The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Labour Market Discrimination

  • Irene Bruegel
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_886

Abstract

The facts of continued discrimination on grounds of sex and race point up some of the inadequacy of neoclassical labour market theory. The idea that pay reflects value, bar peripheral imperfections, is at odds with the experience of blacks and women in the labour market. Indeed if the newly won concepts of comparable worth and equal value now embodied in the American and British equal pay legislation were truly effective, many established pay relativities would be undermined. Neoclassical labour market theory merely adds discrimination on to its existing model but discrimination, as a structural feature of the labour market, calls up a very different approach to the analysis of labour markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Becker, G. 1957. The economics of discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Beller, A. 1982. Occupational segregation by sex: determinants and changes. Journal of Human Resources 17(3): 371–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergman, B. 1971. The effect on white incomes of discrimination in employment. Journal of Political Economy 79(2): 294–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiswick, B.R. 1983. The earnings and human capital of American Jews. Journal of Human Resources 18(3): 313–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cockburn, C. 1986. The machinery of domination. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dex, S. 1985. The sexual division of work. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.Google Scholar
  7. England, P. 1982. The failure of human capital theory to explain occupational sex segregation. Journal of Human Resources 17(3): 358–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greenhalgh, C. 1980. Male–female wage differentials in Great Britain: Is marriage an equal opportunity? Economic Journal 90: 751–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hartman, H. 1976. Capitalism, patriarchy and job segregation by sex. In Women and the workplace, ed. R. Blaxall and B. Reagan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Humphries, J. 1977. Class struggle and the persistence of working class families. Cambridge Journal of Economics 1: 241–258.Google Scholar
  11. Lloyd, C., and B. Niemi. 1979. The economics of sex differentials. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  12. McNabb, R., and G. Psacharopoulas. 1981. Racial earnings differentials in the UK. Oxford Economic Papers 33: 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Madden, J.F. 1973. The economics of sex discrimination. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  14. Mincer, J., and S. Polachek. 1974. Family investments in human capital: Earnings of women. Journal of Political Economy 82(Pt. 2): 118–134.Google Scholar
  15. Polachek, S. 1979. Occupational segregation among women: Theory, evidence and a prognosis. In Women in the labor market, ed. C.B. Lloyd, E.S. Andrews, and C.L. Gilroy, 137–157. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Sloane, P. 1985. Discrimination in the labour market. In Labour economics, ed. D. Carline. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  17. Thurow, L.C. 1976. Generating inequality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irene Bruegel
    • 1
  1. 1.