The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Health Economics

  • Barbara Wolfe
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_844

Abstract

Health care expenditures form an ever-increasing burden in most developed countries, especially the United States, where they accounted for 16.0 per cent of GDP in 2004, up from 5.1 per cent of GDP in 1960. These cost increases alone suggest that health economics is a dynamic field of economic research, but the importance and the interest of the field are driven by broader considerations. This article delineates important market failures and research issues in health and health care, the relationship between income and health, methodological issues in the measurement of health, and quality issues in the measurement of health care.

Keywords

Absolute deprivation–health hypothesis Income–health hypotheses Adverse selection Asymmetric information Crowding out Deadweight loss Diffusion of technology Disability, economics of Gradient effects Health capital Health economics Health insurance Health maintenance organizations (HMOs) Hospital economics Managed competition Market failures in health care Medicaid (USA) Medical practice licensing Medicare (USA) Moral hazard Mortality Non-profit organizations Nutrition Payroll tax Pharmaceutical industry RAND Health Insurance Experiment Tax expenditures Well-being 

JEL Classifications

I1 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Rashi Fein, Robert Haveman, John Mullahy, Nathan Tefft and Jason Fletcher for helpful suggestions.

Bibliography

  1. Arrow, K. 1963. Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. American Economic Review 53: 941–973.Google Scholar
  2. Baumol, W., and W. Bowen. 1966. Performing arts – The economic dilemma. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
  3. Deaton, A. 2002. Policy implications of the gradient of health and wealth. Health Affairs 21 (2): 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Duan, N., W. Manning, C. Morris, and J. Newhouse. 1983. A comparison of alternative models for the demand for medical care. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 1: 115–126.Google Scholar
  5. Enthoven, A. 1978. A consumer choice health plan: a national health insurance proposal based on regulated competition in the private sector. New England Journal of Medicine 298: 650–658. and 709–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gerdtham, U.-G., M. Johannesson, L. Lundberg, and D. Isacson. 1999. The demand for health: Results from new measures of health capital. European Journal of Political Economy 15: 501–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ginzberg, E. 1989. Physician supply in the year 2000. Health Affairs 8 (2): 84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grossman, M. 1972. On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. Journal of Political Economy 80: 223–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mullahy, J., S. Robert, and B. Wolfe. 2004. Health, income and inequality. In Social inequality, ed. K. Neckerman. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Newhouse, J., and Health Insurance Experiment Group. 1994. Free for all? Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Nyman, J. 1999. The value of health insurance: The access motive. Journal of Health Economics 18: 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pauly, M. 1968. The economics of moral hazard: Comment. American Economic Review 58: 531–537.Google Scholar
  13. Preston, S. 1975. The changing relation between mortality and level of economic development. Population Studies 29: 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Wolfe
    • 1
  1. 1.