The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Imputation

  • Murray N. Rothbard
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_699

Abstract

‘Imputation’ is a term introduced into economics as Zurechnung by the Austrian School economist Friedrich Freiherr von Wieser (1889). The term was a legal one, and the analogy was based on the legal method by which the jurist imputes guilt or liability to one or another criminal or tortfeasor. Imputation was a central concern of the Austrian School, since its analysis centred on the nature of the means–ends relationship (Mises 1949) and on the process by which the subjective valuations and value-preferences of individual consumers ‘impute’ value to the goods being produced. As Carl Menger, founder of the Austrian School, pointed out, the valuations by consumers of their satisfactions, or ends, impute values to the consumer goods, the means, that are expected to satisfy those wants (Menger 1871). And since producers’ goods are only means to the production and sale of consumer goods, the values of the factors of production will in turn be determined by and be equal to the expected values of the consumer goods to the consumers. In short, values are ‘imputed’ back to the prices of the factors of production; the rents of Champagne land are high because the consumers value the champagne highly, and not the other way round. ‘Costs’ of resources are reflections of the value of products forgone.

Keywords

Aristotle Austrian School Böhm-Bawerk, E. von Factor prices Imputation Marginal productivity theory Menger, C. Socialist calculation debate Subjective theory of value Wieser, F. F. von Mises, L. E. von Hayek, F. A. von 

JEL Classifications

D2 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Aristotle 1928. Topica. Trans. W.A. Pickard-Cambridge and included. In The works of Aristotle, vol. 1, ed. W.D. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Hayek, F.A. 1926. Some remarks on the problem of imputation. In Money, capital, and fluctuations: Early essays, ed. F.A. Hayek. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1984.Google Scholar
  3. Hayek, F.A. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. In Individualism and economic order, ed. F.A. Hayek. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1948.Google Scholar
  4. Kauder, E. 1965. A history of marginal utility theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Menger, C. 1871. Principles of economics. Glencoe: Free Press, 1950.Google Scholar
  6. Schumpeter, J.A. 1942. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  7. Spengler, J. 1955. Aristotle on economic imputation and related matters. Southern Economic Journal 21: 371–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Stigler, G. 1941. Production and distribution theories: The formative period. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. von Wieser, F. 1889. Natural value, 1956. New York: Kelley & Millman.Google Scholar
  10. von Mises, L. 1949. Human action: A treatise on economics, 3rd ed. Chicago: Regnery, 1966.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Murray N. Rothbard
    • 1
  1. 1.