Abstract
It has long been assumed that extended families are typical of pre-capitalist or non-capitalist societies, while the nuclear family form is the product of industrialization and urbanization. Modernization theories, deriving ultimately from nineteenth-century thinkers such as the French social reformer Frédéric Le Play (e.g., 1871), and finding different forms of expression in the Chicago School of urban sociology (e.g., Wirth 1938) and Parsonian functionalism (e.g., Parsons and Bales 1955), was articulated in a moderate form by W. Goode:While Goode himself recognizes that the conjugal family was prevalent in Western Europe long before the Industrial Revolution and limits himself to stating how functionally suited it is to the industrial system, it has long been assumed that the nuclear family emerged as a result of the development of capitalism (e.g., Tawney 1912). How this supposed transformation is interpreted depends on ideological positions: for those critical of the effects of capitalism the extended family evokes a world of solidarity and human values, while for the opposite tradition which finds its decisive expression in liberalism as a political doctrine, the extended family serves to maintain dependency between kin and to prevent the development of the entrepreneurial spirit.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Anderson, M. 1971. Family structure in nineteenth century Lancashire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, M. 1980. Approaches to the history of the Western family 1500–1914. London: Macmillan.
Berkner, L. 1972. The stem family and developmental cycle of the peasant household: An eighteenth-century Austrian example. American Historical Review 77: 398–418.
Flandrin, J-L. 1976. Families in former times. Trans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
Goode, W. 1963. World revolution and family patterns. New York/Glencoe: Free Press.
Goody, J. 1972. The evolution of the family. In Household and family in past time, ed. P. Laslett and R. Wall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goody, J. 1976. Production and reproduction: A comparative study of the domestic domain. Cambridge: Cambridge, University Press.
Goody, J. 1983. The development of the family and marriage in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goody, J., J. Thirsk, and E.P. Thompson (eds.). 1976. Family and inheritance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hareven, T. 1982. Family time and industrial time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harris, O. 1982. Households and their boundaries. History Workshop Journal 13: 143–152.
Laslett, P. 1972. Introduction. In Household and family in past time, ed. P. Laslett and R. Wall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Le Play, F. 1871. L’organisation de la famille selon le vrai modèle signalé par l’histoire de toutes les races et de tous les temps. Paris.
Macfarlane, A. 1970. The family life of Ralph Josselin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Macfarlane, A. 1978. The origins of English individualism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
McIntosh, M. 1979. The welfare state and the needs of the dependent family. In Fit work for women, ed. S. Burman. London: Croom Helm.
Medick, H. 1976. The proto-industrial family economy. Social History 1(3): 291–315.
Netting, R., R. Wilk, and E. Arnould (eds.). 1984. Households. comparative and historical studies of the domestic group. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Parsons, T., and R. Bales. 1955. Family. Socialization and interaction process. Glencoe: Free Press.
Shorter, E. 1975. The making of the modern family. New York: Basic Books.
Smith, R. (ed.). 1984. Land, kinship and life cycle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, J., I. Wallerstein, and H.D. Evers (eds.). 1984. Households and the world economy. California: Sage Publications.
Tawney, R.H. 1912. The agrarian problem of the sixteenth century. London: Longmans.
Tilly, L., and J. Scott. 1978. Women, work and family. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Wirth, L. 1938. Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology 44(July): 1–24.
Wolf, A. 1984. Family life and the life cycle in rural China. In Households. Comparative and historical studies of the domestic group, ed. R. Netting, R. Wilk, and E. Arnould. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Yanagisako, S. 1979. Family and household: The analysis of domestic groups. Annual Review of Anthropology 8: 161–205.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Harris, O. (2018). Extended Family. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_425
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_425
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences