Clement, A. (2007). Materialism and satisfaction with over-all quality of life and eight life domains. Social Indicators Research, 82(1), 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudmin, F. W., & Kilbourne, W. E. (1996). The meaning and morality of voluntary simplicity. In R. Belk, N. Dholakia, & A. Venkatesh (Eds.), Consumption and marketing: Macro dimensions (pp. 166–215). Cincinnati, OH: South Western College Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, A. A. (1979). Percept and practice of human rights in Islam. Universal Human Rights, 1(1), 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvador, R. O., Merchant, A., & Alexander, E. A. (2014). Faith and fair trade: The moderating role of contextual religious salience. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(3), 353–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saroglou, V. (2013). Religion, spirituality, and altruism. In K. I. Pargament (Ed.), APA Handbook of Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality, Vol. 1: Context, Theory, and Research (pp. 439–457). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Saroglou, V., Delpierre, V., & Dernelle, R. (2004). Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz’s model. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(4), 721–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saroglou, V., Pichon, I., Trompette, L., Verschueren, M., & Dernelle, R. (2005). Prosocial behavior and religion: New evidence based on projective measures and peer ratings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44(3), 323–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, H., Krieger, J., & Bayraktar, A. (2011). The impact of intrinsic religiosity on consumers’ ethical beliefs: Does it depend on the type of religion? A comparison of Christian and Moslem consumers in Germany and Turkey. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 319–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor, J. (1998). The overspent Americans: Why we want what we don’t need. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. F. (1974). Small is beautiful: A study of economics as if people mattered. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Huismans, S. (1995). Value priorities and religiosity in four western religions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(2), 88–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shama, A. (1985). The voluntary simplicity consumer. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2(4), 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shama, A., & Wisenblit, J. (1984). Values of voluntary simplicity: Lifestyle and motivation. Psychological Reports, 55(1), 231–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., & Newholm, T. (2002). Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), 167–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherkat, D. E., & Ellison, C. G. (2007). Structuring the religion-environment connection: Identifying religious influences on environmental concern and activism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46(1), 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J. N., Sethia, N. K., & Srinivas, S. (2011). Mindful consumption: A customer-centric approach to sustainability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, M. (2012, July 9). Seeking a simple life. The Sydney Morning Herald.

  • Stavrova, O., & Siegers, P. (2014). Religious prosociality and morality across cultures: How social enforcement of religion shapes the effects of personal religiosity on prosocial and moral attitudes and behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(3), 315–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, P. R., & Masters, K. S. (2005). Does compassion mediate the intrinsic religion-health relationship? Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 30(3), 217–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stillman, T. F., Fincham, F. D., Vohs, K. D., Lambert, N. M., & Phillips, C. A. (2012). The material and immaterial in conflict: Spirituality reduces conspicuous consumption. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoits, P. A., & Hewitt, L. N. (2001). Volunteer work and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42(2), 115–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulusoy, E. (2015). The role of religion in anti-consumption tendencies: Religiosity as a different form of consumer resistance. In L. Robinson Jr. (Ed.), Marketing dynamism & sustainability: Things change, things stay the same. Proceedings of the 2012 academy of marketing science annual conference (pp. 51–53). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varul, M. Z. (2008). After heroism: Religion versus consumerism. Preliminaries for an investigation of Protestantism and Islam under consumer culture. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 19(2), 237–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J. (2009). The role of religiosity in business and consumer ethics: A review of the literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 155–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., Paolillo, J. G. P., & Singh, J. J. (2005). Religiosity and consumer ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(2), 175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., Paolillo, J. G. P., & Singh, J. J. (2006). The role of money and religiosity in determining consumers’ ethical beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(2), 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., Singh, J. J., & Paolillo, J. G. P. (2007). Consumers’ ethical beliefs: The roles of money, religiosity and attitude toward business. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(4), 369–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, P. J., Morris, R. J., Hood, R. W., Milliron, J. T., & Stutz, N. L. (1998). Religious orientation, identity, and the quest for meaning in ethics within an ideological surround. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 8(3), 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weijters, B., & Baumgartner, H. (2012). Misresponse to reversed and negated items in surveys: A review. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(5), 737–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L., Jr. (1967). The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science, 155, 1203–1207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsh, L., & O’Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro- environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro- environmental behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 305–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolkomir, M., Futreal, M., Woodrum, E., & Hoban, T. (1997). Substantive religious belief and environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly, 78(1), 96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavestoski, S. (2002). The social-psychological bases of anticonsumption attitudes. Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), 149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinnbauer, B. J., Pargament, K. I., Cole, B., Rye, M. S., Butter, E. M., Belavich, T. G., et al. (1997). Religion and spirituality: Unfuzzing the fuzzy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36(4), 549–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zsolnai, L. (2011). Buddhist economics. In L. Bouckaert & L. Zsolnai (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of spirituality and business (pp. 88–94). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafi M. M. I. Chowdhury.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 11.

Table 11 Scales for intrinsic religiosity and extrinsic religiosity (based on Allport and Ross 1967; modified by Vitell et al. 2005)

Appendix 2

See Table 12.

Table 12 Scales for different domains of spiritual well-being (based on Gomez and Fisher 2003)

Appendix 3

See Table 13.

Table 13 Scale for voluntary simplicity (modified from Iyer and Muncy 2009)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chowdhury, R.M.M.I. Religiosity and Voluntary Simplicity: The Mediating Role of Spiritual Well-Being. J Bus Ethics 152, 149–174 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3305-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3305-5

Keywords

Navigation