The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Creative Destruction

  • Ricardo J. Caballero
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_391

Abstract

Creative destruction refers to the incessant product and process innovation mechanism by which new production units replace outdated ones. This restructuring process permeates major aspects of macroeconomic performance, not only long-run growth but also economic fluctuations, structural adjustment and the functioning of factor markets. Over the long run, the process of creative destruction accounts for over 50 per cent of productivity growth. At business cycle frequency, restructuring typically declines during recessions, and this add a significant cost to downturns. Obstacles to the process of creative destruction can have severe short- and long-run macroeconomic consequences.

Keywords

Banking reform Business cycles Canada–US Free Trade Agreement Creative destruction Deregulation of product markets Economic growth Factor reallocation Hayek, F. Innovation International competition Job flows Job security Labour market regulation Liquidationist thesis Productivity growth Recessions Robbins, L. Schumpeter, J. Structural change 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Aghion, P., and P. Howitt. 1998. Endogenous growth theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baily, N., C. Hulten, and D. Campbell. 1992. Productivity dynamics in manufacturing establishments. In Brookings papers on economic activity: Microeconomics, ed. M. Baily and C. Winston. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  3. Bartelsman, E., and P. Dhrymes. 1994. Productivity dynamics: US manufacturing plants, 1972–1986, Finance and economics discussion series. Vol. 94-1. Washington, DC: Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System.Google Scholar
  4. Bartelsman, E., J. Haltiwanger, and S. Scarpetta. 2004. Microeconomic evidence of creative destruction in industrial and developing countries. Mimeo: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  5. Bernard, A., J. Jensen, and P. Schott. 2006. Survival of the best fit: Exposure to low- wage countries and the (uneven) growth of US manufacturing plants. Journal of International Economics 68: 219–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertrand, M., A. Schoar, and D. Thesmar.2004. Banking deregulation and industry structure: Evidence from the French banking reforms of 1985. Discussion paper no. 4488. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
  7. Caballero, R. 2006. Specificity and the macroeconomics of restructuring. Yrjo Jahnsson lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Caballero, R., and M. Hammour. 1994. The cleansing effect of recessions. American Economic Review 84: 1350–1368.Google Scholar
  9. Caballero, R., and M. Hammour. 1996a. The fundamental transformation in macroeconomics. American Economic Review 86 (2): 181–186.Google Scholar
  10. Caballero, R., and M. Hammour. 1996b. On the timing and efficiency of creative destruction. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111: 805–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caballero, R., and M. Hammour. 1996c. On the ills of adjustment. Journal of Development Economics 51: 161–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caballero, R., and M. Hammour. 1998a. The macroeconomics of specificity. Journal of Political Economy 106: 724–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caballero, R., and M. Hammour. 1998b. Jobless growth: Appropriability, factor substitution and unemployment. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 48: 51–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caballero, R., and M. Hammour. 2001. Institutions, restructuring, and macroeconomic performance. In Advances in macroeconomic theory, ed. J. Dreze. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  15. Caballero, R., and M. Hammour. 2005. The cost of recessions revisited: A reverseliquidationist view. Review of Economic Studies 72: 313–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Caballero, R., K. Cowan, E. Engel, and A. Micco. 2004. Effective labor regulation and microeconomic flexibility. Mimeo, MIT.Google Scholar
  17. Caballero, R., T. Hoshi, and A. Kashyap. 2006. Zombie lending and depressed restructuring in Japan. Working paper no. 12129. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  18. Davis, S., J. Haltiwanger, and S. Schuh. 1996. Job creation and destruction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fishman, R., and V. Sarria-Allende. 2004. Regulation of entry and the distortion of industrial organization. Working paper no. 10929. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  20. Foster, L., J. Haltiwanger, and C. Krizan. 2001. Aggregate productivity growth: Lessons from microeconomic evidence. In New developments in productivity analysis, ed. E. Dean, M. Harper, and C. Hulten. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Klapper, L., L. Laeven, and R. Rajan. 2004. Business environment and firm entry: Evidence from international data. Working paper no. 10380. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
  22. Olley, S., and A. Pakes. 1996. The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 64: 1263–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schumpeter, J. 1934. Depressions. In Economics of the recovery program, ed. D. Brown et al. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Schumpeter, J. 1942. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper & Bros.Google Scholar
  25. Trefler, D. 2004. The long and short of the Canada–US Free Trade Agreement. American Economic Review 94: 870–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricardo J. Caballero
    • 1
  1. 1.