Abstract
This notoriously elusive and multifaceted notion assumed importance in the history of political economy because Marx’s ‘critique of political economy’, Capital, and particularly its first draft, the Grundrisse of 1857–8, was presented in a dialectical form. Part of the difficulty of encapsulating the dialectic within any concise definition derives from the fact that it may be conceived as a method of thought, a set of laws governing the world, the immanent movement of history or any combination of the three. The dialectic originated in ancient Greek philosophy. The original meaning of ‘dialogos’ was to reason by splitting in two. In one form of its development, dialectic was associated with reason. Starting with Zeno’s paradoxes, dialectical forms of reasoning were found in most of the philosophies of the ancient world and continued into medieval forms of disputation. It was this form of reasoning that Kant attacked in his distinction between the logic of understanding which, applied to the data of sensation, yielded knowledge of the phenomenal world, and dialectic or the logic of reasoning, which proceeded independently of experience and purported to give knowledge of the transcendent order of things in themselves. In another form of dialectic, the focus was primarily upon process: either an ascending dialectic in which the existence of a higher reality is demonstrated, or a descending form in which this higher reality is shown to manifest itself in the phenomenal world. Such conceptions were particularly associated with Christian eschatology, neo-platonism and illuminism, and typically patterned themselves into conceptions of original unity, division or loss, and ultimate reunification.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsBibliography
Althusser, L. 1965. For Marx. London: Allen Lane. 1969.
Bernstein, E. 1899. Evolutionary socialism. Stuttgart. English trans. E.C. Harvey. London: Independent Labour Party. 1909.
Bhaskar, R. 1983. Dialectic, materialism and human emancipation. London: New Left Books.
Cohen, G. 1978. Karl Marx’s theory of history: A defence. London: Oxford University Press.
Della Volpe, G. 1950. Logica come scienza positiva. Messina: G. d’Anna.
Elster, J. 1985. Making sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel, G.W.F. 1812–1816. The science of logic. London: Allen & Unwin. 1961.
Kolakowski, L. 1978. Main currents of Marxism Vol. I: The founders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lukács, G. 1923. History and class consciousness. London: Merlin. 1971.
Marx, K. 1844. Economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844. In Collected works, ed. K. Marx and F. Engels, vol. 3. London: Lawrence & Wishart. 1975.
Marx, K. 1847. The poverty of philosophy. In: Collected works. vol. 6. London: Lawrence & Wishart. 1976a.
Marx, K. 1857–8. Grundrisse. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 1973.
Marx, K. 1873. Capital. Vol. I. 2nd ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 1976b.
Rosdolsky, R. 1968. The making of Marx’s capital. Trans. P. Burgeis. London: Pluto Press. 1977.
Steedman, I. 1979. Marx on Ricardo. Discussion Paper No. 10, Department of Economics, University of Manchester.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Jones, G.S. (2018). Dialectical Reasoning. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_319
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_319
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences