Skip to main content
Log in

Contribution of the Management System and the Institutional Framework to the Efficiency of Values-Based Management

Case of the Tunisian Food Processing Industry

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present research is an attempt to determine the contribution of the management system and the institutional framework to the efficiency of values-based management (VBM). The interest in the question of efficiency stems from the fact that to grasp this founding principle of management is essential for any effort of evaluation and valuation accompanying the adoption of any type of management. Our choice of an organizational variable as well as an environmental one to explain the phenomenon of efficiency, intends to cover sources of influence, both internal and external to the organization. As such, this study addresses the following question: What is the effect of the management system and the institutional framework on the efficiency of values-based management? The main theoretical and empirical results reveal that these two variables contribute jointly to the efficiency of VBM. More precisely, the empirical results obtained, in particular through the canonical correlation analysis, specify that both variables influence the efficiency of VBM in different degrees, with the effect of the management system being superior. The latter explains the efficiency of the management by the values at a rate of 52.59 %, whereas the institutional framework explains it only up to 25.15 %.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. In this paper, we will use values-based management, management by values, approach based on values as equivalent.

  2. This concept was introduced in French ‘A-responsabilité’ by Solé (1997). The writer notes that a person in charge of a company is not spontaneously and naturally responsible. However, it is not irresponsible. He is basically ‘a-responsible’ as he is realistic (Solé 1997, p. 13).

Abbreviations

VBM:

Values-based management

EVBM:

Efficiency of values-based management

MS:

Management system

IF:

Institutional framework

FACMO:

Factor mobilization

FACOP:

Factor opportunity of use

FACDC:

Factor differential contribution

FACETH:

Factor ethics

FACMF:

Factor mode of functioning

FACPR:

Factor procedure of regulation

FACCL:

Factor context legal

FACSR:

Factor sociological referential

FACMA:

Factor market

References

  • Abbott, G. N., White, F. A., & Charles, M. A. (2005). Linking values and organizational commitment: A correlation and experimental investigation in two organizations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(4), 531–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. (1938). The function of the executive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrette, R. (2003). Libérer l’âme de l’entreprise : Bâtir une organisation visionnaire guidée par les valeurs. Belgique: De Boeck Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biefnot, Y., & Pesqueux, Y. (2002). L’éthique des affaires, management par les valeurs et responsabilité sociale. Paris: Editions d’Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc, J. (2005). De l’efficacité des démarches volontaires des entreprise pour diffuser des valeurs nouvelles. La revue des sciences de gestion, 211–212, 97–109.

  • Blanchard, K., & O’Connor, M. (1997). Managing by values: How to put your values into action for extraordinary results. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchko, A. A. (2007). Managing by values and the leadership effect: An empirical assessment. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 28(1), 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carracino, M., & Poujol, F. (2008). Analyse des données avec SPSS. Paris: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, C. (2006). Canonical correlation analysis: Assessing links between multiplex networks. Social Networks, 28, 310–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claude, J. F. (2003). Le management par les valeurs. Paris: Editions Liaisons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (1991). Organizational vision and visionary organizations. California Management Review, 34(1), 30–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, C., & Verschoor, C. (2005). Is there Financial value in corporate values? Strategic Finance, 87(1), 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delhoustal, B. (2006). Promouvoir l’éthique professionnelle : l’art de manager par les valeurs. Papier de recherche de l’école de management de Nancy.

  • Dolan, L., & El Alaoui, M. (2010). Comment créer des organisations éthiques ? Vers une nouvelle perspective : la gestion par les valeurs. In Éthique et Responsabilité, Questions de Sociétés (pp. 273–280). Cormelles-le-Royal: Editions EMS.

  • Dolan, L., & Garcia, S. (1999). La gestion par les valeurs. Montréal: Editions Nouvelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, L., & Garcia, S. (2002). Managing by values: Cultural redesign for strategic organizational change at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Journal of Management Development, 21(2), 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, L., Garcia, S., & Auerbach, A. (2003). Understanding and managing chaos in organisations. International Journal of Management, 20(1), 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, L., & Richely, A. (2006). Management by values: A new philosophy for a new economic order. In P. Coats (Ed.), Handbook of business strategy (Vol. 7(1), pp. 235–238). London: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doly, J. P., & Monconduit, F. (1995). L’entreprise entre contrainte et liberté. Paris: Editions l’harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnadieu, D. (1993). L’intégration sociale dans les organisations. Actes du deuxième congrès européen de systémique (pp. 1–9). Rome: Edizioni Kappa.

  • Drucker, P. (2000). L’avenir du mangement. Paris: Village Mondial Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebener, D. (2005). The values-driven organization: A model for not-for-profit strategic management (pp. 1–18). Davenport Iowa: St Ambrose University.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Akremi, A. (2005). Analyse des variables modératrices et médiatrices par les méthodes d’équations structurelles. In P. Roussel & F. Wacheux (Eds.), Management des ressources Humaines: Méthodes de recherche en sciences humaines et sociales (1st ed.). Bruxelles: De Boeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evrard, Y., Pras, B., Roux, E., Choffray, J. M., & Dussaix, A. M. (1997). Market : études et recherches en marketing. Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frioui, M. (2006). Le cadre institutionnel et la problématique managériale. Tunis: Yamama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grojean, M. W., Resick, C. J., Dickson, M. W., & Smith, B. D. (2004). Leaders, values, and organizational climate: Examining leadership strategies for establishing an organizational climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(3), 223–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, E. M. (1996). Organizational ethics and the good life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harung, H. S., & Dahl, T. (1995). Increased productivity and quality through management by values: A case study of Manpower Scandinavia. The Total Quality Management Magazine, 7(2), 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaakson, K. (2010). Management by values: Are some values better than other. Journal of Management Development, 29(9), 795–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaakson, K., Reino, A., & Vadi, M. (2004). Organisational values in the framework of critical incidents: What accounts for values-based solutions. Economics and Business Administration. University of Tartu.

  • Loosdregt, H. B. (2004). Prévenir les risques éthiques de votre entreprise. Paris: INSEP Consulting Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majer, K. (2005). Values-based leadership: a revolutionary approach to business success and personnel prosperity. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 10(1), 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meglino, B. M., & Ravlin, E. C. (1998). Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of Management, 24(3), 351–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, N., & Ould Aoudia, J. (2007). Une nouvelle base de données institutionnelles : profils institutionnels 2006. Les Cahiers de la DGTPE, 9, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, S. (2001). L’instrumentalisation des valeurs: une ressource stratégique pour l’entreprise ? La démarche du groupe Fournier. Revue Internationale de Gestion, 26(2), 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, A. E., & Spencer, E. M. (2005). Values based decision-making: A tool for achieving the goals of healthcare. HEC Forum, 17(1), 18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nifle, R. (2006). Quelles sont donc nos valeurs? Journal Permanant de l’Humanisme Méthodologique (on ligne). www.journal.coherences.com.

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padaki, V. (2002). Making the organization learn: Demystification and management action. Development in Practice, 12(3&4), 324–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, P. (2003). La performance durable. Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruzan, P. (1998). From control to values-based management and accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(13), 1379–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruzan, P. (2001). The question of organizational consciousness: Can organizations have values, virtues and visions? Journal of Business Ethics, 29(3), 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rallet, A. (1995). Libéralisation de l’économie, problématique de développement régional et routines institutionnelles : le cas de la Tunisie. Revue Région et Développement, 2, 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, A. (2003). Responsabilité sociale et éthique de l’entreprise : double face d’un même mouvement (pp. 1–7). L’économie politique No. 18, deuxième semestre.

  • Shein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. R. (1991). The institutionalization of organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(7), 493–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solé, A. (1997). À propos de l’A-responsabilité du dirigeant d’entreprise. In Revue ethique des affaires (pp. 13–31). Paris: Editions Eska.

  • Solomon, R. C. (2004). Aristotle, ethics and business organizations. Organizational Studies, 25(6), 1021–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephany, D. (2003). Développement durable et performance de l’entreprise. Paris: Éditions Liaisons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabatoni, P., & Jarniou, P. (1975). Les systèmes de gestion : politiques et structures. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thévenet, M. (1999). La culture d’entreprise. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiétart, R. A., et al. (2003). Méthodes de recherche en management. Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viinamaki, O. P. (2009). Intra-organizational challenges of values-based leadership. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 14(2), 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellhoff, T. (2009). Les valeurs: donner du sens, guider la communication. Paris: Editions d’organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D. A., & Godfrey, P. C. (1998). Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations, Foundations for organizational science. London: A Sage Publication Series.

  • Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organization: A normative view. Academy of Management, 7(3), 418–428.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wafa Ben Ahmed Naouar.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

 

Decisions rules and thresholds acceptability

References

KMO index

KMO > 0.6

Carracino and Poujol (2008)

Bartlett test

<10−3

Carracino and Poujol (2008)

Rotation

Varimax

Carracino and Poujol (2008)

Extraction factor criteria

Minimum of variance >60 %

Thiétart et al. (2003),

Carracino and Poujol (2008),

Hair et al. (1998)

Eigenvalue >1

El Akremi (2005),

Carracino and Poujol (2008),

Evrard et al. (1997)

Axes explained by a single factor will not be considered

Carracino and Poujol (2008)

Purification criteria items

Factor contribution >0.5 on a factor and <0.3 on other factors extracted

Communalités >0.5

Carracino and Poujol (2008),

Evrard et al. (1997),

El Akremi (2005)

Calculation of α of Cronbach for each dimension after purification

El Akremi (2005),

Carracino and Poujol (2008)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naouar, W.B.A. Contribution of the Management System and the Institutional Framework to the Efficiency of Values-Based Management. J Bus Ethics 135, 787–796 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2503-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2503-2

Keywords

Navigation