Skip to main content

Labour Process

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 57 Accesses

Abstract

The labour process is a Marxian term that refers to the ways in which labour and capital combine to produce goods and services. The emphasis on the role of labour in the production process derives from Marx’s (1867) distinction between labour-power and labour. Labour-power is the capacity to work that the capitalist purchases for a wage on the labour market; labour is the effort actually expended by a unit of labour-power in the production process. Given wages and prices, the surplus-value that the capitalist extracts from the production process depends upon the amount of labour services that he can elicit from the labour-power that he has purchased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Baran, P., and P. Sweezy. 1966. Monopoly capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, M. 1985. The age of manufactures, 1700–1820. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S. 1985. The production process in a competitive economy: Walrasian, Neo-Hobbesian, and Marxian models. American Economic Review 75(2): 16–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, H. 1974. Labor and monopoly capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, D. 1980. Workers in industrial America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler Jr., A.D. 1977. The visible hand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler Jr., A.D. 1980. Giant enterprise: Ford, General Motors, and the automobile industry. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano, M. 1985. The Japanese automobile industry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doeringer, P., and M. Piore. 1971. Internal labor markets and manpower analysis. Lexington: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. 1979. Contested terrain. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbaum, B., and W. Lazonick (eds.). 1986. The decline of the British economy. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D., R. Edwards, and M. Reich. 1982. Segmented work, divided workers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R., and J. Zeitlin (eds.). 1985. Divisions of labour. Brighton: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hounshell, D. 1984. From the American system to mass production, 1800–1932. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, S. 1984. The development of internal labor markets in American manufacturing firms. In Internal labor markets, ed. P. Osterman. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W. 1979. Industrial relations and technical change: The case of the self-acting mule. Cambridge Journal of Economics 3(September): 231–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W. 1981. Production relations, labor productivity, and choice of technique: British and US cotton spinning. Journal of Economic History 41(3): 491–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W. 1983. Technological change and the control of work: The development of capital–labor relations in US mass production industries. In Managerial strategies and industrial relations, ed. H. Gospel and C. Littler. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W. 1984. Work, pay, and productivity: Theoretical implications of some historical research. Photocopy, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W. 1986a. Theory and history in Marxian economics. In The future of economic history, ed. A. Field. Hingham: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W. 1986b. Strategy, structure, and management development in the United States and Britain. In Development of managerial enterprise, ed. K. Kobayashi and H. Morikawa. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W., and W. Mass. 1984. The performance of the British cotton industry, 1870–1913. Research in Economic History 9: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litterer, J. 1963. Systematic management: Design for organizational recoupling in American manufacturing firms. Business History Review 37(Winter): 369–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marglin, S. 1974. What do bosses do?: The origins and functions of hierarchy in capitalist production. Review of Radical Political Economics 6(2): 60–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marglin, S. 1979. Catching flies with honey: An inquiry into management initiatives to humanize work. Economic Analysis and Workers’ Management 13: 473–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. 1867. Capital, vol. I. New York: Vintage, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, S. 1981. The five dollar day. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. 1979. Workers’ control in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D. 1977. America by design. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, P. (ed.). 1984. Internal labor markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M., and C. Sabel. 1984. The second industrial divide. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, S. 1965. The genesis of modern management. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel, R. 1977. Workshop of the world: Steam power and hand technology in mid-Victorian Britain. History Workshop Journal 3(Spring): 6–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schor, J., and S. Bowles. 1984. The cost of job loss and the incidence of strikes. Harvard Institute of Economic Research discussion paper no. 1105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slichter, S. 1929. The current labor policies of American industries. Quarterly Journal of Economics 43(May): 393–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, R. 1983. IBM: Colossus in transition. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E.P. 1967. Time, work-discipline, and industrial capitalism. Past and Present 38(December): 56–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, F. (ed.). 1981. The Dynamics of labour market segmentation. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S. (ed.). 1982. The Degradation of work?: Skill, deskilling, and the labour process. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbalist, A. 1975. The limits of work humanization. Review of Radical Political Economics 7(2): 50–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lazonick, W. (2018). Labour Process. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_983

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics