The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Bourgeoisie

  • J. Foster
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_611

Abstract

The term bourgeoisie originally referred to the legal status of the town citizen in feudal France. In the Encyclopédie Diderot contrasted the political subordination of the citoyen bourgeois with the self-governing citoyen magistrat of ancient Greece. At the same time the French bourgeoisie (this term was first used in the 13th century) possessed certain economic and social rights, implicitly associated with the property required for trade, that distinguished it from the ordinary urban inhabitant or domicilié (Diderot 1753, III, 486–9).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Aaronovitch, S. 1961. The ruling class. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, P. 1974. Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
  3. Balibar, E. 1970. Basic concepts of historical materialism. In Reading capital, ed. L. Althusser and E. Balibar. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
  4. Brenner, R. 1985. Agrarian class structure and economic development in pre-industrial Europe. In The Brenner debate, ed. T. Aston. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Burnham, J. 1942. The managerial revolution. London: Putnam.Google Scholar
  6. Chandler, A. 1962. Strategy and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Diderot, D. 1753. Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences. Paris: Briasson.Google Scholar
  8. Dobb, M. 1946. Studies in the development of capitalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Dobb, M. 1950. A reply. Science and Society.Google Scholar
  10. Gouldner, A. 1979. The future of intellectuals and the rise of the new class. New York: Seabury Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hegel, G. 1820. Naturrecht und Staatswischenschaft in Grundrisse. In Werke, vol. VIII, ed. E. Gans. Berlin.Google Scholar
  12. Hilferding, R. 1910. Das Finanzkapital. Vienna: I. Brand. Trans. M. Watnick and S. Gordon as Finance capital, ed. T. Bottomore. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.Google Scholar
  13. Lenin, V.I. 1916. Imperialism: The highest stage of capitalism. In Collected works, vol. XXIII. Moscow: Progress, 1964.Google Scholar
  14. Lenin, V.I. 1917. The impending catastrophe and how to combat it. In Collected works, vol. XXV. Moscow: Progress, 1964.Google Scholar
  15. Marx, K. 1842. Debate on the law on thefts of wood. In Collected works, vol. I. Moscow: Progress, 1975.Google Scholar
  16. Marx, K. 1844. Contribution to the critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Law. In Collected works, vol. III. Moscow: Progress, 1975.Google Scholar
  17. Marx, K. 1848. The Manifesto of the Communist Party. In Collected works, vol. VI. Moscow: Progress, 1976.Google Scholar
  18. Marx, K. 1852. The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon. In Collected works, vol. XI. Moscow: Progress, 1976.Google Scholar
  19. Marx, K. 1867. Capital, vol. I. Moscow: Progress, 1953.Google Scholar
  20. Marx, K. 1894. Capital, vol. III. Moscow: Progress, 1959.Google Scholar
  21. Moore, B. 1969. The social origins of democracy and dictatorship. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  22. Pahl, R., and J. Winkler. 1974. The economic elite: Theory and practice. In Elites and power in British society, ed. P. Stanworth and A. Giddens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Pirenne, H. 1895. L’origine des constitutions urbaines au moyen age. Revue historique 57.Google Scholar
  24. Pirenne, H. 1925. Medieval Cities: Their origin and the renewal of trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Schumpeter, J. 1943. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  26. Scott, J. 1984. Directors of industry: The British corporate network. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  27. Siéyes, E. 1789. Qu’est-ce que le Tiers Etat? Paris.Google Scholar
  28. Sweezy, P. 1950. The transition from feudalism to capitalism. Science and Society 14(2): 134–157.Google Scholar
  29. Szelenyi, I. 1985. Social policy and state socialism. In Stagnation and renewal in social policy, ed. G. Esping-Anderson. White Plains: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  30. Useem, M. 1984. The inner circle. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Weber, M. 1901–2. Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 20.Google Scholar
  32. Weber, M. 1920. Gessämmelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Foster
    • 1
  1. 1.