The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Multisector Growth Models

  • Mukul Majumdar
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_894

Abstract

Multisector models are essential ingredients for general equilibrium analysis of an economy over time. They have been used extensively in the literature whenever an adequate description of the relevant issues makes it inappropriate to use aggregative models for formal analysis. A study of optimal accumulation of capital goods or optimal depletion of exhaustible resources is a key to developing a theory of economic planning. The specific results can also be viewed from a different perspective. The idea that markets and prices can be used to achieve efficiency in a decentralized manner has been central to economics. The fundamental theorems of ‘new’ welfare economics identify conditions under which competitive economies attain an efficient or Pareto optimal allocation of resources. It is natural to enquire whether in dynamic models such a connection between optimality and competitive prices can be established. One possibility is to use the basic static model and treat the same good at different points of time as different commodities. While such an approach is not entirely shorn of merit, a fundamental paper by Malinvaud (1953) suggested that when economic activity does not terminate at a known date, the outcome of a period-by-period competitive process may fail to be optimal. Indeed, the possibility (or otherwise) of designing an informationally decentralized resource allocation mechanism that leads to optimal outcomes has been the subject of considerable speculation and over the last thirty years it has become a ‘classical’ problem in dynamic models with an infinite horizon. In what follows, I shall review some recent results that throw new light on this topic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Brock, W.A., and M. Majumdar 1985. On characterizing optimal competitive programs in terms of decentralizable conditions. Working Paper No. 333, Department of Economics, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  2. Hurwicz, L., and M. Majumdar 1984. Some remarks on optimal intertemporal allocation and decentralization of decisions. Working Paper, Department of Economics, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  3. Koopmans, T.C. 1958. Three essays on the state of economic science. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Majumdar, M. 1974. Efficient programs in infinite dimensional spaces: A complete characterization. Journal of Economic Theory 7: 355–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Majumdar, M., and T. Mitra. 1976. A note on the role of the transversality condition in signalling capital overaccumulation. Journal of Economic Theory 13: 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Malinvaud, E. 1953. Capital accumulation and efficient allocation of resources. Econometrica 21: 23–68.Google Scholar
  7. Mitra, T. 1976. On efficient capital accumulation in a multi-sector neoclassical model. Review of Economic Studies 43: 423–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mukul Majumdar
    • 1
  1. 1.