Skip to main content

Easterlin Hypothesis

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Abstract

The economic and social fortunes of a birth cohort tend to vary as a function of that cohort’s relative size, approximated by the crude birth rate surrounding the cohort’s birth. Effects have been observed on young men’s earnings and unemployment rates, college enrolment rates, marriage and divorce, fertility, crime, and suicide rates. These effects have been found to be asymmetrical about the peak of a baby boom, and the original hypothesis has been extended to suggest a wide range of effects on the economy as a whole, from GDP growth rate, through interest rates and stock market performance, to measures of productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Duesenberry, J.S. 1949. Income, saving, and the theory of consumer behaviour. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R.A. 1980. Birth and fortune, 1st ed. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R.A. 1987. Birth and fortune, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R.A., C. Macdonald, and D.J. Macunovich. 1990. How have the American baby boomers fared? Earnings and well-being of young adults 1964–1987. Journal of Population Economics 3: 277–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, C., and J. Angst. 1983. Birth order: Its influence on personality. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fair, R.C., and K. Dominguez. 1991. Effects of the changing U.S. age distribution on macroeconomic equations. American Economic Review 81: 1276–1294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.B. 1976. The overeducated American. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heer, D.M. 1985. Effects of sibling number on child outcome. Annual Review of Sociology 11: 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon, Y., and M.P. Shields. 2005. The Easterlin hypothesis in the recent experience of higher-income OECD countries: A panel-data approach. Journal of Population Economics 18: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korenman, S., and D. Neumark. 2000. Cohort crowding and the youth labour market: A cross-national analysis. In Youth employment and joblessness in advanced countries, NBER comparative labour market series, ed. D.G. Blanchflower and R.B. Freeman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macunovich, D.J. 1998. Fertility and the Easterlin hypothesis: An assessment of the literature. Journal of Population Economics 11: 1–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macunovich, D.J. 2002. Birth quake: The baby boom and its after shocks. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Macunovich, D.J., and R.A. Easterlin. 1990. How parents have coped: The effect of life cycle decisions on the economic status of pre-school age children, 1964–1987. Population and Development Review 16: 301–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, N.G., and N.D. Weil. 1989. The baby boom, the baby bust and the housing market. Regional Science and Economics 19: 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, H.M., and J.B. Baesel. 1990. The macroeconomic impact of the baby boom generation. Journal of Macroeconomics 12: 167–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNown, R., and S. Rajbhandary. 2003. Time series analysis of fertility and female labour market behaviour. Journal of Population Economics 16: 501–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, R.M., and P.A. Gwartney-Gibbs. 1989. Relative cohort size and political alienation: Three methodological issues and a replication supporting the Easterlin hypothesis. American Sociological Review 54: 476–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, R.M., J. Stockard, and L. Isaacson. 1999. The enduring effects of cohort characteristics on age-specific homicide rates 1960–1995. American Journal of Sociology 104: 1061–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pampel, F.C. 2001. The institutional context of population change: Patterns of fertility and mortality across high-income nations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pampel, F.C., and H.E. Peters. 1995. The Easterlin effect. Annual Review of Sociology 21: 163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schieber, S.J., and J.B. Shoven. 1994. The consequences of population aging on private pension fund saving and asset markets, Working paper no. 4665. Cambridge, MA: NBER.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stockard, J., and R.M. O’Brien. 2002. Cohort effects on suicide rates: International variations. American Sociological Review 67: 854–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldorf, B., and P. Byun. 2005. Meta-analysis of the impact of age structure on fertility. Journal of Population Economics 18: 14–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, F. 1979. Effects of cohort size on earnings: The baby boom babies’ financial bust. Journal of Political Economy 87: 65–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Macunovich, D.J., Easterlin, R.A. (2018). Easterlin Hypothesis. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_531

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics