Abstract
Fiscal stance is commonly understood to denote the expansionary or contractionary implications for the economy of a government’s budgetary policy. More precisely, it represents an attempt to summarize, in a single measure, the combined effect on aggregate demand, and therefore potentially on real output and income, of all the various decisions taken by government in respect of public expenditure, taxation and other sources of revenue which go to make up a national budget. As such it presupposes not only that governments can affect demand in this way, but also that it is possible to devise an indicator of this kind which is sufficiently widely accepted as to be useful. This later proposition has been questioned even by a number of self-professed Keynesian economists, who have emphasized the difficulty both of aggregating the effects of the many different items included in the budget and of disentangling these from other potential influences on demand.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Blinder, A.S., and R.M. Solow. 1974. Analytical foundations of fiscal policy. In The economics of public finance, ed. A.S. Blinder et al. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Brown, E.C. 1956. Fiscal policy in the thirties: A reappraisal. American Economic Review 46: 857–879.
Buiter, W.H. 1983. The theory of optimum deficits and debt. In The economics of large government deficits. Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
Buiter, W.H. 1985. A guide to public sector debt and deficits. Economic Policy 1: 13–79.
Chand, S.K. 1978. Summary measures of fiscal influence. In IMF Staff Papers 24, Washington, DC.
Committee for Economic Development. 1947. Taxes and the budget: A program for prosperity in a free economy. Washington, DC.
Dernberg, T.F. 1975. Fiscal analysis in the Federal Republic of Germany: The cyclically neutral budget. IMF Staff Papers 22: 825–827.
Kaldor, N. 1944. Appendix C of W.H. Beveridge. In Full employment in a free society. London: Allen & Unwin.
Lotz, J. 1971. Techniques of measuring the effects of fiscal policy, OECD economic outlook, Occasional studies. Paris: OECD.
Netherlands Ministry of Finance. 1970. The Netherlands budget memorandum 1970, Annex 2. The Hague.
OECD. 1984. Economic outlook. Paris: OECD.
Okun, A.M., and Teeters, N.H. 1970. The full employment surplus revisited. Brookings Papers on Economics Activity No. 1, 770–110.
Price, R.W.R., and Muller, P. 1984. Structural budget indicators and the interpretation of fiscal policy stance in OECD ‘economies’. OECD Economic Studies (3): 27–72.
Tanzi, V. (ed.). 1984. Taxation, inflation and interest rates. Washington, DC: IMF.
Taylor, C.T., and Threadgold, A.R. 1979. Real national savings and its sectoral composition. Bank of England Discussion Papers No. 6. London: Economic Intelligence Department, Bank of England.
Tobin, J., and W.H. Buiter. 1976. Long run effects of fiscal and monetary policy on aggregate demand. In Monetarism, ed. J.L. Stein. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Ward, T.S., and R.R. Neild. 1978. The measurement and reform of budgetary policy. London: Heinemann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ward, T. (2018). Fiscal Stance. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_61
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_61
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences