The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Natural Rate of Unemployment

  • Michael J. Pries
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_716

Abstract

Milton Friedman defined the natural rate of unemployment as the level of unemployment that resulted from real economic forces, the long-run level of which could not be altered by monetary policy. Macroeconomic policymakers continue to view the natural rate as a key benchmark due to the belief that monetary policy can counter short-run deviations of the unemployment rate from the natural rate. It is important, however, that policymakers focus as much attention on understanding the real determinants of the natural rate, and the policies that can affect it, as they do on trying to identify and counteract deviations from it.

Keywords

American Economics Association Demography Friedman, M. Inflationary expectations Labour supply Natural rate of unemployment Phillips curve Rational expectations Real business cycles Search models of unemployment Taylor rule Unemployment insurance Unemployment–inflation tradeoff Wage rigidity 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Davis, S., J. Haltiwanger, and S. Schuh. 1996. Job creation and destruction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Friedman, M. 1968. The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review 58: 1–17.Google Scholar
  3. Friedman, M. 1976. Nobel lecture: Inflation and unemployment. Journal of Political Economy 85: 451–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hall, R. 2005a. Employment fluctuations with equilibrium wage stickiness. American Economic Review 95: 50–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hall, R. 2005b. Separating the business cycle from other economic fluctuations. In The Greenspan era: Lessons for the future. Proceedings of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Symposium, August.Google Scholar
  6. Hopenhayn, H., and R. Rogerson. 1992. Job turnover and policy evaluation: A general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Political Economy 101: 915–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hosios, A. 1990. On the efficiency of matching and related models of search and unemployment. Review of Economic Studies 57: 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kydland, F., and E. Prescott. 1982. Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 50: 1345–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ljungqvist, L., and T. Sargent. 1998. The European unemployment dilemma. Journal of Political Economy 106: 514–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lucas, R. 1973. Some international evidence on output-inflation tradeoffs. American Economic Review 63: 326–334.Google Scholar
  11. Mortensen, D., and C. Pissarides. 1994. Job creation and job destruction in the theory of unemployment. Review of Economic Studies 61: 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Phillips, A. 1958. The relationship between unemployment and the rate of change of money wage rates in the United Kingdom, 1861–1957. Economica 58: 283–299.Google Scholar
  13. Pries, M. 2004. Persistence of employment fluctuations: A model of recurring job loss. Review of Economic Studies 71: 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shimer, R. 1998. In Why is the U.S. unemployment rate so much lower? NBER macroeconomics annual, ed. B. Bernanke and J. Rotemberg, vol. 13. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Shimer, R. 2005. The cyclical behavior of equilibrium unemployment and vacancies. American Economic Review 95: 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Taylor, J. 1999. Monetary policy rules, NBER conference report series. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Pries
    • 1
  1. 1.