Abstract
The term ‘neoclassical’ was first used by Veblen (1900, pp. 242, 260–2, 265–8), in order to characterize Marshall and Marshallian economics. Veblen did not appeal to any similarity in theoretical structure between the economics of Marshall and classical economics in order to defend this novel designation. Rather, he perceived Marshall’s Cambridge School to have a continuity with classical economics on the alleged basis of a common utilitarian approach and the common assumption of a hedonistic psychology. Derivative from Veblen’s use, this meaning of the term subsequently gained some currency, particularly in the 1920s and 1930s; for example, in the writings of Wesley Mitchell, J.A. Hobson, Maurice Dobb and Eric Roll. It is evident that the emergence of this notion of Marshallian economics as a ‘neoclassical’ project also involved, at least in part, an acquiescence to Marshall’s portrayal of his own economics as a continuation of the classical tradition, though Marshall’s sense of the continuity is not really that perceived by Veblen. Keynes (1936, pp. 177–8) also employed the term, though in an idiosyncratic matter, derivative from his equally idiosyncratic notion of classical economics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Aspromourgos, T. 1986. On the origins of the term ‘neoclassical’. Cambridge Journal of Economics 10: 265–270.
Colander, D. 2000. The death of neoclassical economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22: 127–143.
Dobb, M. 1924. The entrepreneur myth. Economica 4: 66–81.
Hamilton, W.H. 1923. Vestigial economics. New Republic, 4 April.
Hicks, J.R. 1932. Marginal productivity and the principle of variation. Economica 12: 79–88.
Keynes, J.M. 1936. The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan.
Samuelson, P.A. 1955. Economics: An introductory analysis. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Stigler, G.J. 1941. Production and distribution theories. New York: Macmillan.
Veblen, T.B. 1900. The preconceptions of economic science III. Quarterly Journal of Economics 14: 240–269.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Aspromourgos, T. (2018). ‘Neoclassical’. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_723
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_723
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences