Abstract
Americans generally consider apple pie, hot dogs, and baseball to be uniquely theirs in origin. Less pride of origin is assigned to the Basing Point System, originally known as Pittsburgh-Plus. However, this lack of pride in origin did not characterize American public opinion during the early years of Pittsburgh-Plus. In fact, at the turn of the century, the members of the Industrial Commission (the forerunner to the Federal Trade Commission), most members of the Congress of the United States, and later for many, many years the majority of those on the Supreme Court considered the system to be competitive and hence desirable. Before evaluating its pros and cons, a brief inquiry into its early history is in order.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsBibliography
Aetna Portland Cement Co. v FTC. (1946). 157 F. 2nd 533 (1946), Respondents Brief p. 127.
Averitt, N.W. 1980. The meaning of ‘unfair’ methods of competition in section 5 of the Federal trade Commission Act. Boston College Law Review 21(2): 227–300.
Brown Shoe Co. (1966). 384 US 316.
Federal Trade Commission. 1922. Docket 760, Pittsburgh-Plus Complaint, Record pp. 10861–2.
Fetter, F.A. 1931. The masquerade of monopoly. New York: Harcourt/Brace & Co.
Greenhut, M.L. 1956. Plant location in theory and practice. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 4th printing, Westport, Conn.: The Greenwood Press, 1983.
Greenhut, M.L. 1970. A theory of the firm in economic space. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. 2nd printing, Austin, Texas: Lone Star Publishing Co., 1974.
Greenhut, M.L. 1981. Spatial pricing in the USA, West Germany, and Japan. Economica 48(189): 79–86.
Greenhut, M.L., and J. Greenhut. 1977. Nonlinearity of delivered price schedules and predatory pricing. Econometrica 45(8): 1871–1875.
Greenhut, M.L., J. Greenhut, and S. Li. 1980. Spatial pricing patterns in the United States. Quarterly Journal of Economics 94: 329–350.
Greenhut, M.L., G. Norman, and G. Hung. 1986. Imperfect competition: A spatial approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haddock, D.O. 1982. Basing-point pricing: Competitive vs. collusive theories. American Economic Review 72(3): 289–306.
Hoover, E.M. 1936–7. Spatial price discrimination. Review of Economic Studies 4: 182–91.
In re Plywood Antitrust Litigation. (1978). MOL Docket Number 159, United States District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana.
Loescher, S.M. 1959. Imperfect collusion in the cement industry, 18–22. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 232–40.
Loescher, S.M. 1980. Economic collusion, civil conspiracy, and treble damage deterrents: The Sherman act breakthrough with southern plywood. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 20(4): 6–35.
Machlup, F. 1952. The political economy of monopoly. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Phlips, L. 1983. The economics of price discrimination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Posner, R.A. 1976. Antitrust law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stigler, G.J. 1949. A theory of delivered prices. American Economic Review 39: 1143–1159.
TNEC Papers. 1940. The basing point method, vol. 3. Published by The Corporation.
Triangle Conduit & Cable Co. v FTC. (1948). 168 F 2nd 1975 (7th Cir. 1948).
Turner, D.F. 1962. The definition of agreement under the Sherman Act. Harvard Law Review 75: 655.
Wilcox, C. 1960. Public policies toward business. Revised edn, Homewood: Richard D. Irwin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Greenhut, M.L. (2018). Basing Point System. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_90
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_90
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences