Abstract
It is often analytically convenient to abstract from the phenomenon of changing tastes in explaining or evaluating economic phenomena. Alfred Marshall for example defended the assumption of given wants as a useful, if crude, starting point in developing utility theory. Since the 1930s, however, the assumption of given wants has hardened increasingly into dogma. A notable step in that direction was taken in 1932, when Lionel Robbins gave wide currency to the definition of economics as the study of the relations between ends and means, the ends taken as given (Robbins 1932, Chapter 2).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Elster, J. 1979. Ulysses and the sirens: Studies in rationality and irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elster, J. 1985. Weakness of will and the free-rider problem. Economics and Philosophy 1(2): 231–266.
Felix, D. 1979. De gustibus disputandum est: Changing consumer preferences in economic growth. Explorations in Economic History 16: 260–296.
Frankfurt, H. 1971. Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. Journal of Philosophy 68: 5–20.
Galbraith, J.K. 1958. The affluent society. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Hammond, P. 1976. Changing tastes and coherent dynamic choice. Review of Economic Studies 43: 159–173.
Hefner, R.W. 1983. The problem of preference: Economics and ritual change in Highland Java. Man 17: 323–341.
Hirschman, A.O. 1982. Shifting involvements: Private interest and public action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hirschman, A.O. 1985. Against parsimony: Three easy ways of complicating economic discourse. Economics and Philosophy 1: 7–21.
McPherson, M.S. 1982. Mill’s moral theory and the problem of preference change. Ethics 92: 252–273.
McPherson, M.S. 1983. Want formation, morality, and some ‘interpretive’ aspects of economic inquiry. In Social science as moral inquiry, ed. M.S. McPherson. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rawls. 1982. Social unity and primary goods. In Utilitarianism and beyond, ed. A. Sen and B. Williams, 159–186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robbins, L. 1932. An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. London: Macmillan. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1969.
Scanlon, T.M. 1975. Preference and urgency. Journal of Philosophy 72: 655–669.
Schelling, T.C. 1978. Egonomics, or the art of self-management. American Economic Review 68: 290–294.
Schelling, T.C. 1980. The intimate contest for self-command. The Public Interest 60: 94–118.
Schelling, T.C. 1984. Ethics, law and the exercise of self-command. In Choice and consequence, ed. T.C. Schelling. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Scitovsky, T. 1976. The joyless economy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A.K. 1977. Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6: 317–344.
Sen, A.K. 1979. Utilitarianism and welfarism. Journal of Philosophy 76: 463–489.
Sen, A.K. 1982. On weights and measures: Informational constraints in social welfare analysis. In Choice, welfare, and measurement, ed. A.K. Sen, 226–263. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stigler, G.J., and G.S. Becker. 1977. De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review 67: 76–90.
Winston, G. 1980. Addiction and backsliding: A theory of compulsive consumption. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1(4): 295–324.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
McPherson, M.S. (2018). Changes in Tastes. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_305
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_305
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences