The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Impatience

  • Larry G. Epstein
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_987

Abstract

Impatience refers to the preference for earlier rather than later consumption an idea which stems from Böhm-Bawerk (1912) and Fisher (1930), among others. Preference orderings that exhibit impatience are also described as being myopic or as embodying discounting. Because in many contexts the future has no natural termination date, an infinite horizon framework is most appropriate and convenient for the analysis of many problems in intertemporal economics. The open-endedness of the future raises several issues surrounding impatience (its presence, degree, and the precise form it takes) which do not arise in finite horizon models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Araujo, A. 1985. Lack of Pareto optimal allocations in economies with infinitely many commodities: The need for impatience. Econometrica 53(2): 455–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bewley, T. 1972. Existence of equilibria in economies with infinitely many commodities. Journal of Economic Theory 4(3): 514–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, D.J., and L.M. Lewis. 1981. Myopic economic agents. Econometrica 49(2): 359–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burness, H.S. 1973. Impatience and the preference for advancement in the timing of satisfactions. Journal of Economic Theory 6(5): 495–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diamond, P.A. 1965. The evaluation of infinite utility streams. Econometrica 33: 170–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fisher, I. 1930. The theory of interest. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Koopmans, T.C. 1960. Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 28: 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Koopmans, T.C. 1966. On the concept of optimal economic growth. In The econometric approach to development planning. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  9. Koopmans, T.C. 1967. Objectives, constraints, and outcomes in optimal growth models. Econometrica 35: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koopmans, T.C., P.A. Diamond, and R.E. Williamson. 1964. Stationary utility and time perspective. Econometrica 32: 82–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Magill, M.J.P. 1981. Infinite horizon programs. Econometrica 49(3): 679–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ramsey, F.P. 1928. A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal 38: 543–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Svensson, L.G. 1980. Equity among generations. Econometrica 48(5): 1251–1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. von Böhm-Bawerk, E. 1912. Positive theory of capital. South Holland: Libertarian Press, 1959.Google Scholar
  15. von Weizsäcker, C.C. 1965. Existence of optimal programs of accumulation for an infinite time horizon. Review of Economic Studies 32: 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Larry G. Epstein
    • 1
  1. 1.