The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Baumol’s Cost Disease

The Tendency for Costs and Prices to Rise in Sectors That Cannot Easily Incorporate Technological Advances, Relative to Technology-Adopting Sectors
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_3060

Abstract

The tendency for costs and prices to rise in sectors that cannot easily incorporate technological advances, relative to technology-adopting sectors.

The so-called cost disease was initially diagnosed by William Baumol and William Bowen (Baumol, W.J., and W. Bowen. 1966. Performing arts: The economic dilemma. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.) in their mid-1960s study of the performing arts on behalf of the Ford Foundation. Their observations regarding differential productivity enhancements in the “progressive” and “non-progressive” or “stagnant” sectors helped to explain the earnings gap in the arts as well as elements of urban crises and rising costs in many service sectors. Many theoretical and empirical studies later, the concept remains contentious, with supporters and doubters still.

Keywords

Productivity Unbalanced growth Cost disease 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Bates, L.J., and R.E. Santerre. 2015. Does Baumol’s cost disease account for nonfederal public-sector cost growth in the United States? A new test of an old idea. Social Science Quarterly 96 (1): 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumol, W.J. 1967. Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: The anatomy of urban crisis. American Economic Review 57 (3): 415–426.Google Scholar
  3. Baumol, W.J. 1996. Children of performing arts, the economic dilemma: The climbing costs of health care and education. Journal of Cultural Economics 20 (3): 200–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumol, W.J. 2012. The cost disease. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baumol, Hilda, and W.J. Baumol. 1984. The mass media and the cost disease. In The economics of cultural industries, ed. W.S. Hendon et al., 109–123. Akron: Association for Cultural Economics.Google Scholar
  6. Baumol, Hilda, and W.J. Baumol. 1985. The future of the theater and the cost disease of the arts. In Bach and the box: The impact of television on the performing arts, ed. Mary Ann Hendon et al., 7–31. Akron: Association for Cultural Economics.Google Scholar
  7. Baumol, W.J., and W. Bowen. 1966. Performing arts: The economic dilemma. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
  8. Bosworth, B.L., and J.E. Triplett. 2007. Services productivity in the United States: Griliches’s services volume revisited, chapter 14. In Hard-to-measure goods and services: essays in honor of Zvi Griliches, ed. E.R. Berndt and C.R. Hulten. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brooks, A.C. 1997. Toward a demand-side cure for cost disease in the performing arts. Journal of Economic Issues 31 (1): 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowen, Tyler. 1997. Why I do not believe in the cost-disease. Journal of Cultural Economics 20: 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eldridge, L.P., and Jennifer Price. 2016. Measuring quarterly labor productivity by industry. Monthly Labor Review, 1–26 June. Retrieved at https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2016/article/pdf/measuring-quarterly-labor-productivity-by-industry.pdf
  12. Flanagan, Robert. 2012. The perilous life of symphony orchestras. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gordon, R.J. 2016. The rise and fall of American growth. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gray, C.M., K.J. Borowiecki, and James Heilbrun. Forthcoming. The economics of art and culture. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hartwig, Jochen. 2008. Productivity growth in service industries: Are the transatlantic differences measurement-driven? Review of Income and Wealth 54 (3): 494–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Last, A.-K., and Heike Wetzel. 2011. Baumol’s cost disease, efficiency, and productivity in the performing arts: An analysis of German public theaters. Journal of Cultural Economics 35: 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rosen, Sherwin. 1981. The economics of superstars. American Economic Review 71 (5): 845–858.Google Scholar
  18. Towse, Ruth, ed. 1997. Baumol’s cost disease, the arts and other victims. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  19. Triplett, J.E., and B.P. Bosworth. 2003. Productivity measurement issues in service industries: “Baumol’s disease” has been cured. Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of St. Thomas, MinneapolisMinnesotaUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Robert Picard

There are no affiliations available